22.01.2018 Views

The Star: July 21, 2016

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Thursday <strong>July</strong> <strong>21</strong> <strong>2016</strong><br />

follow us on facebook.com/riseupchristchurch<br />

ews<br />

Councillors warned not to<br />

repeat ‘mistakes of the past’<br />

THERE<br />

• By Gabrielle Stuart<br />

THE CITY council is defending<br />

it’s decision to renegotiate how<br />

much it spends on anchor<br />

projects, in spite of being warned<br />

it is “repeating the mistakes of the<br />

past”.<br />

Mayor Lianne Dalziel and the<br />

current city councillors have<br />

often complained their hands<br />

are tied over the city council’s<br />

finances.<br />

This occurred because former<br />

mayor Bob Parker’s city council<br />

committed them to spend set<br />

amounts on major projects<br />

through the cost-sharing agreement<br />

with Government.<br />

However, the current city councillors<br />

plan to do the same thing<br />

to the next batch of councillors.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are currently in discussions<br />

with Government over the<br />

agreement, and expect to sign the<br />

new version by August, before the<br />

October elections.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current agreement includes<br />

city council commitments of<br />

almost $147 million to the Metro<br />

Sports Facility, $60 million to the<br />

new Central Library and $253<br />

NEGOTIATION: <strong>The</strong> city council and Government are currently<br />

renegotiating the cost sharing agreement. ​<br />

million toward a new stadium.<br />

Ms Dalziel said the discussions<br />

were not a significant renegotiation,<br />

but they were “tidying the<br />

agreement up”.<br />

She did not answer questions<br />

from <strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong> about what the<br />

consequences would be if the review<br />

was delayed, or whether she<br />

would consider delaying it until<br />

after the elections.<br />

Cr Raf Manji said delaying the<br />

discussions would be likely to<br />

hold up projects like the Metro<br />

Sports Facility.<br />

Cr Jamie Gough was part of the<br />

former city council which signed<br />

the agreement.<br />

He said it would be difficult<br />

to postpone the renegotiation,<br />

because it would take time for the<br />

new city councillors to “get their<br />

heads around the problems” after<br />

they were elected.<br />

If there were any major changes<br />

proposed to projects, he said he<br />

would vote for the renegotiation<br />

to be delayed.<br />

“If there are significant changes,<br />

it would be absurd for council<br />

VOTE TO HAVE YOUR<br />

SAY ON THE FUTURE OF<br />

CHRISTCHURCH.<br />

Enrol by 12 August at elections.org.nz<br />

to sign that off and I don’t think<br />

anyone would want to do that.”<br />

Keep Our Assets Canterbury<br />

convener Murray Horton said no<br />

matter the scale of the negotiations,<br />

the new city councillors<br />

would have to work with the new<br />

agreement when putting together<br />

budgets each year, so they needed<br />

to have a say.<br />

“This is a big, major decision<br />

which needs to be done properly,<br />

because these anchor projects<br />

will set the structure of the city<br />

for years to come.”<br />

Former community board<br />

member Rod Cameron, who is<br />

running for council this year,<br />

said the city councillors were<br />

repeating the mistakes of the<br />

past.<br />

He believed they should wait<br />

until the new council was elected,<br />

even if it meant projects were<br />

delayed.<br />

“What’s another six months<br />

when we’ve been waiting five and<br />

a half, almost six years? It’s worth<br />

being able to take that time and<br />

assess things. A rushed decision<br />

is not always the best one to<br />

take.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong><br />

Massive rates<br />

relief revealed<br />

ARE two filing cabinets<br />

at city council filled with<br />

requests for rates relief due to<br />

the earthquakes – amounting to<br />

$16 million.<br />

After the February 22, 2011<br />

earthquake, property owners<br />

were offered rates relief if their<br />

properties were left uninhabitable.<br />

About 8000 homes were redzoned<br />

by the Government after<br />

the earthquake.<br />

Information released under<br />

the Official Information Act<br />

showed that the city council had<br />

granted more than $16 million<br />

in rates remissions as a consequence<br />

of the February 22, 2011<br />

earthquake.<br />

Due to the sheer number of<br />

applications, the city council<br />

were not able to definitively find<br />

out how many properties had<br />

been granted a rates remission.<br />

It would take, estimated the city<br />

council, two weeks of staff time.<br />

But it estimated that it had<br />

processed about 8000 requests,<br />

of which 90 per cent were approved.<br />

<strong>The</strong> city council said<br />

this gave an average of about<br />

$2000 per property.<br />

“But the amount will vary<br />

considerably between different<br />

properties,” said the response.<br />

AFTER YOU FEEL<br />

AN EARTHQUAKE,<br />

CHANCES ARE<br />

YOU CHECK THE<br />

GEONET APP<br />

GeoNet helps us all to make<br />

our communities safer.<br />

We live in the shaky isles and that means we need a high-tech<br />

monitoring system to detect and measure geological hazards<br />

like earthquakes.<br />

Fifteen years ago, the Earthquake Commission collaborated<br />

with GNS Science to create the world leading GeoNet system.<br />

Today, its skilled team uses a network of more than 600 sensors<br />

across New Zealand to detect, analyse and respond to<br />

earthquakes, volcanic activity and other geological hazards.<br />

<strong>The</strong> successful partnership between EQC and GNS continues<br />

to thrive. EQC currently provides around $12 million a year in<br />

funding. In turn, GeoNet data helps EQC to assess the risks<br />

from natural hazards, and that helps keep Kiwi household levies<br />

affordable at 15c for every $100 worth of cover.<br />

GeoNet informs New Zealanders about natural hazards.<br />

Its data is vital to many diverse users from power providers and<br />

air traffic controllers to forest owners and insurers. <strong>The</strong> quality<br />

and availability of GeoNet data also attracts some of the best<br />

brains in the world, giving a boost to local research that would<br />

otherwise not be possible.<br />

GeoNet is part of EQC’s research and education programme.<br />

Find out more www.eqc.govt.nz/research/geonet.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!