02.07.2019 Views

Albemarle Tradewinds July 2019 Web Final

July Edition Now Online.

July Edition Now Online.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HRNeptune.com<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A battle of heavyweights at the Virginia ratifying convention<br />

by Tara Ross<br />

In 1788, Virginia ratifies the United States Constitution.<br />

At the time, many thought that Virginia had provided the<br />

critical 9th vote to put the Constitution into effect. They were<br />

wrong. New Hampshire provided that vote on June 21.<br />

Virginia’s ratifying convention was a battle of heavyweights.<br />

There may have been just a few strong opinions in the room.<br />

On one side of the aisle, the “Father of the Constitution,”<br />

James Madison, advocated for ratification. George Washington<br />

was not present, but he wrote letters in favor of the<br />

Constitution from home. Governor Edmund Randolph also<br />

argued for ratification, despite the fact that he’d earlier<br />

refused to sign the document as a delegate at the Constitutional<br />

Convention.<br />

On the other side sat Patrick Henry, future President James<br />

Monroe, and the author of the Virginia Declaration of Rights,<br />

George Mason. You can imagine that, given his oratorical<br />

skills and big personality, Henry’s opposition may have been<br />

the biggest obstacle.<br />

Prior to the convention, Madison wrote to Thomas Jefferson,<br />

who was then in Paris: “Mr. Henry is the great adversary who<br />

will render the event precarious. He is I find with his usual<br />

address, working up every possible interest, into a spirit of<br />

opposition.”<br />

Oh, to be a fly on the wall! Can’t you just imagine Henry passionately<br />

ranting a bit? Madison trying to counter his points in<br />

a more stoic way?<br />

Adding to the drama, the Convention had agreed to go<br />

through the Constitution “clause by clause,” but Henry<br />

seemed unable to stick with the plan. On the second day<br />

of debate, he gave a very long speech. It covers more than<br />

20 pages in Elliot’s debates! Henry concluded his tirade by<br />

noting that “I have not said the one hundred thousandth part<br />

of what I have on my mind, and wish to impart.” Yikes! No<br />

wonder Governor Randolph concluded the day by noting:<br />

“Mr. Chairman, if we go on in this irregular manner, contrary<br />

to our resolution, instead of three or six weeks, it will take us<br />

six months to decide this question.”<br />

Well, I guess so!<br />

Henry felt that the national government created by the Constitution<br />

was too strong. It was a “consolidated” one, when it<br />

should be a confederacy of states.<br />

“That this is a consolidated government,” he opined, “is<br />

demonstrably clear; and the danger of such a government is,<br />

to my mind, very striking. . . . What right had they to say, We,<br />

the people? . . . Who authorized them to speak the language<br />

of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states? States are the<br />

characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the states<br />

be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great,<br />

consolidated, national government, of the people of all the<br />

states.”<br />

In short, Anti-Federalists did not believe that the national government<br />

would remain limited. At a minimum, they wanted a<br />

Bill of Rights to reserve certain powers to the states or to the<br />

people.<br />

Madison argued that such an enumeration of rights would be<br />

actively dangerous to liberty. He asked the convention: “Can<br />

the general government exercise any power not delegated?<br />

If an enumeration be made of our rights, will it not be implied<br />

that every thing omitted is given to the general government?”<br />

It took the better part of a month, but Madison’s arguments<br />

eventually won the day. On June 25, the Convention ratified<br />

the Constitution, without requiring the addition of a Bill of<br />

Rights first. It did, however, later approve a list of proposed<br />

amendments to be recommended to the First Congress.<br />

Tara Ross is a mother, wife, writer, and retired lawyer. She is<br />

the author of The Indispensable Electoral College: How the<br />

Founders’ Plan Saves Our Country from Mob Rule,Enlightened<br />

Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College, co-author of<br />

Under God: George Washington and the Question of Church<br />

and State (with Joseph C. Smith, Jr.), & We Elect A President:<br />

The Story of our Electoral College. She is a constitutionalist,<br />

but with a definite libertarian streak! Stay tuned here for updates<br />

on pretty much anything to do with the Electoral College,<br />

George Washington, & our wonderfully rich American heritage.<br />

buymidway.com<br />

252-335-9800<br />

To order Tara’s books, go to this link:<br />

http://www.taraross.com/books/<br />

28 <strong>Albemarle</strong> <strong>Tradewinds</strong> <strong>July</strong> <strong>2019</strong> albemarletradewinds.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!