CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario
CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario
CM Autumn Template - Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Message<br />
from the Chair<br />
Along with the Council and management team <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Institute</strong>, let me begin by expressing my delight at the<br />
arrival <strong>of</strong> Rod Barr, FCA, as our new President and CEO.<br />
Rod’s extensive and hands-on familiarity with CA pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
affairs was acquired both through a long and accomplished<br />
career at Deloitte & Touche LLP, and during many years <strong>of</strong><br />
volunteer involvement at the <strong>Institute</strong> itself. The latter<br />
included a two-year tenure as our Chair from 2004 to 2006<br />
and a subsequent seat on the CICA Board <strong>of</strong> Directors, all<br />
while remaining a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Institute</strong> Council.<br />
All this means that Rod has been able to hit the ground<br />
running – and running hard – as the following will attest.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards and the AIT: Exception granted!<br />
First, our long effort to protect our province’s internationally<br />
recognized standards for public accounting in the new<br />
Agreement on Internal Trade has turned the corner. Just as<br />
this issue <strong>of</strong> CheckMark went to press, the <strong>Institute</strong><br />
received formal notification from the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong><br />
that it will indeed mandate a “legitimate objective<br />
exception” for the province’s rigorous public accounting<br />
qualification standards, which are required by legislation<br />
and overseen by the Public <strong>Accountants</strong> Council. Doing so<br />
will safeguard these standards from provisions in the<br />
agreement which would otherwise enable the “automatic<br />
certification” <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals from other provinces with less<br />
rigorous regimes. We are delighted with this result, and will<br />
update you as implementation details become available.<br />
Toward the finish line on a new <strong>Chartered</strong> <strong>Accountants</strong><br />
Act<br />
Secondly, members will know that passage <strong>of</strong> Bill 158, an<br />
entirely new CA Act, tabled in the spring <strong>of</strong> this year, has<br />
been hamstrung in part by the lobbying <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
accounting bodies outside Canada that claim that<br />
Gerald Mills, FCA<br />
provisions in the bill would obstruct entry to providing<br />
accounting services in <strong>Ontario</strong> for internationally trained<br />
accountants. It does no such thing. (Please visit The Facts<br />
on Bill 158 on the <strong>Institute</strong>’s homepage, at www.icao.on.ca,<br />
for the facts <strong>of</strong> the matter.)<br />
The prohibition on the unauthorized or misleading use <strong>of</strong><br />
“<strong>Chartered</strong>” and “Accountant” and its iterations is in fact<br />
more than half a century old, and poses no impediment<br />
whatsoever to members <strong>of</strong> those other accounting bodies<br />
who have <strong>of</strong>fered their services for many years now in<br />
<strong>Ontario</strong> and can continue to do so. In reality, Bill 158 is an<br />
urgently needed set <strong>of</strong> updates to the <strong>Institute</strong>’s regulatory<br />
authority to deal with a very different environment than<br />
existed in 1956, at the time <strong>of</strong> the current CA Act’s<br />
passage. It simply carries over these restrictions on the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> our name and designation.<br />
Having responded to these objections about Bill 158 with<br />
information directed to decision-makers at Queen’s Park<br />
and employers <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional accountants, and in media<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the issue, we have urged the <strong>Ontario</strong><br />
government to pass this legislation during the fall sitting <strong>of</strong><br />
the House.<br />
Auditor liability reform: back on the radar<br />
Throughout the whole period that these matters have been<br />
in play, and as <strong>Ontario</strong> wrestled with the worst <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recession, the <strong>Institute</strong> was required by necessity to scale<br />
back its long-running advocacy efforts toward a sensible<br />
legal liability regime for audit and assurance pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />
This has now changed: In September, the Law Commission<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong> (LCO) – an independent body formed to advise<br />
governments on legal reform matters – announced a study<br />
into the impacts <strong>of</strong> the current, and increasingly ruinous,<br />
system <strong>of</strong> joint-and-several liability.<br />
(Please see page 5)<br />
CheckMark • <strong>Autumn</strong> 2009<br />
3