10.09.2020 Views

ASPHALTopcs | Summer 2017 | VOL 30 | NO 2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

ESSENTIALS<br />

by Christina Wright<br />

Don’t do it!<br />

Whenever I am asked, this is my immediate response:<br />

DON’T DO IT! It has a high potential for large individual<br />

and corporate fines and is a serious offence under<br />

multiple regulations and jurisdictions. In the vast majority<br />

of cases, the individual or company has absolutely no<br />

idea of the risk of this action, which applies in both rural<br />

and urban areas.<br />

What am I talking about? Simply filling in or altering onsite<br />

natural or naturalized water bodies, such as creeks<br />

and streams, ponds and ditches, even when water is not<br />

there all the time. Alterations include, but are not limited<br />

to, diversion, widening, dredging, and damming.<br />

The key legislation that applies to this action is the<br />

Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA), enforced by the<br />

province, and the Fisheries Act, enforced by the federal<br />

government. However, many other jurisdictions may<br />

be involved such as Environment and Climate Change<br />

Canada, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry,<br />

Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Rural Affairs, and<br />

local conservation authorities.<br />

The two factors that make this a very high risk action<br />

are low burden of proof and high fines.<br />

Unlike the Environmental Protection Act, which requires a<br />

“likely” burden of proof for an adverse effect, the OWRA<br />

and Fisheries Act only require that an action may cause<br />

an impairment for a conviction. Altering a naturalized<br />

ditch or a natural creek may constitute impairment if<br />

the action interferes with any living organism that lives<br />

in or comes into contact with the water or soil around the<br />

water, changes the water colouring, causes suspended<br />

sediment in the water, and so on. Filling in a naturalized<br />

ditch or a natural creak would be permanent destruction<br />

of the water body. It is important to note that, even if<br />

these actions may not cause an on-site impairment, they<br />

may cause impairment downstream, such as alteration to<br />

an off-site fish habitat or your neighbour’s water supply.<br />

Unlike the EPA, which only has a maximum penalty, the<br />

Fisheries Act has both a minimum and maximum penalty.<br />

For a first offence, fines under the Fisheries Act can<br />

range from $15,000 to $1 million for individuals and<br />

from $75,000 to $4 million for corporations.<br />

If (even after reading this article) you still need to fill<br />

in a natural water body and/or naturalized ditch, GET<br />

PERMISSION FIRST! This can be a complicated, time<br />

consuming and expensive process involving multiple<br />

(municipal, provincial and federal) agencies. Hiring<br />

professionals to assist you is a must!<br />

Christina Wright is Environmental Compliance<br />

Specialist at BCX Environmental Consulting, a Canadian<br />

environmental engineering company specializing in<br />

providing expert environmental consulting services.<br />

SUMMER <strong>2017</strong> 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!