low
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eservoir engineers consider an EOR project,<br />
questions are raised concerning the detailed<br />
knowledge of the reservoir in which EOR is being<br />
considered. Such questions are often asked (and<br />
partially answered) when water flooding has<br />
occurred, but the far greater cost of any EOR<br />
process compared with water flooding puts a<br />
greater emphasis on the need for a detailed<br />
description of the reservoir to be exploited [8] .<br />
Figure 2: Characterize the heterogeneity<br />
Tracers for the determination of<br />
residual oil saturation (partitioning<br />
tracers in single well or in well-to-well<br />
experiments)<br />
Measurement of remaining oil saturation<br />
in a near well region, using a single-well<br />
chemical tracer test (SWCTT) is commonly used<br />
in the oil industry. This method exploits the time<br />
lag of back-produced ester vs. hydrolyzed alcohol.<br />
Partitioning inter-well tracer tests (PITTs), which<br />
can be used to assess inter-well oil saturation,<br />
are frequently used to investigate the presence<br />
and remediation of non-aqueous phase liquids<br />
(NAPLs) in aquifers. However PITTs are rare in the<br />
oil industry, with a few notable exceptions dating<br />
back to the 1990’s [9].<br />
Single-well chemical tracer (SWCTT)<br />
The single-well chemical tracer (SWCTT) test is an<br />
in-situ method for measuring fluid saturations in<br />
reservoirs. The most common use is the assessment<br />
of residual oil saturation (Sor) after water flood<br />
operation. When monitoring displacement of oil<br />
from a reservoir, it is important to benchmark<br />
the amount that remains fol<strong>low</strong>ing secondary<br />
recovery. SWCTT are non-destructive and can be<br />
run in either sandstone or carbonate reservoirs<br />
over widely varying formation characteristics. The<br />
test is based on injection of a partitioning tracer<br />
(i.e. an ester) into the reservoir, where part of it<br />
partitions in the remaining oil phase and the other<br />
part undergoes a hydrolysis reaction to produce<br />
a non partitioning tracer. This hydrolysis process<br />
takes place over a period of few days while the<br />
well is shut-in.<br />
Reaction for ethyl acetate is:<br />
CH 3<br />
COOCH 2<br />
CH 3<br />
+ H 2<br />
O CH 3<br />
CH 2<br />
OH + CH 3<br />
COOH<br />
i.e.<br />
Ester + Water Alcohol + Acid<br />
The well is then back-produced and wellbore<br />
samples are analyzed for tracer returns. The<br />
analysis of the f<strong>low</strong>ed-back samples are plotted<br />
as in Figure 3, where concentration vs. produced<br />
volume is generated.<br />
Figure 3: Typical tracer production curves used for interpretation<br />
from a SWCTT<br />
From the differences in arrival times (maximum<br />
of the peaks) and the partitioning coefficient<br />
value, one can obtain the remaining or residual<br />
oil saturation (ROS or Sor). The partitioning<br />
coefficient is a physical property that relates<br />
tracer concentration in oil and water phases at<br />
equilibrium as shown be<strong>low</strong>:<br />
K d<br />
=C o<br />
/C w<br />
Where, C o<br />
and C w<br />
are tracer concentrations in oil<br />
and water phase respectively.<br />
From chromatographic theory, the retardation<br />
factor (1+ β) which is equivalent to the peaks ratio<br />
Q a<br />
/Q b<br />
(Figure 3) as defined as fol<strong>low</strong>:<br />
Q<br />
Q<br />
kS<br />
= (1 + β ) =<br />
(1 − S )<br />
a d or<br />
Rearranging this formula gives:<br />
b<br />
Commonly utilized esters in SWCTTs are propyl<br />
format and ethyl acetate.<br />
β<br />
Sor<br />
=<br />
β + k<br />
The SWCTT can also be used to evaluate the<br />
effectiveness of EOR processes to mobilize<br />
residual oil (S or<br />
) or “trapped oil”. First, SWCTT<br />
is used to determine Sor to water flood. Then<br />
the EOR fluid is injected for a certain volume<br />
fol<strong>low</strong>ed by water in the test well/interval. Lastly,<br />
the SWCTT is carried out again for the second<br />
time to determine Sor to the EOR process. The<br />
results of the test will give direct indications of<br />
the effectiveness of the EOR process to mobilize<br />
residual oil [10] .<br />
d<br />
or<br />
Figure 4: The partitioning inter-well tracer test (PITT)<br />
The important features of SWCTT are summarized<br />
be<strong>low</strong> [11] :<br />
• The Sor measurement is made in situ in the<br />
water flooded layers of the target formation.<br />
The tracers can go only where the injected<br />
water goes.<br />
• Compared to coring or logging method results,<br />
the S or<br />
results are from a relatively large<br />
reservoir volume.<br />
• The S or<br />
measurement is carried out on an<br />
existing well and usually in an existing<br />
completion, which can be perforated or open<br />
hole.<br />
• Because the Sor measured actually is the<br />
volume fraction of oil in the pore space, the<br />
measurement is independent of porosity.<br />
Partitioning inter-well tracer test (PITT)<br />
The partitioning inter-well tracer test (PITT) is<br />
a non-intrusive <strong>low</strong>-cost test that can provide<br />
measurement of oil saturation in the region<br />
between injectors and producers in an oilfield.<br />
The test is run during normal operation of both<br />
injector and producer and thus neither cause loss<br />
of production nor halt of injection.<br />
Although the comparison with a SWCTT or<br />
saturation obtained from core floods are indeed<br />
useful and required as an independent verification<br />
of the PITT methodology, it should be noted that<br />
58 OIL INNOVATORS International Journal MAR. 2018 59