19.12.2018 Views

The production capacity of intercropped model of maize (Zea mays) with black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)

A study was conducted to investigate the intercropping of legumes with cereals in different space as an approach to improve the soil nutrient content, the forage quality and the yield of cereals. Black locust was cultivated alone and intercropped with maize as follows: 2 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (2M2R), 2 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (2M4R), 2 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (2M6R); 4 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (4M2R), 4 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (4M4R), 4 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (4M6R) and 6 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (6M2R), 6 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (6M4R), 6 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (6M6R).The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications. The results indicated significant increase of soil available phosphorus and soil organic matter in 2017 at harvest, while soil total nitrogen and soil available potassium decreased. However, total nitrogen and organic matter were higher in black locust leaves, black locust stems and maize stem. Low maize yield were founded in the major part of treatments while the highest biomass was founded in plants stem diameter. An increase is observed in maize and black locust height. Significant differences were founded in the character of black locust stem basal diameter. Also, significant differences in Chlorophyll concentration and WUE were observed.

A study was conducted to investigate the intercropping of legumes with cereals in different space as an approach to improve the soil nutrient content, the forage quality and the yield of cereals. Black locust was cultivated alone and intercropped with maize as follows: 2 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (2M2R), 2 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (2M4R), 2 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (2M6R); 4 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (4M2R), 4 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (4M4R), 4 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (4M6R) and 6 rows maize to 2 rows Black locust (6M2R), 6 rows maize to 4 rows Black locust (6M4R), 6 rows maize to 6 rows Black locust (6M6R).The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications. The results indicated significant increase of soil available phosphorus and soil organic matter in 2017 at harvest, while soil total nitrogen and soil available potassium decreased. However, total nitrogen and organic matter were higher in black locust leaves, black locust stems and maize stem. Low maize yield were founded in the major part of treatments while the highest biomass was founded in plants stem diameter. An increase is observed in maize and black locust height. Significant differences were founded in the character of black locust stem basal diameter. Also, significant differences in Chlorophyll concentration and WUE were observed.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Int. J. Agron. Agri. R.<br />

(4M4R), 4 rows <strong>maize</strong> to 6 rows Black <strong>locust</strong> (4M6R)<br />

and 6 rows <strong>maize</strong> to 2 rows Black <strong>locust</strong> (6M2R), 6<br />

rows <strong>maize</strong> to 4 rows Black <strong>locust</strong> (6M4R), 6 rows<br />

<strong>maize</strong> to 6 rows Black <strong>locust</strong> (6M6R). Fertilizers were<br />

applied to each plot before sowing at the rate <strong>of</strong> 70 kg<br />

<strong>of</strong> N ha -1 , 70 kg P2O5 ha -1 , and 70 kg <strong>of</strong> K2O ha -1 . <strong>The</strong><br />

soil characteristics <strong>of</strong> the study area are presented in<br />

Table 1.<br />

Representative soil samples were collected before the<br />

experiment started, from plough layer (0-100 cm) <strong>of</strong><br />

scattered places <strong>of</strong> the experimental area using an<br />

auger. An auger was used for soil sampling. Samples<br />

were air-dried and analyzed for total N, P and K. After<br />

harvest, soil samples were again collected for<br />

nutrients (total N, P and K) analysis. Dried samples<br />

were ground and passed through a 1-mm mesh screen<br />

and 0.25- mm-nylon screens. <strong>The</strong> soil passing<br />

through a 1- mm-screen was used for pH, while that<br />

passing through a 0.25-mm screen was used for total<br />

N and available P and K analysis. Plant samples were<br />

also collected after harvest, separated into leaves,<br />

stems and roots, air-dried and ground. A<br />

representative sample <strong>of</strong> 200g was used for<br />

laboratory chemical analysis.<br />

Trait measurement and determination <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

composition<br />

Plant height and stem diameter<br />

Plant height (cm) and stem diameter (cm) for all <strong>of</strong><br />

the treatments were measured using a precision<br />

straight edge (sword fish, China) and vernier caliper<br />

(ECV 150C, China), respectively (Zhang and others<br />

2010), and then averaged.<br />

At harvest 20 plant leaves, stems, and roots was<br />

washed separately <strong>with</strong> tap water, and then air dried<br />

determine dry biomass<br />

Leaf water status and chlorophyll content<br />

Leaf relative water content (RWC) was measured as<br />

described by Gao (2000). Fresh leave samples were<br />

cleaned <strong>with</strong> deionized water to remove any surface<br />

contamination and 100 mg fresh sample was<br />

homogenized in 25 mL acetone (80%) in dark at room<br />

temperature for 10 h.<br />

A UV/V spectrophotometer was used to measure<br />

chlorophyll concentration at 646 and 663 nm,<br />

according to method described by Harborne (1984).<br />

Photosynthetic parameters and water use efficiency<br />

(WUE)<br />

Net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal<br />

conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration were<br />

measured using a portable photosynthesis system LI-<br />

6400 (LI-COR. USA) from 9:00 am to 11:00 am on<br />

the leaves (Sheng et al., 2008). Conditions in the leaf<br />

chamber were as reference CO2 concentration = 400<br />

µmol mol −1 , PPFD = 1800 µmol m −2 s −1 , relative<br />

humidity 50-70%, and block temperature = 20 ◦ C.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> net photosynthetic per transpiration was<br />

used to measure water use efficient (WUE).<br />

Laboratory analyses<br />

Soil and plant chemical analyses, Soil pH, were<br />

performed on soil samples using the standard soil test<br />

procedures from the Chinese Ecosystem Research<br />

Network (Editorial Committee, 1996) and the Soil<br />

Science Society <strong>of</strong> China (1999). Soil pH was<br />

determined <strong>with</strong> an electrode pH-meter by using an<br />

automatic acid-base titrator (Methrom 702) in 1:5<br />

water suspensions. Soil and plants total nitrogen were<br />

measured using the Kjeldahl method, involving wet<br />

digestion <strong>of</strong> a soil sample to convert organic nitrogen<br />

to NH+4-N and then determining the nitrogen<br />

content. Soil and plants available phosphorus were<br />

determined calorimetrically after wet digestion <strong>with</strong><br />

sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and perchloric acid (HClO4).<br />

Soil and plants available potassium were measured in<br />

1 mol-L1 NH4OAc extracts by flame photometry. Dry<br />

leaves were fully milled and homogenized, and one<br />

aliquot <strong>of</strong> 500 mg was digested using hydrogen<br />

peroxide and sulfuric acid. <strong>The</strong> Kjeldahl method<br />

(Jones, 1991) was then used to determine the total<br />

nitrogen content.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>maize</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>black</strong> locus intercropping on<br />

soil were studied at different soil depths in ten<br />

treatments. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) using SPSS statistics 16.0 (IBM<br />

SPSS Statistics, USA).<br />

Wansim et al. Page 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!