12.01.2018 Views

Defence Business Issue 41

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TEAM AUSTRALIA<br />

14 November/December 2017/January 2018 <strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Business</strong><br />

The Future Submarine acquisition process<br />

By Philip Smart<br />

The Future Submarine acquisition process will prioritise Australian sovereignty<br />

and support local industry, but no one expects that every submarine component will be<br />

made in Australia.<br />

So said <strong>Defence</strong> Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group (CASG) General<br />

Manager Submarines, Rear Admiral Steve Johnson (US Navy, Retired), in his address<br />

on day one of the Submarine Institute of Australia’s (SIA) fourth Submarine Science,<br />

Technology and Engineering Conference (SubSTEC4), held in Adelaide in November.<br />

Presenting as a keynote speaker, Johnson detailed the steps taken and<br />

strategy of establishing an enduring Australian industrial base and emphasised the<br />

Commonwealth’s intent to maximise local industry content.<br />

“There will be some items that we just never build here,” Johnson told the<br />

Adelaide audience. “A practical example is the main motors; unlikely to be built here<br />

because they’re so hard to do and we need 13 over 40 years. It’s just not viable.<br />

“There will be components that we build overseas, but remember the strategy<br />

of sovereignty is that with each and every request for proposal and each and every<br />

contract that we let, the requirements for sovereignty are embedded. And so in that<br />

example of the main motor, it will be integrated here, tested here, installed here,<br />

sustained here.”<br />

Johnson said the Future Submarine experience would differ from Collins,<br />

including a “strategically longer interval to get all the lessons learned” from building<br />

the first submarine before going in to production for the remaining 11. And although<br />

the approach to every major component and system will be on a case by case basis, the<br />

acquisition process will maximise opportunities for local industry and include incentives<br />

to support the supply chain.<br />

“It will be a combination of things that we do with each contract on each<br />

subject,” Johnson said. “We’ll either start them early, allow an early delivery date,<br />

just standard business bridging techniques. I highlighted that to make sure that the<br />

small and medium enterprise representatives in the room understood from the very<br />

beginning that we know that we have to manage the industrial base.”<br />

Opened by Federal Minister for <strong>Defence</strong> Industry Christopher Pyne, the<br />

three-day conference provided a snapshot of strategies for both building Australia’s<br />

Future Submarine and maintaining the Collins Class. It saw delegates from <strong>Defence</strong>,<br />

industry and government presenting on maintaining sovereignty, building a submarine<br />

construction workforce, training, specialist technologies, submarine safety and the<br />

process Naval Group Australia will use to design the Future Submarine.<br />

“We have nearly 300 delegates from around the world, from the UK, France,<br />

America, as well as Australia,” said SIA secretary Frank Owen during the conference.<br />

“It’s been a cross section from all sorts of industries, academia and defence; we’ve had<br />

the political as well as the technical.”<br />

Along with sovereignty, the major themes of this year’s conference were<br />

highlighted as developing the future naval shipbuilding workforce and planning already<br />

underway for a Life Of Type Extension (LOTE) for several of the current Collins Class<br />

submarine fleet to secure the force’s strategic role until new submarines are in service.<br />

Head of Workforce Development for the Australian Industry Group, Megan<br />

Lilly, said ramping up a workforce for the Future Submarine and naval shipbuilding<br />

programs was a double-barrel challenge.<br />

“What we’re talking about here is a challenge of simultaneously building both<br />

the capability and the capacity of the workforce around defence industries,” Lilly<br />

said. “Often we have to focus on one or the other, but rarely do we focus on both<br />

simultaneously and in the volume that we’re going to.”<br />

She pointed to projects such as Adelaide’s coming Naval Shipbuilding College,<br />

set to begin training key entry-level trades and later higher education qualifications<br />

such as naval architecture and engineering, as an example of the infrastructure<br />

required.<br />

“The significant thing about the Naval Shipbuilding College is that it is a<br />

deliberate intervention strategy to actually try and address what is foreseen as the<br />

problem of supply and demand matching around skills required for shipbuilding and<br />

sustainment over the whole journey. And it is an attempt to try and build that capability<br />

and capacity.”<br />

Day one of the conference also saw CASG’s Director of the Collins Class<br />

Submarine Program, Brad Hajek, detail work on the proposed Life of Type Extension<br />

(LOTE) for Collins.<br />

As a measure of how submarine construction and support has become part of<br />

the Australian defence industry ecosystem, CASG’s initial Collins LOTE questionnaire<br />

sought the views of 156 companies involved in design, manufacture or repair of<br />

systems and components.<br />

From the scoping exercise <strong>Defence</strong> has identified 122 “significant activities” to<br />

be refined as part of a scoping project, including upgrades, procurement and technical<br />

What we’re talking about here<br />

is a challenge of simultaneously<br />

building both the capability and<br />

the capacity of the workforce<br />

around defence industries. Often<br />

we have to focus on one or the<br />

other, but rarely do we focus on<br />

both simultaneously and in the<br />

volume that we’re going to.”<br />

studies. Half the identified activities would centre on the Collins’ hull, mechanical and<br />

electrical systems, while 21 relate to its stealth ability and “signature”, the emissions an<br />

adversary might use to locate and track the submarine, 14 to its combat system and 12<br />

to the main propulsion system.<br />

For planning purposes the team has proposed life of type extensions for HMAS<br />

Farncomb, HMAS Collins and HMAS Waller. Each would take around two years,<br />

followed by another decade in service for each submarine with HMAS Waller the last to<br />

leave service in 2042.<br />

“Scoping studies informed the requirements necessary to safeguard against age<br />

related degradation and deterioration of the hull and platform systems and determine<br />

activities required to ensure the submarines remain effective,” Hajek said. “The<br />

scoping studies also assisted in determining aspects of normal business of sustaining<br />

the submarine fleet, which covers off on the plans for corrective maintenance and the<br />

support systems necessary to achieve the planning for all this.”<br />

For Frank Owen, the robust debate on so many subjects was validation for the<br />

conference itself.<br />

“The Institute promotes informed discussion, so these conferences play a<br />

big part in informing a range of stakeholders, including those that might have their<br />

position and assume they’re informed, but may take on a different perspective when<br />

they hear from others,” he said.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!