An evaluation of the role of fire extinguishers
A report considering the role of a fire extinguisher in human terms identifying the gap between policy assumptions and the evidence from real fires. It considers the implications arising from this and makes a number of recommendations to create an evidence base and enhance current fire safety policies/advice.
A report considering the role of a fire extinguisher in human terms identifying the gap between policy assumptions and the evidence from real fires. It considers the implications arising from this and makes a number of recommendations to create an evidence base and enhance current fire safety policies/advice.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
249. The <strong>role</strong> and influence <strong>of</strong> case studies may also overly inflate perceived risk, despite <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are highlighted because <strong>the</strong>y are atypical. That is not to say <strong>the</strong>y do not provide a valuable<br />
learning opportunity, but so do most events which avoid bad outcomes. The chance to learn from<br />
success, when <strong>fire</strong> spread is limited, and injuries avoided should be <strong>of</strong> equal interest.<br />
250. There is much more that could be discussed in relation to risk. But for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this report, it<br />
is important to note that <strong>the</strong> guidance and advice (to pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and <strong>the</strong> public) regarding <strong>the</strong><br />
use <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>extinguishers</strong> is not informed by a complete and objective evidence base or risk<br />
framework. As a result, insufficient distinction is made <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks in relation to different groups,<br />
and, perversely, it may leave many vulnerable to worse experiences and outcomes than could be<br />
achieved for <strong>the</strong>m by a more positive and informed approach to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>extinguishers</strong>.<br />
Recommendations 9 and 10<br />
251. The <strong>fire</strong> sector needs greater clarity, consistency and transparency in relation to its approach to<br />
risk management. This should include areas such as definitions, use <strong>of</strong> evidence, risk models and<br />
<strong>evaluation</strong> processes.<br />
252. Legislation, standards, guidance and public advice should be amended to provide evidence-based<br />
and objective information in relation to <strong>the</strong> benefits and risks associated with <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> portable<br />
<strong>fire</strong> <strong>extinguishers</strong>, which are currently misrepresented.<br />
46<br />
4