12.12.2012 Views

CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario

CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario

CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Message<br />

from the Chair<br />

Along with the Council and management team <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Institute</strong>, let me begin by expressing my delight at the<br />

arrival <strong>of</strong> Rod Barr, FCA, as our new President and CEO.<br />

Rod’s extensive and hands-on familiarity with CA pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

affairs was acquired both through a long and accomplished<br />

career at Deloitte & Touche LLP, and during many years <strong>of</strong><br />

volunteer involvement at the <strong>Institute</strong> itself. The latter<br />

included a two-year tenure as our Chair from 2004 to 2006<br />

and a subsequent seat on the CICA Board <strong>of</strong> Directors, all<br />

while remaining a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Institute</strong> Council.<br />

All this means that Rod has been able to hit the ground<br />

running – and running hard – as the following will attest.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards and the AIT: Exception granted!<br />

First, our long effort to protect our province’s internationally<br />

recognized standards for public accounting in the new<br />

Agreement on Internal Trade has turned the corner. Just as<br />

this issue <strong>of</strong> CheckMark went to press, the <strong>Institute</strong><br />

received formal notification from the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong><br />

that it will indeed mandate a “legitimate objective<br />

exception” for the province’s rigorous public accounting<br />

qualification standards, which are required by legislation<br />

and overseen by the Public <strong>Accountants</strong> Council. Doing so<br />

will safeguard these standards from provisions in the<br />

agreement which would otherwise enable the “automatic<br />

certification” <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals from other provinces with less<br />

rigorous regimes. We are delighted with this result, and will<br />

update you as implementation details become available.<br />

Toward the finish line on a new <strong>Chartered</strong> <strong>Accountants</strong><br />

Act<br />

Secondly, members will know that passage <strong>of</strong> Bill 158, an<br />

entirely new CA Act, tabled in the spring <strong>of</strong> this year, has<br />

been hamstrung in part by the lobbying <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

accounting bodies outside Canada that claim that<br />

Gerald Mills, FCA<br />

provisions in the bill would obstruct entry to providing<br />

accounting services in <strong>Ontario</strong> for internationally trained<br />

accountants. It does no such thing. (Please visit The Facts<br />

on Bill 158 on the <strong>Institute</strong>’s homepage, at www.icao.on.ca,<br />

for the facts <strong>of</strong> the matter.)<br />

The prohibition on the unauthorized or misleading use <strong>of</strong><br />

“<strong>Chartered</strong>” and “Accountant” and its iterations is in fact<br />

more than half a century old, and poses no impediment<br />

whatsoever to members <strong>of</strong> those other accounting bodies<br />

who have <strong>of</strong>fered their services for many years now in<br />

<strong>Ontario</strong> and can continue to do so. In reality, Bill 158 is an<br />

urgently needed set <strong>of</strong> updates to the <strong>Institute</strong>’s regulatory<br />

authority to deal with a very different environment than<br />

existed in 1956, at the time <strong>of</strong> the current CA Act’s<br />

passage. It simply carries over these restrictions on the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> our name and designation.<br />

Having responded to these objections about Bill 158 with<br />

information directed to decision-makers at Queen’s Park<br />

and employers <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional accountants, and in media<br />

coverage <strong>of</strong> the issue, we have urged the <strong>Ontario</strong><br />

government to pass this legislation during the fall sitting <strong>of</strong><br />

the House.<br />

Auditor liability reform: back on the radar<br />

Throughout the whole period that these matters have been<br />

in play, and as <strong>Ontario</strong> wrestled with the worst <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recession, the <strong>Institute</strong> was required by necessity to scale<br />

back its long-running advocacy efforts toward a sensible<br />

legal liability regime for audit and assurance pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

This has now changed: In September, the Law Commission<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong> (LCO) – an independent body formed to advise<br />

governments on legal reform matters – announced a study<br />

into the impacts <strong>of</strong> the current, and increasingly ruinous,<br />

system <strong>of</strong> joint-and-several liability.<br />

(Please see page 5)<br />

CheckMark • <strong>Autumn</strong> 2009<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!