low
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The first secondary production plan in Iran<br />
commenced in 1977 in Haftkel field with the<br />
application of gas injection. Then, in 1978 gas<br />
injection in Gachsaran field with the target of<br />
pressure maintenance was implemented. Gas<br />
injection to these fields are still continuing till<br />
now. Immiscible gas injection to Gachsaran, Bibi<br />
Hakimeh, Aghajari, Koupal, Marun, Pazanan,<br />
Karanj, Parsi, Haftkel and Lab Sefid and miscible<br />
gas injection to Ramshir and Darquein are<br />
currently being conducted. While there is no<br />
water injection in any of the onshore fields, IOOC<br />
conducted several water injection projects on<br />
offshore fields due to availability of seawater.<br />
Salman, Siri C, Siri D, Siri E and Balal fields are<br />
those water injected fields under supervision of<br />
IOOC. It should be noted that since these water<br />
injections are done with the main objective of<br />
pressure maintenance there may have been<br />
little studies performed to determine possible<br />
alteration of rock/fluids properties (e.g. water<br />
salinity and composition have not been optimized<br />
for wettability alteration).<br />
Table 3 provides information of water and<br />
gas volume injected to some of the onshore<br />
fields in 2014 for IOR/EOR purposes. Offshore<br />
implementation of EOR/IOR methods is more<br />
cost consuming and challenging compared to<br />
the onshore fields. Additionally, long distance<br />
between injectors and producers in offshore fields<br />
makes chemical EOR projects to be challenging.<br />
Due to access of water in offshore fields, waterbased<br />
EOR seems to be more interesting and<br />
applicable compared to onshore fields in which<br />
there is less access to water.<br />
Due to <strong>low</strong> injection rate of water and gas in most<br />
of Iranian fields (due to technical and operational<br />
issues as well as limited access to gas in onshore<br />
fields, especially in winter season), cumulative<br />
injected volume will be far less than required<br />
amount even in long periods of time. To maintain<br />
the reservoir pressure, injected volumes of water<br />
are severely small and usually have no EOR/IOR<br />
impact.<br />
Table 3: Volume of Gas and water injected to Iranian fields [8]<br />
Oil Field<br />
Haftkel (Gas Inj)<br />
Rag Sefid (Gas Inj)<br />
Marun (Gas Inj)<br />
Gachsaran (Gas Inj)<br />
Bibi Hakimeh (Gas Inj)<br />
Koupal (Gas Inj)<br />
Karanj (Gas Inj)<br />
Ramshir (Gas Inj)<br />
Parsi (Gas Inj)<br />
Pazanan (Gas Inj)<br />
Nargesi (Gas Inj)<br />
Darquein (Gas Inj)<br />
IOOC fields (Water Inj)<br />
Gas (MMm 3 /Day)<br />
0.25<br />
0.02<br />
15.12<br />
15.31<br />
3.78<br />
2.01<br />
5.61<br />
0.13<br />
2.12<br />
5.10<br />
0.11<br />
6.2<br />
295.9<br />
Saudi Arabia has injected more than 2 MMbbl of<br />
water per day just in Qawar field, since1964 [9] .<br />
This pressure maintenance activities in addition<br />
to improving composition of injected water as<br />
the tertiary recovery method have caused the<br />
production remaining at 4.5 MMbbl per day and<br />
the recovery factor of 54% which have been<br />
achieved. This in comparison with water injection<br />
of about 259.9 MMbbl per year in all of the fields<br />
of Iran shows that there is a need to modify the<br />
injection plans with new mindsets based on more<br />
detailed studies.<br />
Although it have been planned to increase the<br />
recovery factor by an amount of 2.5% by the<br />
end of fifth development plan, it might not be<br />
suitable target in comparison with other oil<br />
producing countries. It should be also considered<br />
that reduction in average production rate of<br />
Iranian fields is about 9-11 % per year. With an<br />
average recovery factor of 25% for Iranian fields<br />
and this annual decline in production rate, Iranian<br />
crude producers are only able to produce 134,400<br />
MMbbl of oil without application of any EOR<br />
technique.<br />
To maintain the reservoirs’ pressure, it’s highly<br />
important to initiate the water/gas injection<br />
projects in an appropriate time to reach the<br />
planned production targets and eliminate the<br />
possibility of irreversible losses of recoverable<br />
reserve potentials. It is vital to note that secondary<br />
and tertiary recovery methods are necessary in<br />
Iranian fields to maintain the optimum sustainable<br />
production [7] .<br />
Challenges of Implementing EOR<br />
Projects in Iran<br />
Looking into previous experiences of IOR/EOR<br />
projects in Iran, some challenges for successful<br />
implementation of projects can be determined:<br />
1. Selection of the most appropriate EOR<br />
method requires very good understanding<br />
about the residual oil and reservoir<br />
performance, advanced simulations, highqualified<br />
laboratory work as well as pilot<br />
application to verify the potential and reduce<br />
the uncertainties. It seems to be that there<br />
are limited available data for such studies,<br />
and thus the decisions have sometimes been<br />
taken based on unreliable and uncertain<br />
data. Data gathering for reservoir studies and<br />
characterization with special focus on EOR/<br />
IOR screening is commenced at the beginning<br />
stages of the field lifecycle. All the activities on<br />
reservoir have to be designed and conducted<br />
with focus on EOR methods. Rock and fluid<br />
samples of the reservoirs need to be obtained<br />
and high quality laboratorial tests must be<br />
performed from the beginning of the field<br />
development. Due to getting used to mindset<br />
of early production of easy oil in oil and gas<br />
industry in Iran, there is always several shortages<br />
in data gathering and construction of valid data<br />
bases that leads into further issues in future<br />
plans for EOR studies and implementation. This<br />
issue is more highlighted in the productionbased<br />
managerial approaches in which decision<br />
makers usually do not allocate enough time<br />
and budgets for data gathering from various<br />
parts of reservoirs [10] . Data such as amount of<br />
swept oil, un-swept regions and residual oil<br />
saturation in water/gas injection processes are<br />
vital information that are required to be known<br />
to increase the success of improvement/<br />
enhancement oil recovery methods. That is<br />
why monitoring techniques such as 4D seismic,<br />
tracer tests and repeated well logging in<br />
observation wells are highly important in such<br />
processes and are usually considered as one of<br />
the main parts of any EOR/IOR studies.<br />
2. Most of research projects in Iran oil and gas<br />
industry have been completed with no real<br />
case application. The results of these works<br />
are usually stored as leaflets and papers.<br />
Sometimes even availability of these results<br />
is problematic and requires a series of timeconsuming<br />
activities inside the governmental<br />
organizations. It is strongly required to have<br />
a systematic plan in designing, budgeting<br />
and conducting research-based projects in<br />
Iran oil ministry to have fruit-full and direct<br />
utility in Iran oil and gas industries. With a<br />
quick glance on some of the research-based<br />
projects, it could be concluded that several<br />
reasons like inappropriate and non-framed<br />
project description and scope of work, lack of<br />
required data at time of implementation and<br />
relying on incorrect assumptions, leads into<br />
a situation that results are not applicable in<br />
industry. This fact highlights the importance<br />
of introducing an effective and efficient<br />
framework for project scope definition and<br />
12 OIL INNOVATORS International Journal MAR. 2018 13