The Journal of Australian Ceramics Vol 53 No 2 July 2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Focus: Emerging<br />
From Paint to Clay<br />
Caterina Leone talks with Ben Quilty about his recen t cerami c work<br />
Caterina Leone: Why did you choose to work in ceram ics?<br />
Ben Ouilty: Clay and paint are probably the first mediums you play around with as a child; clay is a<br />
fundamental medium for an artist. I've always mucked around w ith clay though I've never actually fired<br />
anything. Well, that's not entirely true, as I have used clay to then cast and pour bronze moulds. <strong>The</strong><br />
Encouragement Award (bronze, 2010) was made from oil-based modelling clay and cast in bronze, so<br />
this project was an extension <strong>of</strong> that. Obviously, the finished artwork has come about through other's<br />
expertise, not mine, but I knew that I wanted the object to be in porcelain rather than bronze, to mimic<br />
the original object.<br />
CL: So it seems as though these works could only have been realised in clay ...<br />
SO: <strong>The</strong> material is integral to the original object and idea. It is a very material-specific project and<br />
working in ceramics, with porcelain, was the only way that the idea could have even been formed, let<br />
alone realised . <strong>The</strong> original objects weren 't porcelain; they were quite cheap, stoneware I think, so I<br />
wanted to actually make them more culturally important, more refined, more expensive, but actually<br />
destroy the functionality <strong>of</strong> the object at the same time, turning them into art. That raises a funny,<br />
fundamental question about the nature <strong>of</strong> art - you actually have to destroy the functionality <strong>of</strong><br />
something and use more expensive materials to make it and then it becomes art. But I think that's the<br />
thing ... it still does have a function; its function is as a messenger, a storyteller; so it really has a far<br />
more important function than it had before.<br />
CL: Your work then really makes that functional/non-functional idea ...<br />
BO: Dumb!<br />
CL: Well it certainly eliminates it.<br />
SO: It's not true at all. <strong>The</strong> function is to inform and create debate, and these works, I hope, do exactly<br />
that.<br />
CL: Is it strange to work with so many other people and processes not entirely in your control? That<br />
must be different to painting.<br />
BO: Good question. Alexandra (Alex) Standen really facilitated the whole thing, as well as being an<br />
inspiration . Seeing and appreciating her work prompted me to start thinking <strong>of</strong> a project I could do that<br />
involved porcelain. <strong>The</strong> way she uses porcelain, in a way treats it with such irreverence, giving it a whole<br />
new life ... made me think, " I want to use porcelain " . And so then Alex said that she wanted to be<br />
involved, and from there it got out <strong>of</strong> control! That amazing Somchai Charoen got involved, the most<br />
humble and clever man, to make the moulds and then finally Louise Martiensen ended up doing the<br />
final firings and decals. So it was certa inly a big group effort, a real collaboration. My idea was the start<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project, then all I really did was model the first object with modelling clay, and then it was swept<br />
out <strong>of</strong> my hands and those very clever people basically remade the original object into what it is now.<br />
CL: How is working in clay different to painting?<br />
SO: I very much knew what they were going to look like as completed works, and I started with an<br />
THE JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN CERAMICS JULY <strong>2014</strong> 59