18.02.2017 Views

VA/DoD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR OPIOID THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN

2lfFhbO

2lfFhbO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>VA</strong>/<strong>DoD</strong> Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain<br />

PTSD when their pain is aggressively managed starting soon after injury.[93] In those cases, LOT may be<br />

appropriate only if risk mitigation strategies are employed and patients are titrated off LOT as soon as it is<br />

appropriate (see Recommendations 14 and 15).<br />

The added risk that younger patients using opioids face for OUD and overdose is great. Edlund et al. (2014)<br />

found that, compared to patients ≥65 years old, patients 18-30 years old carried 11 times the odds of OUD<br />

and overdose. Patients 31-40 years old carried 5 times the odds of OUD and overdose compared to those<br />

≥65 years old.[86] Bohnert et al. (2011) found that, compared to subjects 18-29 years old, patients 30-39<br />

years old had roughly half the risk of developing OUD or overdose (HR: 0.56, CI: 0.27-1.17). Compared to<br />

the subjects 18-29 years old, patients ≥70 years old had a far less (nearly 1/17) risk of developing OUD or<br />

overdose (HR: 0.06, CI: 0.02, 0.18).[59]<br />

Younger patients are also at a higher risk of opioid misuse (as suggested by a UDT indicating high-risk<br />

medication-related behavior). Turner et al. (2014) showed that patients in the 45-64 year age group were<br />

significantly less likely to have an aberrant UDT (detection of a non-prescribed opioid, non-prescribed<br />

benzodiazepine, illicit drug, or tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) in comparison to patients in the 20-44 age<br />

group.[94] Patients in the 45-64 and ≥65 age groups were significantly less likely than 20-44 year olds to<br />

have non-detection of a prescribed opioid as well (indicating possible diversion).[94]<br />

An age of 30 years was chosen based on how age was categorized in the six studies that showed an inverse<br />

relationship between age and OUD or overdose. One of those six studies found that patients with OUD<br />

were younger than patients without OUD, but did not find a statistically significant relationship.[87] Two of<br />

those six studies examined age as a continuous predictor, and neither reported a specific age where the<br />

risk of OUD or overdose changed markedly.[62,92] One study examined age as a dichotomous (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!