22.05.2017 Views

CCRStandardsAdultEd

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7<br />

3 PROCESS OF SELECTING<br />

COLLEGE AND CAREER<br />

READINESS STANDARDS FOR<br />

ADULT EDUCATION<br />

To identify a set of College and Career Readiness (CCR) standards for adult<br />

education, MPR Associates, Inc. convened two independent panels—one each for<br />

English language arts and literacy (ELA/literacy) and mathematics—to look at the<br />

Common Core State Standards (CCSS) from the perspective of adult education.<br />

Rather than asking Adult Basic Education experts to work in isolation, a cross section<br />

of stakeholders who serve adults participated. To forge a vigorous synergy, each<br />

panel included a mix of expertise and experience, including representatives from<br />

adult education, community colleges, career and technical training, and the military.<br />

The methodology employed was deliberative, multilayered, iterative, and evidencebased<br />

(see In-Depth Description of the Selection Process in Appendix A for more<br />

detail). Over nine months, panelists were asked to make reasoned judgments about<br />

the relevance of the CCSS for adults, based on where the evidence for college and<br />

career readiness was most compelling, and to revisit and verify those judgments in<br />

light of feedback and new questions. 2<br />

Because the goal was to determine the applicability of an accepted set of essential<br />

CCR standards, judgments about relevance and importance were made based on each<br />

standard as written. This project was not designed to edit or refine the wording of the<br />

CCSS or otherwise develop CCR standards de novo; panelists did not have the<br />

autonomy to add content to the CCSS. The only exceptions made to maintaining the<br />

exact wording of the CCSS were the following:<br />

• Some examples included with the standards for K–12 students (usually found in<br />

parentheses or italics within the standards) were adapted to be more appropriate<br />

for adult students because these were only illustrations and not meant to be<br />

mandatory or to apply universally.<br />

2 Data from national surveys were compiled as background for the panel review from: ACT (2009); Conley et al. (2011) (referred<br />

to in this report as the EPIC faculty survey); and Casner-Lotto and Barrington (2006) (referred to in this report as the employer<br />

survey). Refer to Appendix A for descriptions of these resources.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!