You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Local History<br />
Brockdish and Thorpe Abbotts: Our Valiant Heritage.<br />
© Elaine Murphy, Tim Brook and Margaret Brook.<br />
We were just chatting together at the first meeting at the new<br />
Waveney Heritage Centre about members of a local 19 th century<br />
family called Valiant. That led us to look further for clues to their<br />
history, where they lived and what happened to them. That’s<br />
really the point of joining a heritage group; members spark each<br />
other off and combine their expertise to deepen local knowledge.<br />
Initially we knew just a few snippets. Tim and Margaret had<br />
discovered, from exploring the newspaper archives, that in 1872,<br />
a 21 month old toddler, Clara Valiant, had drowned ‘in a moat’ in<br />
Brockdish. It caught their eye because the name Valiant features<br />
amongst the deeds of their cottage. And Elaine knew that there<br />
had been a well-known watch and clockmaker called Samuel<br />
Valiant who lived and worked in Brockdish in the mid 19 th<br />
century. It seemed likely they were related.<br />
Little Clara was at the house of her uncle David Valiant, aged 20,<br />
also a watchmaker, when the tragedy occurred; her mother Mary<br />
Ann (or Marian) was in the garden, probably looking after her<br />
younger baby Laura. Her uncle was in his workshop. From the<br />
1871 census it seemed likely that the house was somewhere<br />
near the centre of the village. But there are no moats in that<br />
location….or was there a moat there at one time?<br />
The Tithe Map of 1840, showing every parcel of land in the<br />
village, indeed shows a moat, an L-shaped body of water behind<br />
Rosebrook and ending at Rose Cottage, plot number 374, owned<br />
then by the Walne family at The Grove. A similar shape can be<br />
seen on the 1879 Ordnance Survey map and was still there on<br />
the 1956 OS map. But the moat has now disappeared on modern<br />
maps, perhaps filled in to give more garden space or was it thought<br />
a hazard to other children?<br />
18