10.10.2019 Views

The Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994

The Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994

The Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Safety Valve was created in <strong>1994</strong> to reduce m<strong>and</strong>atory sentencing for drug <strong>of</strong>fenders<br />

under the following provisions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the defendant does not have more than 1 criminal history point, as determined<br />

under the sentencing guidelines;<br />

the defendant did not use violence or credible threats <strong>of</strong> violence or possess a<br />

firearm or other dangerous weapon (or induce another participant to do so) in<br />

connection with the <strong>of</strong>fense;<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fense did not result in death or serious bodily injury to any person;<br />

the defendant was not an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor <strong>of</strong> others in<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fense, as determined under the sentencing guidelines <strong>and</strong> was not<br />

engaged in a continuing criminal enterprise, as defined in section 408 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Controlled Substances <strong>Act</strong>; <strong>and</strong><br />

not later than the time <strong>of</strong> the sentencing hearing, the defendant has truthfully<br />

provided to the Government all information <strong>and</strong> evidence the defendant has<br />

concerning the <strong>of</strong>fense or <strong>of</strong>fenses that were part <strong>of</strong> the same course <strong>of</strong> conduct<br />

or <strong>of</strong> a common scheme or plan, but the fact that the defendant has no relevant<br />

or useful other information to provide or that the Government is already aware <strong>of</strong><br />

the information shall not preclude a determination by the court that the defendant<br />

has complied with this requirement.<br />

In October 2011 a report was issued to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> United States v.<br />

Booker m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum penalties on federal sentencing by the United States<br />

Sentencing Commission.[17][clarification needed]<br />

In 2013, United States Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. announced that the Justice<br />

Department would follow a new policy restricting m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum sentences in<br />

certain drug cases. Prosecutions dropped, drug enforcement agent morale dropped,<br />

<strong>and</strong> fentanyl <strong>and</strong> heroin overdoses soared, reported <strong>The</strong> Washington Post in 2019. In<br />

Alleyne v. United States (2013) the Supreme Court held that increasing a sentence past<br />

the m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum requirement must be submitted by a jury <strong>and</strong> found factual<br />

beyond a reasonable doubt. It increases the burden on the prosecutor to prove that the<br />

sentence is necessary for the individual crime by requiring that a m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum<br />

sentence be denied for defendant unless they fulfill certain criteria. Attorney General<br />

Holder held that the charges placed on an individual should reflect the uniqueness <strong>of</strong><br />

the case <strong>and</strong> consideration in assessing <strong>and</strong> fairly representing his/her given conduct.<br />

This is supposed to prevent recidivism.<br />

Criminal justice advocates in the United States argue that m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum<br />

sentences are a major cause <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> the "bottom income half to quartile" <strong>of</strong> its<br />

population from the general public. As part <strong>of</strong> police targeting <strong>and</strong> surveillance <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

harsh sentencing, m<strong>and</strong>atory sentencing <strong>of</strong>ten is proposed as "fairness" by those<br />

Page 61 <strong>of</strong> 190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!