No. 104 - Miljøstyrelsen
No. 104 - Miljøstyrelsen
No. 104 - Miljøstyrelsen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28<br />
time unit, but this formula (as illustrated with the graph above) only applies to<br />
the average content of mercury of 4.55 mg of mercury per straight fluorescent<br />
lamp.<br />
Stahler et al. (2008) has also made measurements of release of mercury from<br />
compact fluorescent lamps in a room of around 12.7 m 2<br />
and with a floor-toceiling<br />
height of around 3 m 2 , corresponding to a volume of around 39 m 3 .<br />
The tests were made with different lamps, flooring, ventilation scenarios and<br />
cleaning scenarios. Many different tests were made, but one lamp was broken<br />
at a time after which a new test (new lamp with new flooring material etc.)<br />
was analysed. The concentration of mercury was measured at a height of<br />
around 30 cm (corresponding to the inhalation height of a child) and at a<br />
height of around 1.5 m (corresponding to the inhalation height of an adult).<br />
To simulate worst case new compact fluorescent lamps were broken with a<br />
hammer, and measurements showed a tendency to higher concentrations at<br />
30 cm height than at 1.5 m height in tests without vacuuming. This reflects<br />
that mercury vapours are very heavy and concentrate near the floor. The tests<br />
showed that when one compact fluorescent lamp broke mercury<br />
concentration in the air of the room often exceeded 0.0003 mg Hg/m 3<br />
for a<br />
period of time (corresponding to the USEPA reference long-term<br />
concentration without hazardous effects (RfC)). Short fluctuations with<br />
concentrations above 0.05 mg/m 3 (upper measurable limit) were also<br />
registered. In comparison, Danish occupational threshold limit values for<br />
mercury vapours are at 0.025 mg Hg/m 3<br />
during a workday (AT, 2007).<br />
It was seen, however, that a short period of ventilation of the room (open<br />
window) in most cases reduced the mercury concentration significantly, both<br />
in 30 cm’s height and in 1.5 m’s height. For all tests (a total of six) the<br />
concentration in 30 cm’s height decreased to below 0.0003 mg Hg/m 3 within<br />
9½ minutes after breakage of the lamp. Concentrations increased again,<br />
however, when the room was no longer ventilated, especially for some types of<br />
lamps as well as during and after vacuuming. Measurements showed that<br />
there are large differences between different types of compact fluorescent<br />
lamps, and between the period of time before mercury concentrations<br />
decrease to below 0.0003 mg/m 3<br />
.<br />
One test was also conducted with a cracked lamp instead of a broken lamp as<br />
well as one test where lamps were warm further to use. The results from these<br />
tests were similar to results from previous studies (Stahler et al., 2008).<br />
The main conclusion of the Stahler et al. (2008) study was that the release of<br />
mercury vapour is much more variable for scenarios with compact fluorescent<br />
lamps from different manufacturers than between different accident and<br />
cleaning scenarios with compact fluorescent lamps from the same<br />
manufacturer. In other words, release of mercury depends more on type of<br />
lamp, i.e. especially quantities of mercury in the lamp and it may also depend<br />
on the mercury compound found in the lamp. In the study six different<br />
brands of compact fluorescent lamps with different effect were used so results<br />
from the study are assumed to represent a general picture if a compact<br />
fluorescent lamp should break in a home.<br />
Stahler et al. (2008) is concerned about postponing cleaning after an accident<br />
with a broken compact fluorescent lamp. Three tests were made with exactly<br />
the same type of lamp, but with cleaning after 1 minute and 46 minutes after<br />
the accident. It was seen that even if the initial mercury concentration was the