November 22
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WWW.DAILYHERITAGE.COM.GH<br />
DAILY HERITAGE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER <strong>22</strong>, 2018<br />
03<br />
2019 budget<br />
commendable<br />
RENOWED ECO-<br />
NOMIC Think Tank,<br />
the Institute for Fiscal<br />
Studies (IFS) has, after<br />
a critical examination<br />
of the 2019 Budget Statement presented<br />
by the Finance Minister,<br />
Mr Ken Ofori-Atta, commended<br />
the 2019 Budget.<br />
The IFS, however, pointed out<br />
key areas government could focus<br />
on to achieve the needed economic<br />
transformation that Ghanaians<br />
crave for.<br />
At a post-budget press conference<br />
held at the Institute’s Head<br />
Office in Accra, Leslie Dwight<br />
Mensah, Senior Economist and<br />
Research Fellow at the IFS<br />
pointed out that though the Institute<br />
supports the prominence<br />
given infrastructure in the 2019<br />
Budget, it believes there is a need<br />
to anchor Ghana’s infrastructure<br />
development on a long-term national<br />
infrastructure plan.<br />
The Research Fellow said the<br />
long-term national infrastructure<br />
plan “will identify, cost, and prioritise<br />
the country’s infrastructure<br />
requirements on a long-term basis<br />
to meet the demands of a modern,<br />
middle-income economy.<br />
The infrastructure plan itself<br />
should be based on a long-term<br />
national development plan.”<br />
Finance Minister<br />
Presenting the 2019 Budget Statement<br />
in Parliament, Mr Ofori-Atta said<br />
infrastructure, both hard and soft, was<br />
the backbone of economic development<br />
and growth, as well as a source of jobs<br />
and wealth for a majority of people.<br />
“In a rapidly changing global marketplace,<br />
traditional infrastructure like electricity<br />
and power, transport and logistics,<br />
water and sanitation, roads, highways,<br />
and railways have combined with new,<br />
mostly soft infrastructure like digitisation<br />
of government services to enable<br />
emerging economies like ours leapfrog<br />
the development path to prosperity.<br />
“Mr Speaker, this Government, is<br />
committed to embarking on an inte-<br />
• Says IFS, but cautions govt to<br />
anchor planned infrastructure<br />
dev. on long-term national plan<br />
grated infrastructural development programme<br />
across the country that will move goods, food<br />
items and people from one location to another that<br />
will create jobs and prosperity and ensure value for<br />
money for Ghana as well as position Ghana as the<br />
transportation, energy and logistics hub in the region.”<br />
The Finance Minister, for instance, said “Cabinet<br />
had given approval for the establishment of a<br />
Home-Based Airline with private sector participation<br />
to provide regional and inter-continental services<br />
for efficient movement of people, goods and<br />
services as well as promote tourism. Strategic investors<br />
will be engaged, and the airline is expected<br />
to commence operations in 2019.”<br />
Commenting on the government’s elaborate<br />
plans on infrastructure, some of which funding are<br />
not captured in the budget, the IFS said “we also<br />
want to draw attention to a recurring practice in the<br />
country whereby various amounts which are borrowed<br />
to finance infrastructure are not captured in<br />
the budget. The increase in such extra-budgetary<br />
borrowing activities has important fiscal and debt<br />
sustainability implications for the country.<br />
“There is the need therefore to control the<br />
growth of these activities and to widen the coverage<br />
of the fiscal accounts to incorporate these<br />
transactions. We believe that it would be appropriate—and<br />
indeed prudent—to align these borrowings<br />
strictly with the budget cycle. The IFS intends<br />
to examine this issue more closely to come up with<br />
necessary reform proposals to enhance fiscal transparency<br />
and long-term debt sustainability.”<br />
Below is the full presentation by the IFS:<br />
Institute for Fiscal Studies<br />
Post-2019 Budget Press Statement<br />
Introduction<br />
Ahead of the reading of the 2019 budget, IFS<br />
presented its views and expectations in key areas in<br />
a press conference. After the reading, the Institute<br />
has assessed the budget in light of its expectations.<br />
The Institute is once again meeting with the press<br />
to comment on issues it deems pertinent. The presentation<br />
will cover:<br />
Economic Growth and Job Creation;<br />
Fiscal Policy Stance and Realism of the<br />
Projections;<br />
Domestic Revenue Mobilization;<br />
“There is the need<br />
therefore to control<br />
the growth of these<br />
activities and to<br />
widen the coverage<br />
of the fiscal accounts<br />
to incorporate these<br />
transactions...”<br />
Expenditure Control and Rationalization;<br />
Infrastructure Development and financing; and<br />
Exiting IMF Financial Program and Legislating<br />
Fiscal Responsibility.<br />
Our statement is intended to contribute to the<br />
public discussions as well as the debate that will<br />
take place in Parliament prior to the approval of<br />
the budget.<br />
Economic Growth and Job Creation<br />
It is recalled that Economic Growth and Job<br />
Creating was the centrepiece of IFS’ pre-budget<br />
press briefing. The views expressed therein reflected<br />
those articulated by the Institute in a paper<br />
titled: “Strong Economic Growth and Significant<br />
Reduction in Unemployment: The Critical Issues to<br />
Address in Ghana’s 2019 Budget” and published in<br />
October.<br />
Among others, the paper pointed out that unemployment<br />
has become the most serious challenge<br />
currently confronting Ghana. To ensure<br />
significant creation of jobs and minimise the problem<br />
of unemployment and its attendant socioeconomic<br />
ills, IFS suggested that strong broad-based<br />
economic growth, driven by agricultural growth<br />
and transformation, industrialization, and the closing<br />
of the country’s infrastructure gap, is critically<br />
needed. The Institute is, therefore, happy—and, indeed,<br />
feels vindicated—to see that the 2019 Budget<br />
has included agricultural modernization, industrialization,<br />
and infrastructure development in its strategic<br />
pillars, alongside improving efficiency in<br />
revenue mobilization and protecting the public<br />
purse.<br />
IFS noted that recent growth had been driven<br />
largely by the extractives sectors, but since activities<br />
in those sectors were highly capital intensive, they<br />
had not created enough jobs. The nonoil sectors,<br />
particularly agriculture and manufacturing, which<br />
have higher capacities to generate jobs, however,<br />
had virtually stagnated in the past few years and<br />
this had compounded the unemployment problem<br />
in the country. The Institute, therefore, welcomes<br />
the attention being given these sectors in the<br />
budget. The agricultural sector should be aided by<br />
scaling up irrigation facilities, extensions services,<br />
storage and preservation facilities, and marketing<br />
facilities. Regarding industrialization, the 1D1F policy<br />
could be the fulcrum to achieve major transformation<br />
of the economy so as to reduce our<br />
dependence on imports and increase employment.<br />
The 1D1F policy, however, needs careful planning<br />
in terms of the type of products, factory sizes, locations,<br />
ownership, management, and the supplychain<br />
(or raw material base).<br />
These decisions should be informed by Ghana’s<br />
previous industrialisation experience and international<br />
best practices. To ease the burden of financing<br />
the 1D1F policy on the public purse, privateand<br />
PPP-funding options should be considered. In<br />
terms of direct creation of jobs, NABCO and the<br />
YEA programs may be important interventions to<br />
help alleviate youth unemployment, in particular.<br />
However, the capacity of the state to create large<br />
numbers of jobs on a sustainable basis is always<br />
tempered by issues of efficiency, productivity and<br />
budgetary costs. Ideally, the private sector should<br />
be spearheading growth and job creation. The<br />
Ghanaian private sector, however, remains weak,<br />
bogged down by a myriad of bottlenecks, including<br />
overly regulatory burden, poor infrastructure, high<br />
taxes, high cost of credit, high cost of public services<br />
and the general adverse effects of macroeconomic<br />
instability. It is important for government to<br />
continue to enable the private sector to drive<br />
growth and durable job creation by addressing the<br />
numerous bottlenecks mentioned above that continue<br />
to inhibit the sector.<br />
Fiscal Policy Stance and Realism<br />
of the Projections<br />
The 2019 budget indicates a policy change from<br />
fiscal consolidation to fiscal expansion. This is reflected<br />
in the projected increase in the budget<br />
deficit to 4.2% of GDP from 3.7% of GDP in<br />
2018, and follows a period of consolidation in<br />
which the deficit was also reduced from 6.5% of<br />
GDP in 2016 to 4.8% in 2017.The policy change is<br />
seen in the fact that government spending for 2019<br />
has been projected to increase significantly. In<br />
2019, government spending is projected to increase<br />
by a whopping GH₵15.62 billion, up from the increases<br />
of GH₵5.78 billion in 2017 and GH₵5.88<br />
billion in 2018. If realized, the increase in government<br />
spending in 2019 will be the highest in absolute<br />
terms in the Fourth Republic. In percentage<br />
terms, the projected increase in government expenditure<br />
of 27.0% in 2019 is the highest since 2012.<br />
While this policy reversal was not exactly anticipated<br />
by IFS, it did not come as a surprise to the<br />
Institute because the consolidation process had seriously<br />
constrained fiscal policy and affected economic<br />
growth. Therefore, it was just a matter of<br />
time that some policy stimulus would be injected<br />
into the economy.<br />
• CONTINUE ON PAGE 12