24.12.2012 Views

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 <strong>The</strong> Person <strong>of</strong> the Father<br />

consideration, then we can no longer conceive the Father’s hypostasis.’102<br />

So he distances himself from the Bonaventurian view that the unbegottenness<br />

signiWes the Father’s originary plenitude: ‘This cannot be true, because then<br />

unbegottenness would not be a property distinct from paternity and spiration<br />

...:intheGodhead to be source . . . means exactly the same as to be principle<br />

<strong>of</strong> origin.’103 It is clear what is at stake in this debate about the unbegottenness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Father: it is about the relational idea <strong>of</strong> the person, that is the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relative properties (paternity, Wliation, procession) in the distinction and the<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> the hypostases or divine persons.<br />

Hence, the patristic expressions are explained by means <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

person and <strong>of</strong> relation. <strong>The</strong> Father, as Augustine puts it, is ‘principle without<br />

principle’, ‘principle <strong>of</strong> the whole divinity’, or ‘principle <strong>of</strong> the deity’. This<br />

means that, without receiving his being from another, the Father is the<br />

principle both <strong>of</strong> the Son whom he engenders and <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit who<br />

proceeds from him; he is the principle from whom the other persons come<br />

forth.104 It is to this relation <strong>of</strong> the Father to Son and Spirit that one refers<br />

when one says that the Father is ‘source’; and this is what is designated by the<br />

‘originary plenitude’ <strong>of</strong> the Father.105 When he reads in Pseudo-Denys that<br />

the Father is the ‘source <strong>of</strong> the deity’ (fons deitatis) or that the ‘originary deity’<br />

(fontana deitas) is in the Father, <strong>Thomas</strong> explains that these expressions<br />

designate the Father as ‘principle without principle’ or as ‘author’, in the<br />

way that Augustine speaks <strong>of</strong> it.106 This takes us back to the two main features<br />

<strong>of</strong> the investigation <strong>of</strong> the Father: being himself without principle, the Father<br />

is the principle <strong>of</strong> the Son and the Holy Spirit.<br />

5. FROM FATHER TO FATHER<br />

Understanding the Father as Source within the Trinity, or ‘principle without<br />

principle’, is also a good way <strong>of</strong> illuminating the economy. Taken from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> appropriation, because the Father manifests himself as Source,<br />

this characteristic <strong>of</strong> the Father carries over into the attribution <strong>of</strong> power, <strong>of</strong><br />

eternity, <strong>of</strong> creation, and <strong>of</strong> other similar features, to the person <strong>of</strong> the Father.<br />

102 I Sent. d. 28, q. 1, a. 2, ad 3. This had already been the teaching <strong>of</strong> St Albert the Great<br />

(I Sent. d. 28, a. 4). See above, in Chapter 6, ‘Relation the Heart <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trinitarian</strong> theology.’<br />

103 ST I, q. 33, a. 4, ad 1; cf. I Sent. d. 28, q. 1, a. 1 and a. 2.<br />

104 I Sent. d. 15, exp. text.; I Sent. d. 29, exp. text.; cf. for example Augustine, De Trinitate<br />

IV.XX.29.<br />

105 ST I, q. 33, a. 4, ad 1.<br />

106 In Dion. de div. nom., ch. 2, lect. 2 (no. 155); ch. 2, lect. 4 (no. 181); I Sent. d. 28, q. 1, a. 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!