06.06.2018 Views

CMCP Diversity Matters - May/June 2018

California Minority Counsel Program Diversity Matters - May/June 2018

California Minority Counsel Program Diversity Matters - May/June 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

degree of risk posed to the<br />

rights and freedoms of data<br />

subjects, and the breadth and<br />

scope of the processing. For<br />

example, some organizations<br />

are required to develop a<br />

Data Protection Information<br />

Assessment (“DPIA”) and consult<br />

with the local supervisory<br />

authority (and potentially third<br />

party organizations) regarding<br />

their internal technical and<br />

organizational measures to<br />

ensure the proper handling<br />

and security of personal data.<br />

Further, certain organizations<br />

will be required to employ<br />

the services of a data privacy<br />

officer who is under the specific<br />

mandate to ensure that the<br />

organization is compliant with<br />

the GDPR and serves in the<br />

capacity as quasi-internal<br />

regulator within the organization.<br />

These requirements, however,<br />

are not limited to EU-based<br />

organizations, and therefore<br />

may require a complete overhaul<br />

of practices within US-based<br />

companies whose practices may<br />

fall under the scope of the GDPR.<br />

Derived from a historical<br />

evolution of data privacy<br />

protection from WWII, GDPR<br />

promotes various fundamental<br />

principles such as Transparency,<br />

Fairness, and Lawfulness in<br />

processing personal data,<br />

including data minimization<br />

and proportionality to ensure<br />

that organizations only collect,<br />

use, share, combine, organize,<br />

adapt, transfer, retain, etc.<br />

personal data only to the<br />

extent necessary to fulfill the<br />

lawful purposes prescribed<br />

under the GDPR. Companies<br />

must be strategic about under<br />

what “lawful purposes” they<br />

are acquiring personal data,<br />

and may have different “lawful<br />

purposes” depending on the<br />

type of personal data they<br />

collect (i.e. employee data vs.<br />

customer data). Additionally,<br />

one must understand if one<br />

is acting in the capacity of a<br />

“controller” or “processor”<br />

as each characterization has<br />

specific legal obligations<br />

under the GDPR (and in some<br />

cases, an organization may be<br />

characterized as both).<br />

To illustrate a key element<br />

of the fairness requirement,<br />

organizations collecting data<br />

directly from data subjects are<br />

required to provide clear and<br />

easy-to-understand privacy<br />

notices at the time of collection<br />

(or if collecting indirectly from a<br />

third party, within one month of<br />

collection), specifying:<br />

• the identity and contact<br />

details of the organization<br />

and, if applicable, its data<br />

protection officer<br />

• the types of personal data<br />

being collected and the<br />

specific purposes and legal<br />

basis for processing each<br />

type of personal data<br />

• the recipients of the<br />

personal data<br />

• the organization’s intention<br />

to transfer the personal<br />

data to a third country or<br />

international organization,<br />

and whether such territory<br />

has been issued an<br />

adequacy determination by<br />

European Commission<br />

• the legitimate interests<br />

of the organization if<br />

this is the legal basis for<br />

processing the personal<br />

data<br />

• retention periods for storing<br />

personal data<br />

• disclosure of a data<br />

subject’s rights to withdraw<br />

consent at any time (if<br />

the lawful basis is derived<br />

from consent), or otherwise<br />

request access, and object<br />

to, rectify, block, restrict or<br />

demand permanent erasure<br />

of their personal data<br />

• disclosure of the data<br />

subject’s right to lodge a<br />

complaint with their local<br />

supervisory authority<br />

• the specific nature of<br />

organization’s use of<br />

automated decision making<br />

with respect to personal<br />

data and consequences<br />

thereof<br />

• if there are any statutory or<br />

contractual requirements<br />

to which the data subject<br />

is required to provide their<br />

personal data, and the<br />

implications for failing to<br />

do so<br />

16 | California Minority Counsel Program

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!