- Page 2 and 3: SALES AND LEASES: A Problem-based A
- Page 6 and 7: Table of Contents About the Authors
- Page 8 and 9: 5.1. Statute of Frauds - the Genera
- Page 10 and 11: 8.3.4. Remote Sellers under UCC §
- Page 12 and 13: 12.3. Qualifications to the Perfect
- Page 14 and 15: 16.4. Buyer’s Remedy of “Cover.
- Page 16 and 17: Chapter 1. Introduction to the Unif
- Page 18 and 19: asserted in the Code itself (see [
- Page 20 and 21: (4) The requirement in § 2-511 tha
- Page 22 and 23: unfair that a court refuses enforce
- Page 24 and 25: (1) What factors should the consume
- Page 26 and 27: Problem 1-8. Number from 1 through
- Page 28 and 29: Was the court correct to distinguis
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 2. Introduction to UCC Arti
- Page 32 and 33: the sale of goods, such as the stat
- Page 34 and 35: 714 (Mich. App. 1981) (court held t
- Page 36 and 37: Advent filed a complaint in the dis
- Page 38 and 39: That a computer program may be copy
- Page 40 and 41: and available in the marketplace.
- Page 42 and 43: having knowledge or skill peculiar
- Page 44 and 45: 2.4.5.2. Section 2-207(2) regarding
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 3. Formation of a Contract
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2.4.2. Quantity. Section § 2-204
- Page 50 and 51: common law). The provision probably
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3.5.3. Section 2-206(1)(b) provid
- Page 54 and 55:
Commercial Code. Whether there are
- Page 56 and 57:
Case Notes: 1. Although UCC § 2-20
- Page 58 and 59:
a website and a little box pops up
- Page 60 and 61:
4.2.1. Section 2-207(1) requires a
- Page 62 and 63:
4.3. Second Step: Look for Language
- Page 64 and 65:
(2) the additional term materially
- Page 66 and 67:
522 U.S. 808 (1997) (arbitration pr
- Page 68 and 69:
eached orally . . . and is followed
- Page 70 and 71:
Terms. Accord Brown Machine, 770 S.
- Page 72 and 73:
Section 2-207(2) is silent on the t
- Page 74 and 75:
the approach. On the contrary, at l
- Page 76 and 77:
offered terms. And if there is nego
- Page 78 and 79:
Problem 5-1. Would the following co
- Page 80 and 81:
noted a 10 per cent discount on the
- Page 82 and 83:
All that is required is that the wr
- Page 84 and 85:
We do not mean to [imply] that term
- Page 86 and 87:
Problem 5-3. On July 10, 2014, Jack
- Page 88 and 89:
A more difficult question is whethe
- Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 6. Warranties Implied by La
- Page 92 and 93:
6.3.1 If a buyer provides specifica
- Page 94 and 95:
particular model of toaster would b
- Page 96 and 97:
etween the chowder and crackers whi
- Page 98 and 99:
unwholesomeness of the food itself,
- Page 100 and 101:
extent beyond that which would be c
- Page 102 and 103:
One of the purchasers asks for Joan
- Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 7. Express Warranties and W
- Page 106 and 107:
5. A picture of a watch with a face
- Page 108 and 109:
sorghum seed, but it didn’t grow.
- Page 110 and 111:
gets home. When the DVR breaks ten
- Page 112 and 113:
7.3.1.5.1. In any event, Home Appli
- Page 114 and 115:
merchantability is extended to thos
- Page 116 and 117:
court's reason for abolishing the p
- Page 118 and 119:
(e) in sales of any seed for planti
- Page 120 and 121:
the surrounding text of the same si
- Page 122 and 123:
does not claim title in himself (su
- Page 124 and 125:
(b) the purchase by a celebrity of
- Page 126 and 127:
Problem 8-9. Read § 108. What, if
- Page 128 and 129:
8.3.3. Alternatives. After receivin
- Page 130 and 131:
8.3.3.1. Under Alternative A, famil
- Page 132 and 133:
Problem 8-14. Jump High Inc. manufa
- Page 134 and 135:
of a consistent additional term to
- Page 136 and 137:
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge …. Columbi
- Page 138 and 139:
whether the buyer has in fact defau
- Page 140 and 141:
Problem 9-3. Betty owns a building
- Page 142 and 143:
Id. at 644. defendant for the lira,
- Page 144 and 145:
clauses such as this one are strong
- Page 146 and 147:
(1) Can the parties agree on a deli
- Page 148 and 149:
(2) Does your answer to the precedi
- Page 150 and 151:
Chapter 10. Delivery Terms and Titl
- Page 152 and 153:
10.1.2.3.2. So where do we go for g
- Page 154 and 155:
10.1.4. Common Carrier Contracts. W
- Page 156 and 157:
Rheinberg-Kellerei GMBH v. Vineyard
- Page 158 and 159:
Ted asks Outdoor Sporting Goods to
- Page 160 and 161:
10.2.2. Transferor’s Title. Secti
- Page 162 and 163:
levied on the car on behalf of Butl
- Page 164 and 165:
Id. at 266. contends its ownership
- Page 166 and 167:
Hollis v. Chamberlin, 419 S.W.2d 11
- Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 11. Impracticability (Excus
- Page 170 and 171:
11.3. Failure of Basic Assumption.
- Page 172 and 173:
(4) the promisor seasonably notifie
- Page 174 and 175:
[The court also rejected Bobby Murr
- Page 176 and 177:
performance has become commercially
- Page 178 and 179:
Transatlantic Financing Corp. v. Un
- Page 180 and 181:
4. See Lee Russ, Annotation, Imprac
- Page 182 and 183:
The facts are that the parties ente
- Page 184 and 185:
Watson Labs., Inc. v. Rhone-Poulenc
- Page 186 and 187:
preclude performance under the cont
- Page 188 and 189:
2. RPR's express obligation under P
- Page 190 and 191:
12.3.1. Section 2-602 sets out rule
- Page 192 and 193:
delivery or tender. It is ineffecti
- Page 194 and 195:
easonable time for rejection, U.C.C
- Page 196 and 197:
nor refused the offer. No mention w
- Page 198 and 199:
uyer can reject the entire contract
- Page 200 and 201:
12.7.2. Under § 2-602(2)(b), if th
- Page 202 and 203:
Chapter 13. Acceptance; Revocation
- Page 204 and 205:
13.2.4. After acceptance, the burde
- Page 206 and 207:
13.3.2.2. Another important factor
- Page 208 and 209:
attempted repairs sufficient to kee
- Page 210 and 211:
miles after revocation was found to
- Page 212 and 213:
Problem 13-4. Whoopie Cereals purch
- Page 214 and 215:
Problem 14-3. Sally has agreed to p
- Page 216 and 217:
constitute reasonable grounds which
- Page 218 and 219:
On May 1, 1969, AMF met with McDona
- Page 220 and 221:
Case Notes: 1. When did someone fir
- Page 222 and 223:
14.6.2. An effective retraction rei
- Page 224 and 225:
Chapter 15. Common Law Remedy Princ
- Page 226 and 227:
end that the aggrieved party may be
- Page 228 and 229:
15.1.4.4. The terms “general dama
- Page 230 and 231:
in certain circumstances, the right
- Page 232 and 233:
Problem 15-11. Dollar Store decides
- Page 234 and 235:
everse. Kenco buys mobile homes fro
- Page 236 and 237:
esell them on the open market; subs
- Page 238 and 239:
Chapter 16. Buyer Remedies under th
- Page 240 and 241:
Schroeder v. Barth, Inc. 969 F.2d 4
- Page 242 and 243:
e.g., Indiana Ins. Co. v. Plummer P
- Page 244 and 245:
a condition precedent to any recove
- Page 246 and 247:
the manufacturer under the particul
- Page 248 and 249:
ottles of wine instead of 12 bottle
- Page 250 and 251:
"We first turn our attention to the
- Page 252 and 253:
severe loss. Therefore, the actual
- Page 254 and 255:
At first blush, the result reached
- Page 256 and 257:
Chapter 17. Limitation of Remedies
- Page 258 and 259:
April and October, while almost not
- Page 260 and 261:
Pa. Super. 470, 473, 168 A.2d 750,
- Page 262 and 263:
California Civil Code § 1671. Vali
- Page 264 and 265:
Problem 17-7. An 18-year old high s
- Page 266 and 267:
In May, 1976, plaintiff LeVon Schle
- Page 268 and 269:
limitations governing the elected t
- Page 270 and 271:
18.4. Suits against Manufacturers a
- Page 272 and 273:
Spanierman prepared an invoice that
- Page 274 and 275:
exception, the warranty explicitly
- Page 276 and 277:
state a specific time period, such
- Page 278 and 279:
opinions from other jurisdictions a
- Page 280 and 281:
and the tailor says, “I’m kind
- Page 282 and 283:
Section 9-406.” The problem is th
- Page 284 and 285:
elevant to this appeal. First, each
- Page 286 and 287:
its intellectual property and trade
- Page 288 and 289:
“[t]o reveal the intent necessary
- Page 290 and 291:
University of Michigan. At the same
- Page 292 and 293:
20.3. Lease or Security Interest? S
- Page 294 and 295:
2. You cannot cancel the lease duri
- Page 296 and 297:
lessee acquires ownership, and that
- Page 298:
Note that incidental damages under