03.05.2017 Views

Spring Martlet 2017

Spring Martlet 2017 V2

Spring Martlet 2017 V2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARE THERE ENOUGH STRONG<br />

‘WIDENING PARTICIPATION’<br />

CANDIDATES OUT THERE?<br />

We’ve developed a scheme<br />

which promotes widening<br />

participation and which<br />

works within the University’s<br />

current admissions process<br />

and competitive standards.<br />

It takes students who have<br />

already shown exceptional<br />

ability and potential, and then<br />

through an intensive bridging<br />

programme gives them that<br />

extra boost which other<br />

students already benefit<br />

from because of their school<br />

and family background. In<br />

offering new places, we’re<br />

not reducing anyone else’s<br />

chances of gaining a place at<br />

Univ – we’re creating a new<br />

opportunity for new students.<br />

Sir Ivor Crewe, Master of<br />

University College<br />

This scheme is predicated on the assumption that there are good flagged students already in the<br />

applicant pool who are missing out on offers. Is this in fact the case? University-wide, the answer is<br />

certainly yes. Over the three years 2013-15, nearly a quarter of disadvantaged candidates who applied<br />

to Oxford and were not made an offer went on to exceed the standard offer for their course by at<br />

least one grade (e.g. A*AA for an AAA offer). Over the three years, there were almost 600 of these<br />

students in total. That is not to suggest that every single student who goes on to exceed our conditional<br />

offers should be admitted – we see many such students from all backgrounds every year and we reject<br />

them for good reasons – but it does seem that there are quite a lot of candidates who apply from<br />

disadvantaged backgrounds, who go on to achieve A Level results which are better than those of some<br />

of the students whom we take, and yet are not admitted. To the extent that it is possible to identify them<br />

at time of application, these are the students whom this scheme seeks to target.<br />

In the three years 2013 – 15, Univ received 127 applications from candidates with two or more flags<br />

and 67 applications from candidates with three or more flags. Of the 127 applicants with two flags, 69<br />

(54.3%) were shortlisted and 30 (23.6%) received an offer. Of the 67 applicants with three flags, 44<br />

(65.7%) were shortlisted and 23 (34.3%) received an offer. This compares with an overall average for<br />

UK-schooled applicants of 51.4% being shortlisted and 26.8% receiving offers. This is all in the noise, but<br />

it does at least show that there are good flagged candidates out there, and that Univ already has a fair<br />

few flagged applicants who are deemed worthy of shortlisting but who do not currently receive offers.<br />

Taking the university-wide data on A Level performance together with the College data on numbers of<br />

applicants, we can be confident that we are very likely to have a decent number of flagged applicants<br />

worthy of considering seriously for a place on the proposed scheme, and that’s without taking account<br />

of any additional strong applicants whom the scheme attracts.<br />

12 THE MARTLET | SPRING <strong>2017</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!