Participatory Propaganda in Seven Simple Steps
This series explores how propaganda is changing in a Digital Age, outlining an emerging hybrid model that is participatory, actively engaging target audiences in the spread of persuasive messaging.
This series explores how propaganda is changing in a Digital Age, outlining an emerging hybrid model that is participatory, actively engaging target audiences in the spread of persuasive messaging.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20<br />
21<br />
the Cruz and Trump campaigns purports to be<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g similar track<strong>in</strong>g techniques 24 to identify target<br />
audiences and create customised, persuasive<br />
messag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tended to illicit a specific response.<br />
There has been some debate as to how genu<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Cambridge Analytica’s claims are 25 – but it isn’t so<br />
much whether these techniques happened <strong>in</strong> the<br />
2016 presidential campaign or not, it is that this<br />
• Group #1: The Supporters – This group<br />
consists of people who already support the<br />
candidate and as such make the most ideal<br />
candidates to become propagandists <strong>in</strong> a<br />
participatory propaganda model. In terms<br />
of Trump, this would <strong>in</strong>clude the 681,864<br />
people follow<strong>in</strong>g Eagle Ris<strong>in</strong>g, the 249,720<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d Citizens for Trump, and the 29,121<br />
who like Wake Up & Reclaim America.<br />
can be persuaded. People are more likely<br />
to believe those familiar 26 to them or those<br />
they view as <strong>in</strong>fluential, 27 and 20% of those<br />
surveyed by Pew Research Centre <strong>in</strong> 2016<br />
said “they’ve modified their stance on a social<br />
or political issue because of material they saw<br />
on social media, and 17%” had perspectives<br />
changed this way about a political candidate. 28<br />
• Group #4: The Forgetables – this group is not<br />
likely to change their m<strong>in</strong>d. In the 2016 election<br />
example, these are the die-hard Cl<strong>in</strong>ton<br />
supporters. Noth<strong>in</strong>g Trump could say would<br />
ever persuade this group to switch sides. The<br />
tactic for mitigat<strong>in</strong>g this group is to drown out<br />
their attempts to propagandise The Unlikelys.<br />
Of course, each segment can be further divided for<br />
is where th<strong>in</strong>gs are headed regardless. The fact is,<br />
Content delivered to this group will aim to<br />
• Group #3: The Unlikelys – this group<br />
hyper-targeted messag<strong>in</strong>g campaigns, but this is a<br />
that there is a wealth of <strong>in</strong>formation collected about<br />
encourage their active support <strong>in</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />
has fundamentally oppos<strong>in</strong>g views to the<br />
quick generalisation. With knowledge of who the<br />
each and every one of us when we engage onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
a propaganda message. The Supporters will<br />
propagandist such that they are never likely<br />
audiences are and what makes them tick – it’s on<br />
This data can pa<strong>in</strong>t a very accurate picture of who<br />
be called on to help recruit the next group;<br />
to be swayed, however, they are also not<br />
to step two.<br />
you are, which can <strong>in</strong> turn be used to segment you<br />
yet fervently beh<strong>in</strong>d the oppos<strong>in</strong>g camp. In<br />
<strong>in</strong>to ‘target audiences’, and feed very manipulative<br />
• Group #2: The W<strong>in</strong>nables – these people<br />
a political campaign, the aim with this group<br />
content aimed at provok<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tended response.<br />
are possible supporters who are likely to be<br />
is to discourage them from support<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
swayed with the proper message delivered<br />
opponent. No vote at all is better than a vote<br />
For example, voters <strong>in</strong> the 2016 U.S. presidential<br />
by the right person at the appropriate time.<br />
for the other candidate.<br />
election might be broken out <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The W<strong>in</strong>nables might not be on board at<br />
broader audience groups:<br />
the outset, but via their connections to The<br />
Supporters or sentiments on key issues they