VA/DoD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR OPIOID THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN
2lfFhbO
2lfFhbO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>VA</strong>/<strong>DoD</strong> Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain<br />
PTSD when their pain is aggressively managed starting soon after injury.[93] In those cases, LOT may be<br />
appropriate only if risk mitigation strategies are employed and patients are titrated off LOT as soon as it is<br />
appropriate (see Recommendations 14 and 15).<br />
The added risk that younger patients using opioids face for OUD and overdose is great. Edlund et al. (2014)<br />
found that, compared to patients ≥65 years old, patients 18-30 years old carried 11 times the odds of OUD<br />
and overdose. Patients 31-40 years old carried 5 times the odds of OUD and overdose compared to those<br />
≥65 years old.[86] Bohnert et al. (2011) found that, compared to subjects 18-29 years old, patients 30-39<br />
years old had roughly half the risk of developing OUD or overdose (HR: 0.56, CI: 0.27-1.17). Compared to<br />
the subjects 18-29 years old, patients ≥70 years old had a far less (nearly 1/17) risk of developing OUD or<br />
overdose (HR: 0.06, CI: 0.02, 0.18).[59]<br />
Younger patients are also at a higher risk of opioid misuse (as suggested by a UDT indicating high-risk<br />
medication-related behavior). Turner et al. (2014) showed that patients in the 45-64 year age group were<br />
significantly less likely to have an aberrant UDT (detection of a non-prescribed opioid, non-prescribed<br />
benzodiazepine, illicit drug, or tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) in comparison to patients in the 20-44 age<br />
group.[94] Patients in the 45-64 and ≥65 age groups were significantly less likely than 20-44 year olds to<br />
have non-detection of a prescribed opioid as well (indicating possible diversion).[94]<br />
An age of 30 years was chosen based on how age was categorized in the six studies that showed an inverse<br />
relationship between age and OUD or overdose. One of those six studies found that patients with OUD<br />
were younger than patients without OUD, but did not find a statistically significant relationship.[87] Two of<br />
those six studies examined age as a continuous predictor, and neither reported a specific age where the<br />
risk of OUD or overdose changed markedly.[62,92] One study examined age as a dichotomous (