Preferential Adsorption and Co-nonsolvency of ... - au one net
Preferential Adsorption and Co-nonsolvency of ... - au one net
Preferential Adsorption and Co-nonsolvency of ... - au one net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Macromolecules ARTICLE<br />
(bl,m Kl,m/(n þ nAl þ nBm)). This function is called binding<br />
polynomial in the literature. It is equivalent to the gr<strong>and</strong> partition<br />
function <strong>of</strong> a H-bonding chain in the mixed solvent.<br />
The degree <strong>of</strong> binding for each comp<strong>one</strong>nt is defined by the<br />
average number <strong>of</strong> bound molecules per binding site on the<br />
polymer chain <strong>and</strong> derived from the binding polynomial by<br />
differentiation<br />
θRðyA, yBÞ<br />
1 ∂ ln p<br />
n ∂ ln yR<br />
ðR ¼ A, BÞ ð2.20Þ<br />
In summary, we have found<br />
βΔμ0, 0 ¼ 1 þ ln x - nv S þ ng0, 0 ð2.21aÞ<br />
βΔμ fA ¼ 1 þ ln yA - nAv S þ nAgfA<br />
βΔμ fB ¼ 1 þ ln yB - nBv S þ nBgfB<br />
ð2.21bÞ<br />
ð2.21cÞ<br />
with<br />
v S ¼ φ=n þ yA=nA þ yB=nB ð2.22Þ<br />
Substituting the equilibrium distribution function (2.16) back<br />
into the original free energy, we find<br />
βΔF=Ω ¼ F FH þ F AS ð2.23Þ<br />
where<br />
F FH ¼ φ<br />
n ln φ þ φA ln φA þ<br />
nA<br />
φB ln φB þ gðfφgÞ ð2.24Þ<br />
nB<br />
is the conventional Flory-Huggins free energy, <strong>and</strong><br />
F AS ¼ φ x<br />
ln<br />
n φ þ φA ln<br />
nA<br />
yA<br />
þ<br />
φA φB ln<br />
nB<br />
yB<br />
þðθA þ θBÞφ<br />
φB ð2.25Þ<br />
is the free energy due to the molecular association.<br />
3. PREFERENTIAL ADSORPTION BY POLYMERS IN<br />
MIXED SOLVENTS<br />
The total degree <strong>of</strong> binding is<br />
θ θA þ θB ð3.1Þ<br />
If there is no interaction between the bound molecules, the total<br />
is given by the simple mixing law<br />
ð3.2Þ<br />
where θR° is the degree <strong>of</strong> binding in each pure solvent, <strong>and</strong><br />
xR NR=ðNA þ NBÞ ðR¼A, BÞ ð3.3Þ<br />
are the mole fractions <strong>of</strong> the solvent. The excess binding is then<br />
defined by<br />
Δθ E<br />
θ° θ °<br />
A xA þ θ °<br />
B xB<br />
θ - θ° ¼ θA - θ °<br />
A xA þ θB - θ °<br />
B xB<br />
ð3.4Þ<br />
For cosolvency, the excess is positive, while for co-<strong>nonsolvency</strong><br />
it is negative. There is a possibility that the excess binding<br />
changes its sign at a certain composition <strong>of</strong> the mixed solvent.<br />
The mole fraction <strong>of</strong> the bound molecules at such a particular<br />
concentration takes exactly the same value as the mole fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
the solvent in the bulk outside the coil region. Such a particular<br />
point is called azeotropic binding. 26<br />
In what follows we focus on co-<strong>nonsolvency</strong>, <strong>and</strong> derive Gibbs<br />
matrix for the study <strong>of</strong> phase separation. As for the composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the solvent mixture, we use its volume fraction<br />
vR nRNR=ðnANA þ nBNBÞ ðR¼A, BÞ ð3.5Þ<br />
as well as the mole fraction. We then have<br />
φA ¼ð1-φÞvA, φB ¼ð1-φÞvB ð3.6Þ<br />
We regard the volume fraction vB <strong>of</strong> the second solvent as the<br />
controlling parameter, <strong>and</strong> write it as vB ξ. We then have vA =1<br />
- ξ.<br />
3.1. Transition Matrix. Let us first relate the variation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
volume fraction yA <strong>and</strong> yB <strong>of</strong> the free solvents by the variation <strong>of</strong><br />
the independent variable φA <strong>and</strong> φB (solvent composition) which<br />
are controlled variables in the experiments. We first define a<br />
matrix JR,β by the equation<br />
d ln yR ¼ X<br />
JR, βdφβ ð3.7Þ<br />
Or, in the matrix form<br />
2 3<br />
dlnyA<br />
4 5 ¼<br />
dlnyB<br />
JA,<br />
2 3<br />
A<br />
4<br />
JB, A<br />
JA, B<br />
5<br />
JB, B<br />
dφ 2 3<br />
A<br />
4 5<br />
dφB ð3.8Þ<br />
By taking the derivatives <strong>of</strong> the material conservation laws<br />
(2.18a) to (2.18c), we have<br />
p dx þ φðθA dlnyA þ θB dlnyBÞ ¼ - ðdφA þ dφBÞ=n ðyA þ nAφθAKA, AÞ dlnyA þ nAφ AθAKA, B dlnyB<br />
2981 dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma102695n |Macromolecules 2011, 44, 2978–2989<br />
β<br />
¼ð1 þ nAθAÞ dφ A þ nAθA dφ B<br />
nBφθBKB, A dlnyB þðyB þ nBφθBKB, BÞ dlnyB<br />
¼ nBθB dφA þð1þ nBθBÞ dφB where the matrix KR,β is defined by<br />
∂ ln θR<br />
KR, β<br />
∂ ln yβ<br />
Solving these equations for d lnyR, we find<br />
JA, A ¼fð1-φB- yAÞ½yB þðφB - yBÞKB, BŠ<br />
- ðφA - yAÞðφB - yBÞKA, Bg=φΦ<br />
ð3.9Þ<br />
ð3.10Þ<br />
JA, B ¼ðφ A - yAÞ½yB - φKA, B þðφ B - yBÞðKB, B - KA, BÞŠ=φΦ<br />
JB, A ¼ðφ B - yBÞ½yA - φKB, A þðφ A - yAÞðKA, A - KB, AÞŠ=φΦ<br />
JB, B ¼fð1-φA- yBÞ½yA þðφA - yAÞKA, AŠ<br />
- ðφB - yBÞðφA - yAÞKB, Ag=φΦ ð3.11Þ<br />
where<br />
ΦðyA, yBÞ yAyB þðφA - yAÞyBKA, A þðφB - yBÞyAKB, B<br />
þðφA - yAÞðφB - yBÞK ð3.12Þ<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
K KA, AKB, B - KA, BKB, A ð3.13Þ<br />
is the determinant <strong>of</strong> the matrix ^K.