13.12.2012 Views

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

JPE - Sept09 - cover2-4.pmd - Pipes & Pipelines International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

188<br />

Specim<br />

en<br />

Maxim um<br />

strain<br />

( % ) Maxim<br />

um<br />

rotati<br />

on<br />

Foot Crest<br />

( dreg<br />

rees)<br />

pipeline operation after its regular shutdown, a rupture<br />

occurred at the foot of the wrinkle similar to the way the<br />

rupture occurred in Specimen 1.<br />

Strains and rotations<br />

As mentioned earlier, a large number of strain gauges were<br />

installed on the middle 300mm long segment of each pipe<br />

specimen to make an effort in acquiring the strain histories<br />

at critical locations of the wrinkle as wrinkle initiates and<br />

grows. The strain history for Specimen 1 is shown in Fig.5.<br />

From this figure, it can be observed that the strain at both<br />

feet of the wrinkle increased monotonically as the axial<br />

loading continued. The strain stabilized at both feet when<br />

the wrinkle came in contact from inside face of the pipe<br />

wall (Figs 3 and 5). However, for the crest, the strain<br />

increased only until when the maximum load capacity<br />

reached (point U in Figs 3 and 5). Then, the strain at the<br />

crest reduced slightly since the crest area relaxed as tension<br />

developed locally in the crest. The maximum compressive<br />

strains obtained from this specimen at the foot and at the<br />

crest of wrinkle are 13.7% and 3.6%, respectively (Table 2).<br />

It is important to note that these maximum compressive<br />

strain values were obtained from the axial load test and all<br />

the strain gauges failed and became non-functional when<br />

the wrinkle came in contact (point C in Fig.3).<br />

Inclinometers were installed on the top end plate of pipe<br />

specimens to measure the rotation that occurred during<br />

formation and growth of wrinkle. Figure 6 shows the<br />

rotation history of Specimen 1. It can be seen that the<br />

increase in rotation until initiation of wrinkle (point U)<br />

was small and it was only 0.37º. The rotation began to<br />

increase rapidly as soon as the wrinkle started to grow and<br />

the total rotation at top end of Specimen 1 reached to 3.3º<br />

until the wrinkle closed from inside pipe wall (point C in<br />

Fig.3). The change in rotation was very small once the<br />

wrinkle closed from inside pipe wall and the maximum<br />

rotation for Specimen 1 was 3.6º (Table 2).<br />

Similar behaviour in strain and rotation were also observed<br />

for Specimen 2. However, the maximum compressive<br />

strains at crest and foot of the wrinkle in Specimen 2 were<br />

4.9% and 13%, respectively. The maximum rotation at the<br />

top end of Specimen 2 was recorded at 2.8º.<br />

Maxim<br />

um<br />

load<br />

( kN)<br />

Ruptu<br />

re<br />

locati<br />

on<br />

1 13. 7<br />

3. 6<br />

3. 6<br />

1151 foot<br />

2 13. 0<br />

4. 9<br />

2. 8<br />

1176 crest<br />

Conclusions<br />

The Journal of Pipeline Engineering<br />

The following conclusions are made based on the<br />

experimental test data obtained from two tests conducted<br />

under the scope of this study. Therefore, these conclusions<br />

are limited to the pipe specimen and loading history that<br />

were applied to these two specimens.<br />

Sample issue<br />

1. Both test specimens produced wrinkle shape that<br />

look similar to the one observed in the field linepipe.<br />

Therefore, it can be concluded that the field NPS10<br />

linepipe was subjected to an eccentric axial load.<br />

The axial load might have developed due to<br />

movement of soil in the unstable slope.<br />

2. The shape of wrinkle and location of rupture of the<br />

field linepipe correlates better with those of<br />

Specimen 1. An axial load test on this specimen was<br />

undertaken in presence of internal pressure. Thus,<br />

it can be concluded that the wrinkle in field linepipe<br />

initiated and grew when it was in operation. The<br />

rupture occurred when the pipeline was being<br />

brought back to its normal operation after its<br />

scheduled shutdown.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This work was completed with financial assistance from the<br />

Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of<br />

Canada.<br />

References<br />

Table 2. Strains and rotations.<br />

American Standard (API), 2008. Specifications for Linepipe:<br />

API 5L. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC,<br />

USA.<br />

S.Das, J.R.Cheng, and D.W.Murray, 2007. Behavior of wrinkled<br />

steel pipelines subjected to cyclic axial loading. Canadian J.<br />

Civil Engineering, 34, pp 598-607.<br />

S.Das, J.J.R.Cheng, D.W.Murray, S.A.Wilkie, and Z.J.Zhou,<br />

2001. Wrinkle behavior under cyclic strain reversals in<br />

NPS12 pipe. Proc. 20th <strong>International</strong> Conference on Offshore<br />

Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Rio de Janeiro,<br />

Brazil, pp129-138.<br />

S.Das, J.J.R.Cheng, D.W.Murray, S.A.Wilkie, and Z.J.Zhou,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!