08.02.2017 Views

Skullwise Cat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hillary, and one that was dirtily disenfranchised by the Democratic party itself, or who voted<br />

third party - or simply stayed home - then that cannot be the fault of the voters. It can only be the<br />

fault of the candidate herself.<br />

From Cornell West:<br />

"White working- and middle-class fellow citizens – out of anger and anguish – rejected the<br />

economic neglect of neoliberal policies and the self-righteous arrogance of elites. Yet these same<br />

citizens also supported a candidate who appeared to blame their social misery on minorities, and<br />

who alienated Mexican immigrants, Muslims, black people, Jews, gay people, women and China<br />

in the process...This lethal fusion of economic insecurity and cultural scapegoating brought<br />

neoliberalism to its knees. In short, the abysmal failure of the Democratic party to speak to the<br />

arrested mobility and escalating poverty of working people unleashed a hate-filled populism and<br />

protectionism that threaten to tear apart the fragile fiber of what is left of US democracy."<br />

To be bitterly blunt, Trump is a fascist freak, and there is no way around this fact. My own<br />

mother calls him an "orange anus." He is odious and incompetent. He's beyond embarrassing, far<br />

more buffoonish and pernicious than Bush. He stokes hate crimes while stoking his own<br />

aggrandized ego. President Comacho from “Idiocracy” has more substance and charm than<br />

Trump.<br />

Which is why it's so confounding that the Democrats did not go full-force in countering Trump's<br />

egregious excesses. He COULD have been easy to beat - and Bernie Sanders would have done so,<br />

if he'd maintained the same compelling campaign as he did in the primaries - but the DNC chose<br />

to run a sinister establishment candidate who pandered to the middle right and in the process<br />

offered no real opposition.<br />

From Cornell West:<br />

"For 40 years, neoliberals lived in a world of denial and indifference to the suffering of poor and<br />

working people ... Despite some progressive words and symbolic gestures, Obama chose to<br />

ignore Wall Street crimes, reject bailouts for homeowners, oversee growing inequality and<br />

facilitate war crimes like US drones killing innocent civilians abroad."<br />

Initially, Obama was a refreshing step up from that clownish fascist, George W. Bush, to be sure.<br />

He was articulate, handsome, dignified, presidential. Everything that Bush was not. And he<br />

propagated a muted progressivism palatable to the masses. The problem is, most of his modestly<br />

progressive ideals have been eclipsed by his catering to neocon “values.” He's droned the hell out<br />

of seven Muslim-majority countries - SEVEN - and coddled Wall Street, cheating millions out of<br />

livable wages - or any wages at all. He's fervidly embraced privatization of public schools and<br />

even brought Black Lives Matter activists literally to tears through a callous dismissal of their<br />

vibrantly valid concerns (mass incarceration, police brutality, declining mobility, etc.) On the<br />

surface, Obama is everything we want in a president, but dig deeper - into the facts of his policies<br />

and achievements, that is - and you will see that he differs only in very subtle ways from the<br />

Republicans. Obama, like Clinton before him, is the very embodiment of neoliberalism, which<br />

neatly sets the stage for neofascism to take hold.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!