2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
2007 Status Review of Atlantic sturgeon - National Marine Fisheries ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
List <strong>of</strong> Figures and Photos<br />
Figure 1. Reported landings <strong>of</strong> <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> (1880 – 2000). Canadian estimates<br />
prior to 1940 only existed for the Saint John fishery. After 1940, landings data include<br />
both Saint John (a) and Saint Lawrence (b) fisheries. U.S. landings are based on<br />
NMFS data and may include shortnose <strong>sturgeon</strong> prior to 1972, as these species are<br />
difficult to differentiate. Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Smith and Clugston (1997)…………………….…... 152<br />
Figure 2. <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> landings from the Saint Lawrence River 1940 – 2005.<br />
Black bars indicate years when a 60 mt quota was in place. Landings data from 1940<br />
– 2000 were estimated from data presented in Trencia et al. (2002). There were no<br />
landings during 1970-1976………………………………………………………………… 153<br />
Figure 3. <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> landings from the Saint John River 1882 – 2002.<br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Dadswell (2006), based on data provided by Rogers (1936) and<br />
Canadian <strong>Fisheries</strong> Statistics………………………………………………………………. 154<br />
Figure 4. <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> bycatch from a standardized shortnose <strong>sturgeon</strong> survey<br />
conducted between the periods <strong>of</strong> 1977-1981 and 1998-2000 in the Kennebec River,<br />
Maine………………………………………………………………………………………. 155<br />
Figure 5. <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> captures from the Long Island Sound Trawl and<br />
Connecticut DEP surveys. These <strong>sturgeon</strong> are believed to be <strong>of</strong> Hudson River origin…… 156<br />
Figure 6. CPUE <strong>of</strong> Hudson River surveys that captured <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> by year<br />
(1974-2004) and survey……………………………………………………………………. 157<br />
Figure 7. A comparison between Hudson River CPUE within the mainstem <strong>of</strong> the<br />
river (Fall Shoals Utility) and New York Bight (New Jersey Trawl Survey) captures.<br />
The Fall Shoals Utility CPUE is multiplied by 10 to adjust the y-axis………………...…...158<br />
Figure 8. CPUE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> from the Delaware River 1991 – 2005 from<br />
three surveys. The Delaware and New Jersey Spring Gill Net Fishery reports mean<br />
#/fisher and the Lower Delaware River Gill Net Survey reports number captured/hr……. 159<br />
Figure 9. Reported catch rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> from the Chesapeake Bay (1996 –<br />
2005) by survey. VIMS Trawl data are available from 1955 to 2004, however zero<br />
<strong>sturgeon</strong> were captured between 1990 and 1996. Independent Staked Gill Net Survey<br />
data are available from 1997 to 2004.…………..………..………………………………… 160<br />
Figure 10. A 3-D scatter plot demonstrating how well York, James, and Hudson River<br />
<strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> can be differentiated from one another, using 12 locus nDNA markers... 161<br />
Figure 11. Comparison <strong>of</strong> total <strong>Atlantic</strong> <strong>sturgeon</strong> versus young-<strong>of</strong>-year captured<br />
during the NC Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Fisheries</strong>, Albemarle Sound Independent Gill Net<br />
Survey 1990 – 2006………………………………………………………………………... 162<br />
vii