2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and Wicomico/Pocomoke rivers (S. Minkkinen, USFWS, Pers. Comm. 2006). Prior to 1890,<br />
when a <strong>sturgeon</strong> fishery began, Secor (2002), using U.S. Fish Commission landings, estimated<br />
approximately 20,000 adult females inhabited the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.<br />
For the past several decades, state fishery agencies and research facilities operating in the<br />
Chesapeake Bay have conducted extensive finfish sampling surveys in the mainstem Bay and all<br />
major tributaries. These surveys occurred in all seasons and were conducted using many gear<br />
types, including trawls, seines, and gill nets. While no surveys were directed at <strong>sturgeon</strong>,<br />
incidental captures were recorded. These data supplement reports <strong>of</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> captures from<br />
commercial fishers using gill nets, pound nets, and fyke nets with occasional visual observations<br />
<strong>of</strong> large <strong>sturgeon</strong>, including carcasses found on beaches during the summer.<br />
A mixed stock analysis, performed from nDNA microsatellite markers, indicated that the<br />
Chesapeake Bay population was comprised <strong>of</strong> three main stocks: 1) Hudson River (23-30%), 2)<br />
Chesapeake Bay (0-35%), and 3) Delaware River (17-27%) (King et al. 2001). The contribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> fish with Chesapeake Bay origin fish, which had not been identified in previous genetic<br />
studies, indicates the likely existence <strong>of</strong> a reproducing population within the Bay. This is further<br />
supported and substantiated by the capture <strong>of</strong> young juveniles at the mouth <strong>of</strong> the James River<br />
and two YOY <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> captured in the river in 2002 and 2004 (Florida Museum <strong>of</strong><br />
Natural History 2004, A. Spells, USFWS, Pers. Comm. 2006).<br />
Several <strong>sturgeon</strong> sightings were made by commercial fishers and researchers between 1978 and<br />
1987 near the Susquehanna River mouth. A deep hole (19 m) on the Susquehanna River near<br />
Perryville, MD also supported a limited <strong>sturgeon</strong> fishery (R. St. Pierre, USFWS retired, Pers.<br />
Comm. 1998). Maryland DNR personnel reported a large mature female <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> in the<br />
Potomac in 1970 and another in the Nanticoke River in 1972 (H. Speir, Maryland DNR, Pers.<br />
Comm. 1998).<br />
A Virginia Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Science (VIMS) trawl survey was initiated in 1955 to investigate<br />
finfish dynamics within the Chesapeake Bay; the survey was standardized in 1979. Since 1955,<br />
40 <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> have been captured, 16 <strong>of</strong> which were captured since 1990, and two <strong>of</strong> these<br />
collections may have been YOY based on size. No fish were captured between 1990 and 1996;<br />
however, seven were captured in 1998. In subsequent years, catch declined ranging between<br />
zero and three fish per year. Similarly, American shad monitoring programs (independent stake<br />
gill net survey) also recorded a spike in <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> bycatch that peaked in 1998 (N = 34;<br />
27 from James River) and declined dramatically in later years to only one to three <strong>sturgeon</strong> being<br />
captured in each year from 2002-2004 (Figure 9). These observations could be biased by<br />
stocking 3,200 juveniles in the Nanticoke River in 1996; however, the capture <strong>of</strong> wild fish in the<br />
Maryland Reward Tagging program conducted from 1996 to present shows identical rates <strong>of</strong><br />
capture for wild fish (see additional information below and Figure 9).<br />
The Maryland reward tagging has resulted in the capture <strong>of</strong> 1,700 <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong>. Five<br />
hundred and sixty seven <strong>of</strong> these fish were hatchery fish, <strong>of</strong> which 462 were first time captures<br />
(14% recapture rate), the remaining captures (1,133) were wild (Figure 9). However, none <strong>of</strong><br />
these 1,700 <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> were considered YOY based on length data (S. Minkkinen,<br />
USFWS, Pers. Comm. 2006). Similarly, Virginia initiated a reward tagging program in 1996<br />
17