04.08.2020 Views

ASPHALTopics | Summer 2014 | VOL 27 | NO3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The MSCR test is superior to an Elastic Recovery type test<br />

because it puts the AC to test at very high stress levels.<br />

of the AC when exposed for extended times to a constant low<br />

temperature. The reasoning for the development of this test<br />

is because in our climate the regular BBR test (part of the PG<br />

Specification) is claimed to not entirely capture the thermal<br />

stresses that accumulate in a pavement during our long and<br />

cold winters. The ExBBR test consists of conditioning beams<br />

of aged AC in a freezer for three days and measuring how<br />

much the AC stiffens over this time.<br />

The DENT test is targeting the fatigue properties of the<br />

AC in a ductile state (around room temperature). The test<br />

attempts to quantify the work required to fracture the AC in<br />

a ductile state, which is typical of fatigue failure. The testing<br />

protocol consists of several ductility-type specimens with<br />

progressively larger notches, which are tested to failure. By<br />

extrapolating the specimen cross-section to a dimension of<br />

zero, the essential and plastic works of fracture are calculated,<br />

as well as a parameter that estimates the strain tolerance of<br />

the AC (CTOD).<br />

A number of years ago, U.S. researchers developed a quick<br />

and simple test that combines the measurement of the asphalt<br />

cement stiffness and its elastic response using the DSR. This<br />

test was developed as an attempt to reduce specification<br />

proliferation and, at the same time, capture the benefits of<br />

polymer modification of the binder. The test is called Multiple<br />

Stress Creep and Recovery and has become known as the<br />

MSCR (read “massacre”) test.<br />

The MSCR test is superior to an Elastic Recovery type test<br />

because it puts the AC to test at very high stress levels. It<br />

measures more than just elasticity; it measures if the elastic<br />

response of an AC breaks down under high loads. In terms of<br />

stiffness, validation of the MSCR test has proven that it currently<br />

correlates to field rutting better than any previous AC test. In<br />

terms of polymer modification, the test was validated during<br />

the two Inter-laboratory Studies (ILS) carried out in the US.<br />

The MSCR test has since evolved into the AASHTO M332<br />

specification aimed at replacing the PG grading as it is ››<br />

For Total Lube Solutions,<br />

GO WITH THE FLO!<br />

√ Autogreasers for Your Mobile Equipment<br />

√ Fluid Handling Equipment for Your Garage<br />

√ Our Mobile Workshops Come to You<br />

CONGRATULATIONS OHMPA ON 40 YEARS!<br />

Tel 1.800.668.5458 sales@flocomponents.com www.flocomponents.com<br />

FALL <strong>2014</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!