22.05.2017 Views

CCRStandardsAdultEd

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C. RATIONALES FOR THE SELECTION OF THE COMMON CORE 114<br />

formulas was important, as demonstrated in their selection of 5.MD.3 through<br />

5.MD.5. Both address an understanding of volume and applications using volume<br />

formulas for right rectangular prisms. Continuing with that line of reasoning,<br />

G.GMD.3 was selected (Use volume formulas for cylinders, pyramids, cones, and<br />

spheres to solve problems) in lieu of 8.G.9 (Know the formulas for the volumes of<br />

cones, cylinders, and spheres and use them to solve real-world and mathematical<br />

problems). The high school standard subsumes 8.G.9, as it requires understanding and<br />

using volume formulas for pyramids in addition to cones, cylinders, and spheres,<br />

whereas 8.G.9 implies only memorization of the mathematical formulas.<br />

Several standards requiring transformations (translations, reflections, rotations,<br />

dilations) were also selected, with a focus on important concepts of congruence and<br />

similarity (8.G.2 and 8.G.4). However, 8.G.1 (requiring transformation<br />

experimentation) and 8.G.3 (requiring that students describe the effect of<br />

transformations) were not considered central enough to the concepts of congruence<br />

and similarity.<br />

Rather than requiring formal proof (e.g., G.CO.9 through G.CO.11), panelists agreed<br />

that more informal reasoning—constructing viable arguments and evaluating the<br />

reasoning of others—was more important as a core requirement for adult learners. For<br />

this reason, 8.G.5 (Use informal arguments to establish facts about…) and G.SRT.5<br />

(Use congruence and similarity criteria for triangles to solve problems and to prove<br />

relationships in geometric figures) both were selected.<br />

Formal construction also was downplayed in the selected standards, since it takes<br />

time and specialized tools, with little pay-off for most adult students. For this reason,<br />

neither G.CO.12 (Make formal geometric constructions with a variety of tools and<br />

methods…) nor G.CO.13 (Construct an equilateral triangle, a square, and a regular<br />

hexagon inscribed in a circle) were selected. This content is picked up in more expert<br />

training for professional drafters or industrial or architectural engineering. Standards<br />

requiring students more informally to “draw” a geometric figure—particularly on a<br />

coordinate plane, such as 4.G.1 (Draw points, lines, line segments, rays, angles (right,<br />

acute, obtuse), and perpendicular and parallel lines…) and 6.G.3 (Draw polygons in<br />

the coordinate plane…) were selected.<br />

Based on suggestions from the CCSS mathematics writers and the postsecondary<br />

faculty survey, G.MG.2 (Apply concepts of density based on area and volume in<br />

modeling situations…) was added to the selections in the final round. While panelists<br />

did not originally select this standard, they agreed that this concept would provide<br />

adult learners with relevant opportunities to apply ratio and proportional reasoning.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!