2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GIS Geographic Information System Hg mercury HNP Hatch Nuclear Power Plant hp horsepower hr hour ICW Intercoastal Waterway IFAS Institute for Food and Agricultural Science IGNS Independent Gill Net Survey IHNV infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus in inches IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources km kilometer lbs pounds LD lethal dose LHRHα luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog LNG Liquefied Natural Gas LIS Long Island Sound LRS Long River Survey m meters MADMF Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries MDFRO Maryland Fishery Resource Office MEDMR Maine Department of Marine Resources MEBOH Maine Bureau of Health MEDEP Maine Department of Environmental Protection MGD million gallons per day mg/L milligrams per liter (parts-per-million) mm millimeters MPUE mortality per unit of effort MPRSA Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act mt metric ton mtDNA mitochondrial DNA NASCO North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization NCCFWRU North Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. NCDMF North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries NCSU North Carolina State University nDNA nuclear DNA NEFC Northeast Fisheries Center (USFWS) NEFO Northeast Fisheries Observer program NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHFG New Hampshire Fish and Game NIEM Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NSBL&D New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation xi
PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls PCDDs polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins PCDF polychlorinated dibenzofurans PECE Policy for Evaluation of Conservation Efforts pers. Personal pg/g picograms-per-gram (parts-per-trillion) ppm parts-per-million ppt parts-per-thousand PVA Population Viability Analysis QSWP Quebec Society for Wildlife and Parks RIDEM Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management rkm river kilometer rm river mile SAFCO South Atlantic Fisheries Coordination Office SCDNR South Carolina Department of Natural Resources SCPSA South Carolina Public Service Authority SDCOE Savannah District of the U. S. Corp of Engineers SOC Species of Concern SPA Shore Protection Act SPOIR significant portion of its range SRT Status Review Team SSC Scientific and Statistical Committees TCDD tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin TED turtle excluder device TL total length TNC The Nature Conservancy µ micro UGA University of Georgia UME University of Maine UNCW University of North Carolina at Wilmington UPGMA Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey VMRC Virginia Marine Resources Commission VIMS Virginia Institute of Marine Science WSHV-2 white sturgeon herpesvirus type-2 WSIV white sturgeon iridovirus Yds yards YOY young-of-year yr year Zn zinc xii
Page 1 and 2: STATUS REVIEW OF ATLANTIC STURGEON
Page 3 and 4: Atlantic Sturgeon Status Review Tea
Page 5 and 6: 3.5.3. Artificial Propagation and A
Page 7 and 8: egion is North Carolina south throu
Page 9 and 10: Figure 12. Left: A 39 cm TL young-o
Page 11: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Page 15 and 16: Introduction 1.1. Background of the
Page 17 and 18: eplaced the native European sturgeo
Page 19 and 20: 1.3.1. Historic Overview Historical
Page 21 and 22: Atlantic sturgeon are thought to sp
Page 23 and 24: Hampshire and Maine coasts (Squiers
Page 25 and 26: eports of low dissolved oxygen (DO)
Page 27 and 28: Hudson River Valley utilities (Cent
Page 29 and 30: Carcasses of large adult fish (> 15
Page 31 and 32: through 1998. The majority of their
Page 33 and 34: The incidental capture of two juven
Page 35 and 36: 1) and Cooper (N = 3) rivers. These
Page 37 and 38: Satilla River - Georgia Sampling re
Page 39 and 40: SRT concluded that the difference i
Page 41 and 42: watershed, but the manner in which
Page 43 and 44: within a DPS are genetically divers
Page 45 and 46: test the prototype turbines (CBS Ne
Page 47 and 48: listed species do not overlap fully
Page 49 and 50: Monosson 2000, Meador et al. 2002).
Page 51 and 52: quality and tissue contaminants, 3)
Page 53 and 54: hour of the last day of dredging (K
Page 55 and 56: km of freshwater habitat (Keiffer a
Page 57 and 58: section between Haverstraw Bay and
Page 59 and 60: plant. The EPA has been considering
Page 61 and 62: Bay based on commercial landings, h
Page 63 and 64:
Both the Tar-Pamlico and Neuse rive
Page 65 and 66:
Winyah Bay and its shipping channel
Page 67 and 68:
dredging in the Santee River that w
Page 69 and 70:
compromised during hot, dry summers
Page 71 and 72:
• Cape Fear River - 64% of histor
Page 73 and 74:
overfishing. The 1996 review docume
Page 75 and 76:
Target Fisheries of Concern As ment
Page 77 and 78:
eported. It is likely, however, tha
Page 79 and 80:
River, Mid-Atlantic and New England
Page 81 and 82:
nets. As of December 2005, only 4 j
Page 83 and 84:
Penobscot River - Maine Historical
Page 85 and 86:
targeted adults during their spawni
Page 87 and 88:
fishermen (White and Armstrong 2000
Page 89 and 90:
Satilla River - Georgia Shad fishin
Page 91 and 92:
Juvenile shortnose sturgeon apparen
Page 93 and 94:
vector. The symptoms have been pres
Page 95 and 96:
that catfish and other species do p
Page 97 and 98:
In 1998, the ASMFC amended the 1990
Page 99 and 100:
While the construction of hydroelec
Page 101 and 102:
Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S
Page 103 and 104:
DO and toxic contaminants issues an
Page 105 and 106:
Artificial propagation of Atlantic
Page 107 and 108:
Since NEFC’s first successful spa
Page 109 and 110:
Commercial culture of other sturgeo
Page 111 and 112:
6) Develop monitoring programs and
Page 113 and 114:
Between 1996 and 2000, 462 hatchery
Page 115 and 116:
widely accepted as being underrepor
Page 117 and 118:
5.6. Penobscot Accord In June 2004,
Page 119 and 120:
• Toxic Contaminant Impacts and T
Page 121 and 122:
uncertainties in species’ dynamic
Page 123 and 124:
After group discussion and evaluati
Page 125 and 126:
spawning habitat likely increases t
Page 127 and 128:
7.3.5. South Atlantic DPS The SA DP
Page 129 and 130:
management plan for Atlantic sturge
Page 131 and 132:
Boyce, M. S. 1992. Population viabi
Page 133 and 134:
Dadswell, M. 1975. Mercury, DDT and
Page 135 and 136:
hopes. Ichthyology at the Florida M
Page 137 and 138:
Hoover, E. E. 1938. Biological surv
Page 139 and 140:
Connecticut River: what has been le
Page 141 and 142:
anadromous sturgeon: status and tre
Page 143 and 144:
Report Prepared for Atlantic States
Page 145 and 146:
7 pp. Post, G. W. 1987. Revised and
Page 147 and 148:
Secor, D. H. and T. E. Gunderson. 1
Page 149 and 150:
Marine Fisheries Commission. Report
Page 151 and 152:
Von Westernhagen, H., H. Rosenthal,
Page 153 and 154:
Table 1. Historic and current spawn
Page 155 and 156:
Table 3. (A) Statistical significan
Page 157 and 158:
Table 5. Analysis of Molecular Vari
Page 159 and 160:
Table 7. The percentage of riverine
Page 161 and 162:
Table 10. Bycatch and bycatch rate
Page 163 and 164:
Table 12. Significant portion of it
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 1. Reported landings of Atla
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 3. Atlantic sturgeon landing
Page 169 and 170:
Number Captured 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
Page 171 and 172:
CPUE 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1985 1986 1
Page 173 and 174:
VIMS and Independent Surveys - Numb
Page 175 and 176:
Number Captured 160 140 120 100 80
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 13. The average CPUE of Atla
Page 179 and 180:
166
Page 181 and 182:
100 49 43 St. Lawrence St. John Ken
Page 183 and 184:
0.1 chord distance units Albemarle
Page 185 and 186:
Figure 20. A map of sea surface tem
Page 187 and 188:
. Figure 22. Historic and current s
show all

2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?