06.09.2021 Views

Sales and Leases - A Problem-based Approach, 2016a

Sales and Leases - A Problem-based Approach, 2016a

Sales and Leases - A Problem-based Approach, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

drive of a car which the buyer is interested in purchasing, such use is not inconsistent<br />

with the seller’s ownership. Furthermore, the seller may put the buyer in a position where<br />

the buyer has no choice but to use the goods after rejection, such as continued use of a<br />

non-conforming carpet which seller has installed <strong>and</strong> refuses to remove after the buyer<br />

rejects the carpet.<br />

<strong>Problem</strong> 13-1. A farmer buys an irrigation system pump from an implement dealer. He takes it<br />

home <strong>and</strong> immediately installs it. The pump doesn’t work well, but for a period of two weeks the<br />

farmer keeps trying different things (such as repositioning the pump, cleaning the pump) to get it<br />

to work. After two weeks, the farmer notifies the seller of his rejection of the pump. Does buyer’s<br />

use of the pump for two weeks constitute an acceptance, which cuts off buyer’s right to reject?<br />

Why or why not?<br />

13.2. Effect of Acceptance. If the buyer accepts the goods, turn to § 2-607 for the effect of<br />

acceptance.<br />

13.2.1. After acceptance, the buyer must pay the contract price. UCC § 2-607(1). If the<br />

buyer has accepted in spite of a non-conformity, under § 2-717 the buyer may deduct the<br />

damages resulting from the non-conformity from the purchase price.<br />

13.2.2. Under § 2-607(2), if a buyer accepts the goods, the buyer no longer has the right<br />

to reject the goods.<br />

13.2.3. Although the buyer may have lost his right to reject the goods as a result of<br />

acceptance, the buyer still has a claim for damages if there is a non-conformity. Under<br />

§ 2-607(3)(a), after acceptance, the buyer must within a reasonable time after discovery<br />

of a breach notify the seller of the breach or be barred from any remedy.<br />

13.2.3.1. See Comment 4: the “content of the notification need merely be<br />

sufficient to let the seller know that the transaction is still troublesome <strong>and</strong> must<br />

be watched.”<br />

13.2.3.2. The courts are split on whether “remote sellers” are also required to<br />

receive notice of a breach, or if the buyer only needs to give notice of breach to<br />

her immediate seller. See Jane Massey Draper, Annotation, Sufficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

Timeliness of Buyer's Notice Under UCC § 2-607(3)(a) of Seller's Breach of<br />

Warranty, 89 A.L.R.5th 319 (2001).<br />

<strong>Problem</strong> 13-2. Buyer buys an air conditioner in July from Sears. A few days after using it, buyer<br />

discovers pools of water st<strong>and</strong>ing on the floor. He waits until September to notify Sears of the<br />

problem. Is notice reasonable? What if buyer purchases the air conditioner in November on sale,<br />

<strong>and</strong> doesn’t use it until June, at which time he notices the pools of water <strong>and</strong> immediately calls<br />

Sears <strong>and</strong> complains.<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!