27.05.2017 Views

010815as1

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taxpayers have spent considerable resources on these programs and mitigation projects.<br />

According to the Congressional Research Service, the federal government has spent more than<br />

$11.4 billion on the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program between 1989 and 2014, and $7.8 billion of<br />

that was spent since 2003. 581 CRS also estimated that, since 2003, $3.4 billion in public<br />

assistance funds awarded have been spent on mitigation projects. 582<br />

Supporters of FEMA’s mitigation spending and programs point to a 2005 FEMAcommissioned<br />

study which evaluated whether mitigation activities decrease future<br />

expenditures, and found that a dollar spent on mitigation results in four dollars saved in disaster<br />

spending. 583 However, Congress, the Department, and other watchdogs should study whether<br />

spending on mitigation projects have in fact yielded savings after FEMA has spent billions on<br />

these projects. For example, if spending on mitigation activities were indeed making the nation<br />

significantly more prepared for disasters and yielding significant savings, Congress should<br />

consider why states, localities, and private citizens are not prioritizing spending on these<br />

projects, and instead are reliant on the federal government to pay for these projects.<br />

Congress should reconsider whether FEMA’s spending on mitigation programs is<br />

necessary, effective, or even duplicative of other federal initiatives. At the very least, it should<br />

end the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program. The current administration has proposed eliminating<br />

funding for the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program, pointing to the existence of other mitigation<br />

spending within DHS, according to the Congressional Research Service. 584 The Administration<br />

also created a new competitive grant program for mitigation projects within the Department of<br />

Housing and Urban Development, raising the question of whether FEMA’s programs are<br />

duplicative of other efforts. 585<br />

581 Fran McCarthy, “FEMA Mitigation Spending,” Congressional Research Service, Memorandum to the Senate<br />

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, December 18, 2014.<br />

582 Ibid.<br />

583 “Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: An Independent Study to Assess the Future Savings from Mitigation<br />

Activities. Volume 1 – Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations,” Multihazard Mitigation Council, National<br />

Institute of Building Science, 2005.<br />

584 Francis X. McCarthy, “FEMA’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program: Overview and Issues,” Congressional Research<br />

Service, August 27, 2014.<br />

585 Ibid.<br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!