17.05.2017 Views

Participatory Propaganda in Seven Simple Steps

This series explores how propaganda is changing in a Digital Age, outlining an emerging hybrid model that is participatory, actively engaging target audiences in the spread of persuasive messaging.

This series explores how propaganda is changing in a Digital Age, outlining an emerging hybrid model that is participatory, actively engaging target audiences in the spread of persuasive messaging.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20<br />

21<br />

the Cruz and Trump campaigns purports to be<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g similar track<strong>in</strong>g techniques 24 to identify target<br />

audiences and create customised, persuasive<br />

messag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tended to illicit a specific response.<br />

There has been some debate as to how genu<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Cambridge Analytica’s claims are 25 – but it isn’t so<br />

much whether these techniques happened <strong>in</strong> the<br />

2016 presidential campaign or not, it is that this<br />

• Group #1: The Supporters – This group<br />

consists of people who already support the<br />

candidate and as such make the most ideal<br />

candidates to become propagandists <strong>in</strong> a<br />

participatory propaganda model. In terms<br />

of Trump, this would <strong>in</strong>clude the 681,864<br />

people follow<strong>in</strong>g Eagle Ris<strong>in</strong>g, the 249,720<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d Citizens for Trump, and the 29,121<br />

who like Wake Up & Reclaim America.<br />

can be persuaded. People are more likely<br />

to believe those familiar 26 to them or those<br />

they view as <strong>in</strong>fluential, 27 and 20% of those<br />

surveyed by Pew Research Centre <strong>in</strong> 2016<br />

said “they’ve modified their stance on a social<br />

or political issue because of material they saw<br />

on social media, and 17%” had perspectives<br />

changed this way about a political candidate. 28<br />

• Group #4: The Forgetables – this group is not<br />

likely to change their m<strong>in</strong>d. In the 2016 election<br />

example, these are the die-hard Cl<strong>in</strong>ton<br />

supporters. Noth<strong>in</strong>g Trump could say would<br />

ever persuade this group to switch sides. The<br />

tactic for mitigat<strong>in</strong>g this group is to drown out<br />

their attempts to propagandise The Unlikelys.<br />

Of course, each segment can be further divided for<br />

is where th<strong>in</strong>gs are headed regardless. The fact is,<br />

Content delivered to this group will aim to<br />

• Group #3: The Unlikelys – this group<br />

hyper-targeted messag<strong>in</strong>g campaigns, but this is a<br />

that there is a wealth of <strong>in</strong>formation collected about<br />

encourage their active support <strong>in</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

has fundamentally oppos<strong>in</strong>g views to the<br />

quick generalisation. With knowledge of who the<br />

each and every one of us when we engage onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

a propaganda message. The Supporters will<br />

propagandist such that they are never likely<br />

audiences are and what makes them tick – it’s on<br />

This data can pa<strong>in</strong>t a very accurate picture of who<br />

be called on to help recruit the next group;<br />

to be swayed, however, they are also not<br />

to step two.<br />

you are, which can <strong>in</strong> turn be used to segment you<br />

yet fervently beh<strong>in</strong>d the oppos<strong>in</strong>g camp. In<br />

<strong>in</strong>to ‘target audiences’, and feed very manipulative<br />

• Group #2: The W<strong>in</strong>nables – these people<br />

a political campaign, the aim with this group<br />

content aimed at provok<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tended response.<br />

are possible supporters who are likely to be<br />

is to discourage them from support<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

swayed with the proper message delivered<br />

opponent. No vote at all is better than a vote<br />

For example, voters <strong>in</strong> the 2016 U.S. presidential<br />

by the right person at the appropriate time.<br />

for the other candidate.<br />

election might be broken out <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The W<strong>in</strong>nables might not be on board at<br />

broader audience groups:<br />

the outset, but via their connections to The<br />

Supporters or sentiments on key issues they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!