12.12.2012 Views

2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...

2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...

2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The following sections review the impact <strong>of</strong> dams, dredging, and water quality on <strong>Atlantic</strong><br />

<strong>sturgeon</strong> and their habitat generally. River specific information is presented, as available and<br />

applicable, following the more general discussion.<br />

3.1.1. Dams and Tidal Turbines<br />

Dams for hydropower generation and flood control can have pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on anadromous<br />

species by impeding access to spawning and foraging habitat, modifying free-flowing rivers to<br />

reservoirs, physically damaging fish on up- and down-stream migrations, and altering<br />

downstream flows and water temperatures. Patrick (unpublished data-a) estimated that<br />

nationwide, over 50,000 miles <strong>of</strong> river/lake habitat were blocked by terminal dams (those lowest<br />

in the watershed), which includes the area between the terminal dam and the next upstream<br />

impediment, along the <strong>Atlantic</strong>, Pacific, and Gulf coasts. Similarly, about 62% <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

habitat once available to American shad is now impeded by dams (W. Patrick, NMFS,<br />

unpublished data-b). A nonrandom subsample (largest impediments) <strong>of</strong> these terminal dams<br />

indicated that the majority (65%) do not <strong>of</strong>fer fish passage (Patrick unpublished data). <strong>Atlantic</strong><br />

<strong>sturgeon</strong> do not regularly use fish passage devices; only four <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> have been<br />

documented to have passed via a fish lift, as these passage facilities are not designed to<br />

accommodate adult-sized <strong>sturgeon</strong>. Three <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> were found in Lake Molutrie,<br />

SC that evidently passed the St. Stephens fish lift. The only other observed <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong><br />

using a fish passage device was recently observed in September <strong>of</strong> 2006 using the Holyoke Dam<br />

fish lift, which is located on the Connecticut River, Massachusetts. However, shortnose <strong>sturgeon</strong><br />

have been observed frequently (4.7 <strong>sturgeon</strong> per year between 1975 and 2002) to have passed the<br />

Holyoke Dam via its fish lift (Kynard 1996, Gephard and McMeney 2004).<br />

Physical damage and mortality can also occur from anadromous fish migrating through the<br />

turbines <strong>of</strong> traditional hydropower dams on their downstream migration. Though <strong>Atlantic</strong><br />

<strong>sturgeon</strong> have not been observed to use fish passage devices, tidal power plants are a potential<br />

threat to <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> migrating up- and down-stream (Dadswell and Rulifson 1994,<br />

Dadswell 2006). Tidal power plants use marine turbines, similar to windmill technology, to<br />

generate power using the force <strong>of</strong> both incoming and out-going tides. These marine turbines can<br />

strike migrating fish such as adult <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong>, thus causing physical damage or mortality;<br />

injuries or mortality can also occur via shear, pressure flux, and cavitation effects on fish during<br />

turbine passage (reviewed in Dadswell and Rulifson 1984). Currently, there are two tidal power<br />

projects in operation along the range <strong>of</strong> <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong>, with many more projects being<br />

proposed. The Annapolis River tidal power plant (Nova Scotia), built in 1982, was constructed<br />

as a demonstration site for marine STRAFLO turbines and consisted <strong>of</strong> a rock-filled dam<br />

housing the turbine and sluice gates (M. Dadswell, Arcadia University, Pers. Comm. 2006). The<br />

negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the Annapolis tidal turbine on <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> (150 – 200 cm TL) appear to<br />

be great, as the probability <strong>of</strong> lethal strike from the turbine ranges between 40 –80% (M.<br />

Dadswell, Arcadia University, Pers. Comm. 2006) and at least three severed, gravid females<br />

have been observed below the power plant (Dadswell and Rulifson 1994) (Figure 21). Within<br />

the United States, one marine turbine project has been proposed on the East River, New York<br />

(Angelo 2005, CBS News 2006). Beginning in November <strong>of</strong> 2006, an 18-month pilot project<br />

using two slow speed tidal turbines were placed in the East River to determine their impacts on<br />

marine life. Following the 18-month project four more tidal turbines are to be installed to further<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!