- Page 1: STATUS REVIEW OF ATLANTIC STURGEON
- Page 5 and 6: 3.5.3. Artificial Propagation and A
- Page 7 and 8: egion is North Carolina south throu
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 12. Left: A 39 cm TL young-o
- Page 11 and 12: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 13 and 14: PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbo
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction 1.1. Background of the
- Page 17 and 18: eplaced the native European sturgeo
- Page 19 and 20: 1.3.1. Historic Overview Historical
- Page 21 and 22: Atlantic sturgeon are thought to sp
- Page 23 and 24: Hampshire and Maine coasts (Squiers
- Page 25 and 26: eports of low dissolved oxygen (DO)
- Page 27 and 28: Hudson River Valley utilities (Cent
- Page 29 and 30: Carcasses of large adult fish (> 15
- Page 31 and 32: through 1998. The majority of their
- Page 33 and 34: The incidental capture of two juven
- Page 35 and 36: 1) and Cooper (N = 3) rivers. These
- Page 37 and 38: Satilla River - Georgia Sampling re
- Page 39 and 40: SRT concluded that the difference i
- Page 41 and 42: watershed, but the manner in which
- Page 43 and 44: within a DPS are genetically divers
- Page 45 and 46: test the prototype turbines (CBS Ne
- Page 47 and 48: listed species do not overlap fully
- Page 49 and 50: Monosson 2000, Meador et al. 2002).
- Page 51 and 52: quality and tissue contaminants, 3)
- Page 53 and 54:
hour of the last day of dredging (K
- Page 55 and 56:
km of freshwater habitat (Keiffer a
- Page 57 and 58:
section between Haverstraw Bay and
- Page 59 and 60:
plant. The EPA has been considering
- Page 61 and 62:
Bay based on commercial landings, h
- Page 63 and 64:
Both the Tar-Pamlico and Neuse rive
- Page 65 and 66:
Winyah Bay and its shipping channel
- Page 67 and 68:
dredging in the Santee River that w
- Page 69 and 70:
compromised during hot, dry summers
- Page 71 and 72:
• Cape Fear River - 64% of histor
- Page 73 and 74:
overfishing. The 1996 review docume
- Page 75 and 76:
Target Fisheries of Concern As ment
- Page 77 and 78:
eported. It is likely, however, tha
- Page 79 and 80:
River, Mid-Atlantic and New England
- Page 81 and 82:
nets. As of December 2005, only 4 j
- Page 83 and 84:
Penobscot River - Maine Historical
- Page 85 and 86:
targeted adults during their spawni
- Page 87 and 88:
fishermen (White and Armstrong 2000
- Page 89 and 90:
Satilla River - Georgia Shad fishin
- Page 91 and 92:
Juvenile shortnose sturgeon apparen
- Page 93 and 94:
vector. The symptoms have been pres
- Page 95 and 96:
that catfish and other species do p
- Page 97 and 98:
In 1998, the ASMFC amended the 1990
- Page 99 and 100:
While the construction of hydroelec
- Page 101 and 102:
Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S
- Page 103 and 104:
DO and toxic contaminants issues an
- Page 105 and 106:
Artificial propagation of Atlantic
- Page 107 and 108:
Since NEFC’s first successful spa
- Page 109 and 110:
Commercial culture of other sturgeo
- Page 111 and 112:
6) Develop monitoring programs and
- Page 113 and 114:
Between 1996 and 2000, 462 hatchery
- Page 115 and 116:
widely accepted as being underrepor
- Page 117 and 118:
5.6. Penobscot Accord In June 2004,
- Page 119 and 120:
• Toxic Contaminant Impacts and T
- Page 121 and 122:
uncertainties in species’ dynamic
- Page 123 and 124:
After group discussion and evaluati
- Page 125 and 126:
spawning habitat likely increases t
- Page 127 and 128:
7.3.5. South Atlantic DPS The SA DP
- Page 129 and 130:
management plan for Atlantic sturge
- Page 131 and 132:
Boyce, M. S. 1992. Population viabi
- Page 133 and 134:
Dadswell, M. 1975. Mercury, DDT and
- Page 135 and 136:
hopes. Ichthyology at the Florida M
- Page 137 and 138:
Hoover, E. E. 1938. Biological surv
- Page 139 and 140:
Connecticut River: what has been le
- Page 141 and 142:
anadromous sturgeon: status and tre
- Page 143 and 144:
Report Prepared for Atlantic States
- Page 145 and 146:
7 pp. Post, G. W. 1987. Revised and
- Page 147 and 148:
Secor, D. H. and T. E. Gunderson. 1
- Page 149 and 150:
Marine Fisheries Commission. Report
- Page 151 and 152:
Von Westernhagen, H., H. Rosenthal,
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 1. Historic and current spawn
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 3. (A) Statistical significan
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 5. Analysis of Molecular Vari
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 7. The percentage of riverine
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 10. Bycatch and bycatch rate
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 12. Significant portion of it
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 1. Reported landings of Atla
- Page 167 and 168:
Figure 3. Atlantic sturgeon landing
- Page 169 and 170:
Number Captured 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
- Page 171 and 172:
CPUE 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1985 1986 1
- Page 173 and 174:
VIMS and Independent Surveys - Numb
- Page 175 and 176:
Number Captured 160 140 120 100 80
- Page 177 and 178:
Figure 13. The average CPUE of Atla
- Page 179 and 180:
166
- Page 181 and 182:
100 49 43 St. Lawrence St. John Ken
- Page 183 and 184:
0.1 chord distance units Albemarle
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 20. A map of sea surface tem
- Page 187 and 188:
. Figure 22. Historic and current s