Attachment 6 EDNY Hodge v Cuomo 21-cv-01421 Complaint
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 1:<strong>21</strong>-<strong>cv</strong>-014<strong>21</strong>-NGG Case MDL No. 3011 Document 1 25-6 Filed 03/17/<strong>21</strong> Filed 06/24/<strong>21</strong> Page 48 Page of 154 48 of PageID 154 #: 304<br />
NUMEROSITY<br />
348. The real Parties-in-Interest are the Class of employees of the Employers. Intervention Pg.<br />
98 Par 202.<br />
349. The number of members of the Class are essentially unenumerable but are not<br />
indeterminate. The members of the Class can be identified by payroll records, 940 and<br />
941 reports to the Internal Revenue Service, and NYS 45 Reports to the State of New York<br />
filed by the Employers. Intervention Pg. 98 Par 203.<br />
350. The number of members of the Percy Class are essentially unenumerable but are not<br />
indeterminate and have been identified in the Percy v. Brennan action Case 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279<br />
being enforced here.<br />
351. There are two subclasses to the Class: Intervention Pg. 98 Par 204.<br />
352. First- the sub-class of the Class is all employees injured on the job while working for the<br />
Employers. Intervention Pg. 98 Par 204.<br />
353. Second- the sub-class of the Class is “black or Spanish-surnamed persons who are<br />
capable of performing, or capable of learning to perform” in skilled occupations (herein<br />
the “Percy Sub-Class”) entitled to apprentice training and continuing education in safety<br />
and skills. Intervention Pg. 99 Par 204.<br />
354. Both sub-classes are united in interest with the Class. Intervention Pg. 99 Par 205.<br />
355. The Class Plaintiff replaces the redacted names of persons listed as Defendant Employees<br />
in a motion to intervene in Nassau County Action 60987/2019, to protect the<br />
confidentiality of the individuals by proceeding as a Class of Employees entitled to<br />
benefits. Donna <strong>Hodge</strong>, Annette Hall, Karen Grant Williams and Alexi Arias are the class<br />
representatives of the Class Plaintiff. Intervention Pg. 99 Par 206.<br />
CLASS ACTION COMMON ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT<br />
356. There is a commonality of the members of the Class as participants in a welfare plan<br />
sponsored by the Employers, for health, disability and workers’ compensation,<br />
apprenticeship, training, continuing education, safety benefits. Intervention Pg. 99 Par<br />
207.<br />
357. Neither the State Government Agencies, State Officer Defendants nor the Owner<br />
Operator Defendants had policies and procedures in place to provide common sense<br />
control of the use of Plan assets; it was and is as though no one was monitoring the use<br />
of Plan assets to assure they benefited the Class of employees working for the Employers<br />
for whom the Plan assets were paid as represented by the Owner Operator Defendants.<br />
Detailed in this <strong>Complaint</strong> are the tens of millions of dollars represented to provide<br />
48