28.06.2021 Views

Attachment 6 EDNY Hodge v Cuomo 21-cv-01421 Complaint

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 1:<strong>21</strong>-<strong>cv</strong>-014<strong>21</strong>-NGG Case MDL No. 3011 Document 1 25-6 Filed 03/17/<strong>21</strong> Filed 06/24/<strong>21</strong> Page 60 Page of 154 60 of PageID 154 #: 316<br />

State Agencies run by the named State Officer Defendants. The liability of the Owner<br />

Operator Defendants and the State Officer Defendants who were complicit by their gross<br />

negligence or active involvement, is set forth in this Class <strong>Complaint</strong>.<br />

423. Defendant Governor and his Government Agencies are implicated dating back to the<br />

failed settlement involving New York Executive Order 45 (9 NYCRR 3.45) upon the final<br />

and enforceable Memorandum/Order (“Memorandum/Order”) of Judge Lasker<br />

reported at 384 F Supp 800 of November 8, 1974, settled by agreement accepting<br />

Defendant New York State’s offer of Executive Order 45, but Executive Order 45 failed,<br />

and the Percy Class was never notified.<br />

424. This Cause of Action also is to enforce the relief in SDNY Case 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279 record of<br />

which was then filed by ECF in Appeal No. 17-2274 as the Docket on Appeal to the United<br />

States Second Circuit Court of Appeals.<br />

425. A ruling by District Court Judge McMahon, <strong>EDNY</strong> Case No <strong>21</strong>-<strong>cv</strong>-001366, Docket 6,<br />

<strong>Attachment</strong> 1, that Case 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279 was no longer a case and controversy having been<br />

closed, and she instructed “There will be NO REOPENING of this case. If the plaintiffs<br />

or any party wishes to file a new case, go right ahead.” docket #15 of 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279. The<br />

Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Appeal 17-2273 affirmed that Percy v. Brennan Case<br />

73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279, is final. This Cause of Action is that new case.<br />

426. This Cause of action is grounded upon the final and enforceable Memorandum/Order of<br />

Judge Lasker reported at 384 F Supp 800 of November 8, 1974, and the Settlement<br />

agreement accepting Defendant New York State’s offer of Executive Order 45 (Governor<br />

Carey’s Executive Order 45 (9 NYCRR 3.45) in settlement to resolve the issues raised in<br />

the Case 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279. Thereupon, Percy v. Brennan Case 73-<strong>cv</strong>-04279 was closed<br />

without prejudice by Judge Edelstein’s Order of May 4, 1977.<br />

427. Then the New York Court of Appeals in Fullilove v Carey (48 NY2d 826, 1979), decided<br />

together with Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, (1979), declared that Executive Order 45<br />

as promulgated by Governor Carey was an unauthorized exercise of legislative power,<br />

illegal and unconstitutional. Implementation of the provisions of said Executive Order<br />

45 was enjoined, including promulgation or enforcement of any rules and regulations<br />

issued pursuant to said Executive Order 45. The Settlement failure caused by the State<br />

of New York's actions or failure to act, are actionable, and were compounded by The State<br />

of New York's misrepresentation in failing to notify the Court and the Percy Class of the<br />

failure of the Settlement.<br />

428. The Office of the Governor and its Government Agencies have actively continued to<br />

obstruct a private solution Alternative Employment Practice demonstrated to be a less<br />

discriminatory employment practice.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!