29.10.2019 Views

Volume 25 Issue 3 - November 2019

On the slim chance you might not have already heard the news, Estonian Canadian composing giant Udo Kasemets was born the same year that Leo Thermin invented the theremin --1919. Which means this is the centenary year for both of them, and both are being celebrated in style, as Andrew Timar and MJ Buell respectively explain. And that's just a taste of a bustling November, with enough coverage of music of both the delectably substantial and delightfully silly on hand to satisfy one and all.

On the slim chance you might not have already heard the news, Estonian Canadian composing giant Udo Kasemets was born the same year that Leo Thermin invented the theremin --1919. Which means this is the centenary year for both of them, and both are being celebrated in style, as Andrew Timar and MJ Buell respectively explain. And that's just a taste of a bustling November, with enough coverage of music of both the delectably substantial and delightfully silly on hand to satisfy one and all.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REAR VIEW<br />

MIRROR<br />

Controversially<br />

Uncontroversial<br />

Porgy and Bess<br />

at the Met<br />

ROBERT HARRIS<br />

I<br />

love Porgy and Bess. I’ve loved it ever since I first<br />

heard the Leontyne Price/William Warfield RCA<br />

recording of excerpts from the opera in the mid-60s.<br />

The moment I hear that first octave gliss announcing the<br />

overture, and that thrilling Stravinsky-like syncopated<br />

ostinato that begins the score, I’m lost. And I don’t regain<br />

myself until the strange, half-apologetic sixth chord that<br />

ends the opera has sounded, after Porgy has demanded<br />

of the Catfish Row residents that they “Bring my goat!”<br />

(Stephen Sondheim claims to love this line) and Porgy is<br />

on his way to find Bess in New York.<br />

Basically, the beauty of the music simply dissolves everything I want<br />

to think and decide and judge and insist about Porgy and Bess. It all just<br />

gets lost in the overwhelming sense of joy I have in simply listening to the<br />

music, in an exalted state of thankful wonder, again and again and again.<br />

So perhaps I’m the last person who can adequately work his way<br />

through all the remarkably thorny issues that still surround, or should<br />

continue to surround this masterpiece. I say “should” because I’ve<br />

been more than a little amazed at how little controversy has attended<br />

the Metropolitan Opera’s current production of Porgy. In <strong>2019</strong>, in the<br />

middle of the era of #BlackLivesMatter, the Met has chosen to open its<br />

season with a production of an opera about black people completely<br />

written by white men, that portrays its characters as drug-addled,<br />

sexually voracious, verbally primitive stereotypes, mired in poverty and<br />

superstition, one step removed from minstrelsy, and no one seems to<br />

mind. Granted, the Met is performing the strange 2012 hybrid version of<br />

the opera, “The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess” which sands down some of<br />

the sharper racial edges of the piece (Porgy is given a dignified crutch,<br />

and thus doesn’t have to wheel around on those depressing, ridiculous<br />

carts from the local moving company that are featured in most productions),<br />

but the basic outline of the piece in its banal racial literalism, is<br />

still deeply in evidence. And everyone’s okay with that, it seems.<br />

And maybe that’s a good thing.<br />

The opposite was the case in 1959, when the movie version of<br />

Porgy and Bess premiered. The reaction to the film was so negative<br />

that it has been permanently removed from circulation, Sovietstyle.<br />

Watching the elegant Sidney Poitier and the glorious Dorothy<br />

Dandridge debase and prostitute themselves to the worst racial stereotypes<br />

imaginable, in the years just before the civil rights era, was too<br />

much to bear. Why watching Eric Owens as Porgy and Angel Blue as<br />

Bess do more or less the same thing in <strong>2019</strong> on the Met stage is not, is<br />

fascinating to contemplate.<br />

My own feeling is that, in 1959, those distorted images of black<br />

America were too painful because they were too real, too close to the<br />

surface, too close to the actual attitudes many white Americans still<br />

harboured about their black co-citizens. The discomfort is seeing<br />

these stereotypes appallingly splayed over a major Hollywood screen,<br />

with the stamp of approval such a treatment implied, was too stark.<br />

In <strong>2019</strong>, audiences, black and white, seem to feel quite differently,<br />

even as another major institution – the Metropolitan Opera – gives<br />

its nod of approval to the piece. And that’s because we have different<br />

models for black manhood and womanhood in the America of the 21st<br />

century. Not every black woman needs be a sultry Bess or a mammylike<br />

Clara. Black women can be Michelle Obama, Oprah, Toni<br />

Morrison, Serena Williams. Black men needn’t follow the trajectory<br />

of the crippled Porgy or the equally damaged Crown. Black men are<br />

Barack Obama, LeBron James, Ta-Nehisi Coates. Jay-Z. Porgy and Bess<br />

doesn’t offend or alarm black America as much anymore – perhaps –<br />

because black America isn’t afraid of those stereotypes anymore. The<br />

reality of a different black American life has rendered them impotent.<br />

Maybe.<br />

And yet, the fact remains that Porgy and Bess, the opera, is still a<br />

depressingly literal treatment of black America closer to the world of<br />

slavery than the world of #BlackLivesMatter. Porgy is still a problem,<br />

I think. Imagine a contemporary black composer and black librettist<br />

sitting down today to write an opera on black American themes. How<br />

likely is it they would come up with Porgy and Bess? Not likely at all.<br />

Then why should we revive it, and allow its old-fashioned reality to<br />

colour our contemporary lives? For all its beauty, Porgy still sits there<br />

with its dialects, and stereotypes, and problems.<br />

There is one way out. We could just assign Porgy to the period piece<br />

bin, and avoid its troubling aspects that way – recognize its great<br />

strengths as a piece of music, but chalk up its theatrical two-dimensionality<br />

to the oddities of the past, as we do with many other works<br />

of art. Put it on from time time to time; accept its limitations; declare<br />

<strong>November</strong> <strong>2019</strong> thewholenote.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!