01.10.2021 Views

FALL 2021

Distributor's Link Magazine Fall 2021 / Vol 44 No 4

Distributor's Link Magazine Fall 2021 / Vol 44 No 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158<br />

THE DISTRIBUTOR’S LINK<br />

ROB LaPOINTE MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING VS. PENETRANT TESTING – WHICH TEST IS BEST? from page 100<br />

FIGURE 5 - MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING SHOWING FLUORESCENT<br />

FLUID FLOWING OVER TEST SAMPLE IN A HEAD SHOT ORIENTATION<br />

This is an easy way to visualize the relationship<br />

and to understand their directional connection. The<br />

magnetic particle test method makes use of this physical<br />

relationship. To perform the magnetic particle test, a<br />

current is conducted through the test sample (a fastener<br />

for our discussion) and a corresponding magnetic field is<br />

produced at and just below the surface of the test sample.<br />

In Figure 5, the current is traveling through the bolt from<br />

right to left so by using the right-hand rule, the magnetic<br />

field would be encircling the bolt in a clockwise direction<br />

as seen in the photo. This is the same orientation shown<br />

diagrammatically in Figure 6. As the magnetic field is<br />

created, a light oil filled with iron particles which have<br />

been coated with fluorescent material are drizzled over the<br />

test sample (Figure 5). If the magnetic field encounters a<br />

discontinuity or break in the material, the field jumps out<br />

of the material in a small loop above the discontinuity.<br />

This is known as the leakage flux and shown in Figure 6.<br />

The iron particles in the oil being drizzled over the test<br />

sample interact and are caught within this leakage flux<br />

and the fluorescent coating creates a luminous signature<br />

along the discontinuity.<br />

Using this method, only discontinuities that have<br />

component at a right angle (90°) to the magnetic field<br />

are detectable. To catch all possible discontinuities in<br />

any direction, the test sample must also be observed by<br />

creating a magnetic field that is directed along the part.<br />

This is done by placing the part inside a conductive coil<br />

which creates a magnetic field in the direction of the<br />

long axis of the bolt. The part of the test that detects<br />

discontinuities oriented along the long axis of the bolt<br />

is called the “Head Shot” and the part that detects<br />

discontinuities oriented perpendicular to the long axis of<br />

the bolt is called the “Coil Shot.” With these two shots<br />

together (head and coil), we can detect all possible<br />

surface discontinuities in a part. Figure 7 shows a<br />

quench crack caused by thermal stress during heat<br />

treatment running the length of the bolt and wrapping<br />

around the head.<br />

Penetrant testing makes use of an oily fluid that has<br />

very low viscosity and surface tension. Viscosity is a<br />

measure of a fluid’s internal friction which controls the<br />

fluid’s ability to flow. Fluids with a low viscosity flow<br />

very easily. Surface tension is a measure of a fluid’s<br />

cohesion (stickiness) to itself. Low viscosity combined<br />

with low surface tension allow penetrant to flow into very<br />

small cracks in the material.<br />

FIGURE 6 - THIS DIAGRAM SHOWS THE COMPONENTS OF<br />

THE MAGNETIC PARTICLE TEST THIS TEST ORIENTATION<br />

IS CALLED THE HEAD SHOT<br />

FIGURE 7 - QUENCH CRACK VISIBLE BY FLUORESCENT PARTICLES<br />

HELD IN MAGNETIC FIELD LOOP<br />

CONTINUED ON PAGE 172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!