22.02.2017 Views

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2016/17

2lEHU9j

2lEHU9j

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sowing “social discord” in social media.<br />

During the year, Madhesi activist Chandra<br />

Kant Raut and several supporters faced<br />

multiple sedition charges for peacefully<br />

expressing political opinions.<br />

DISCRIMINATION<br />

Discrimination on the basis of gender, caste,<br />

class, ethnic origin, sexual orientation,<br />

gender identity and religion persisted.<br />

Constitutional amendments did not guarantee<br />

equal rights to citizenship for women, or<br />

provide protection from discrimination to<br />

marginalized communities, including Dalits<br />

and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and<br />

intersex people.<br />

The law criminalizing rape was amended<br />

so that the statute of limitations on reporting<br />

the crime was raised from 35 to 180 days<br />

rather than being abolished altogether as<br />

required by human rights standards. Genderbased<br />

discrimination continued to undermine<br />

women's and girls’ rights to control their<br />

sexuality and make informed choices related<br />

to reproduction; challenge early and forced<br />

marriages; and enjoy adequate antenatal and<br />

maternal health care. Women continued to<br />

face domestic violence, including marital<br />

rape. Women from marginalized groups,<br />

including Dalits and Indigenous women,<br />

remained at greater risk of intersecting forms<br />

of discrimination.<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

Kingdom of the Netherlands<br />

Head of state: King Willem-Alexander<br />

Head of government: Mark Rutte<br />

Irregular migrants continued to be routinely<br />

deprived of their liberty and the government<br />

still did not adequately consider alternatives<br />

to detention. Ethnic profiling by the police<br />

continued to be a matter of serious<br />

concern.<br />

REFUGEES’ AND MIGRANTS’ RIGHTS<br />

Following a fire in a detention facility in<br />

Rotterdam on 25 May, several migrants were<br />

placed in solitary confinement as a punitive<br />

measure for “disturbing public order” during<br />

the evacuation.<br />

In October, a draft law regulating<br />

immigration detention was tabled before<br />

Parliament. It offered minor improvements,<br />

but major concerns remained as irregular<br />

migrants could be deprived of their liberty for<br />

a wide range of reasons. The punitive<br />

character of the detention regime also<br />

remained in place. Furthermore, the draft law<br />

included powers to hold migrants in a cell for<br />

at least 16 hours a day.<br />

RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD<br />

OF LIVING<br />

The authorities remained unwilling to<br />

implement the recommendation by the<br />

European Committee of Social Rights that all<br />

people, including irregular migrants, should<br />

have unconditional access to shelter and<br />

other basic necessities.<br />

DISCRIMINATION<br />

Ethnic profiling by police<br />

Ethnic profiling by the police continued to be<br />

a matter of serious concern. While the<br />

authorities acknowledged the damaging<br />

effects of ethnic profiling, they failed to<br />

formulate a comprehensive plan for the fair<br />

and effective use of stop-and-search powers.<br />

The police also continued to refuse to<br />

systematically monitor and record stop-andsearch<br />

operations, making it difficult to<br />

assess whether measures to combat ethnic<br />

profiling, such as training, diversity<br />

management and dialogue with communities,<br />

were effective in reducing discrimination.<br />

Partial ban on face-covering<br />

A government proposal for a ban on facecovering<br />

attire in certain spaces, such as<br />

public transport and public educational and<br />

health care institutions, passed the House of<br />

Representatives in November but was still<br />

pending before the Senate. The ban would<br />

restrict the rights to freedom of religion and of<br />

expression, particularly of Muslim women.<br />

Amnesty International Report <strong>2016</strong>/<strong>17</strong> 271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!