FDP Jan 2019 Report

Recommendations

Info

Collaborative Activity in Class – Mr Vijay V.S Page 7 Mr Vijay V.S Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering St Joseph Engineering College Mr Vijay V.S received his Bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2005 from KVGCE Sullia and his M.Sc (Engg) by Research from VTU, in 2015. Mr Vijay has registered for PhD in 2015. He has one year of industrial experience and12 years of teaching experience. He specializes in Thermal Engineering and is also interested in studying innovative ways of teaching learning process specific to engineering courses. Collaborative Activity in Class Collaborative learning was defined in the classroom context, where students work jointly and the responsibility of learning is in the hands of the students. The basic element of collaborative learning which is accountability of individuals working in a project team was touched upon. The advantages of adopting collaborative learning in a classroom were highlighted and the audience was also informed that it helps in attaining higher order PO’s. Types of in-class collaborative activity were discussed. Ranging from simple low risk, short duration, active learning technique, to the complex, high risk, long duration, collaborative learning technique. Group formation strategies were discussed with emphasis on heterogeneous groups being better. Assessment of individuals and the whole group was discussed. Formative and summative assessments are preferable. This was illustrated through a tree diagram. The resource person shared his experience gained from IIEECP course. He selected Team Assisted Individualization. The formation of the student teams, member roles, rubrics for the activity on the subject topic taught, and process of evaluation was summarized. Posters of the work prepared by students were shared as images. Average learners greatly benefited. Session was concluded with highlights on the benefits of adopting Collaborative Learning techniques, and how it helps in promoting team work and active learning. “The session was good and the methodologies taught should be tried and implemented in the subsequent semesters.” Mr Akshay N.H Department of Mechanical Engineering
NAAC Accreditation - Prof. R C Hiremath Page 8 Dr. Rajashekhar C Hiremath Former Principal, Professor of Chemistry, K L E Society’s S. Nijalingappa College, Bangalore 560 010 Dr R.C. Hiremath is the Former Principal at K L E Society’s S. Nijalingappa College, Bangalore. Under his leadership the institution was accessed and re-accredited as “A+” Grade, with a CGPA of 3.53 on 4.0 scale. He is recognized as an expert in the NAAC accreditation process and is a trained NAAC Assessor. He has also visited several institutions all over India as a trained Peer Team Member. NAAC Accreditation The session started with comparing the NAAC with NBA accreditation processes and the functioning of NAAC. The core values of NAAC are: contributing to national development, global competition, value systems and use of technology (ICT enabled teaching). Before applying for NAAC, it is very important to understand NAAC’s vision and relate our institute’s vision with theirs. The various benefits of NAAC accreditation are: helps to know SWOC (strength, weakness, opportunities and challenges), planning and resource allocation, systematic database for performance-based funding, initiates innovation and modern methods of pedagogy, gives new sense of direction and identity, provides reliable information to public, standards in recruitment and promotes intra/inter institution relation. Understanding of old and new pedagogies, and their differences were explained. The preparation, basic requirements and stakeholders for NAAC were discussed. The three levels of NAAC assessment were explained in detail and they are: IIQA and SSR/ Letter of interest, DVV and pre-qualifier score, and on-site assessment - peer review by visiting teams and generation of result. How to prepare Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) was explained. The NAAC marks distribution pattern was presented. The seven main criteria’s and their sub criterions were discussed. The session ended with a Dr Hiremath addressing the queries of the audience. “The nuances of NAAC accreditation and its complexities were clearly listed during the session” Ms Vinitha Pasanha Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Page 1 and 2: Report - Faculty Development Progra
Page 3 and 4: Curriculum Gap Analysis, Modalities
Page 5 and 6: CO-PO Mapping and TLOs - Mr Rolen R
Page 7: Performing Impact Analysis - Ms Sup
Page 11 and 12: Emotional Intelligence - Dr Anjali
Page 13 and 14: Effective Use of Social Media - Mr
Page 15 and 16: COMMITTEES Report Committee: Ms Mi

FDP Jan 2019 Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?