13.12.2012 Views

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182<br />

Conclusion<br />

Our presented non-linear elastic-plastic fracture mechanics<br />

analysis of the fifth spill incident indicates that the high<br />

toughness of both the pipe material and the weld material<br />

necessitated the combination of extremely high axial loads<br />

(which exceeded the uniaxial yield strength of the material)<br />

and a biaxial stress state to propagate defects at the<br />

circumferential girth welds. The biaxial stress state, caused<br />

by the internal pressure, essentially increases the load<br />

needed to cause yielding in the pipe and can allow ductile<br />

tearing to occur in the girth welds before the load reaches<br />

this higher yield point for biaxial stress. A substantial axial<br />

load can cause ductile tearing of defects that are considered<br />

allowable by API 1104, since girth welds may be code<br />

compliant, but may still contain allowable deviations from<br />

the ideal condition allowed in the standard. These minor<br />

defects will ultimately provide the stress risers to initiate<br />

cracks as high loads arise. Although the exact propagation<br />

rate was not determined, it seems likely that this tearing<br />

could occur over a short time: this limits the ability of (ILI)<br />

tools in identifying these defects in a timely fashion.<br />

Currently only an ultrasound ILI with a modified sensor<br />

arrangement would reliably detect circumferential cracks<br />

within an actionable timeframe to safeguard the pipeline<br />

against potential geotechnical hazards. However, at present,<br />

insufficient evaluation has been conducted to establish the<br />

relationship between the onset of tearing and the shape,<br />

size, and orientation of welding defects. The timescales of<br />

the ductile tearing have also not been established sufficiently<br />

to rely upon periodic inspection. Hence, detailed<br />

geotechnical studies prior to construction, careful<br />

monitoring of the pipeline’s RoW, and geotechnical risk<br />

assessments appear currently to be the most comprehensive<br />

way to safeguard the integrity of the pipeline. Constructing<br />

the necessary geotechnical stabilization measures can<br />

typically mitigate geotechnical hazards.<br />

When designing pipeline systems, particularly for use in<br />

susceptible geological environments, it is important to<br />

recognize that axial loads generated from soil movement<br />

The Journal of Pipeline Engineering<br />

can be high enough to propagate relatively-small<br />

circumferential flaws and cause failure. Currently-available<br />

commercial pipeline inspection methods do not appear to<br />

provide a suitable means of detecting such flaws and<br />

guarding against failure due to propagation of these<br />

relatively-small flaws. Therefore, in susceptible geologic<br />

environments, extra attention must be given during the<br />

design phase to specifically include suitable and conservative<br />

assumptions of the external loading.<br />

References<br />

1. EGIG, 2005. Report 1970-2004. Gas pipeline incidents.<br />

6th Report of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data<br />

Group, Doc. Number EGIG 05.R.0002, December.<br />

2. PRCI, 2004. Guidelines for the seismic design and assessment<br />

of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines. Catalog No.<br />

L51927, October.<br />

3. Exponent Failure Analysis, 2007. Report: Integrity analysis<br />

of the Camisea transportation system, Peru. Submitted to<br />

the Inter-American Development Bank, June.<br />

4. A.P.S. Selvadurai, J. J. Lee, R.A.A. Todeschini, and H.F.<br />

Somes, 1983. Lateral soil resistance in soil-pipe interaction.<br />

Proc. Conf. <strong>Pipelines</strong> in adverse environments 11, San<br />

Diego, California, November.<br />

5. M. Sweeney, A. H. Gasca, M. G. Lopez, and A. C. Palmer.<br />

<strong>Pipelines</strong> and landslides in rugged terrain: a database, historic<br />

risks and pipeline vulnerability.<br />

6. Germanischer Lloyd, 2007. Report: Auditoria integral de<br />

los sistemas de transporte de gas natural y liquidos de gas<br />

natural del proyecto Camisea. Final audit report of the<br />

Ministerio de Energia y Minas del Peru, No. GLP/GLM/<br />

MEMP/726-07, October.<br />

7. Mauricio Carvalho Silva, Eduardo Hippert Jr., and Claudio<br />

Ruggieri, 2005. Experimental investigation of ductile tearing<br />

properties for API X70 and X80 pipeline steels. Proc. PVP2005<br />

2005 ASME Pressure vessels and piping division conference,<br />

July 17-21, Denver, CO, USA.<br />

8. C. Ruggieri and E. Hippert Jr., 2002. Cell model predictions<br />

of ductile fracture in damaged pipelines. Fatigue and Fracture<br />

Mechanics: 33rd Volume, ASTM STP 1417, Walter G. Reuter<br />

and Robert S. Piascik, Eds, ASTM <strong>International</strong>.<br />

Sample issue

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!