24.12.2012 Views

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Trinitarian</strong> Creation and Action 343<br />

2. THE ‘EFFICACY’ OF THE TRINITARIAN PROCESSIONS<br />

In his Wrst theological synthesis, the Commentary or Writing on the Sentences,<br />

<strong>Thomas</strong> formulated this central idea: ‘the eternal processions are the cause<br />

and the rationale (causa et ratio) <strong>of</strong> the making <strong>of</strong> creatures’.14 <strong>The</strong> words<br />

cause and rationale are rounded out with other terms in order to pin down the<br />

<strong>Trinitarian</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> creation. <strong>The</strong> procession <strong>of</strong> the persons is the origin,15<br />

the principle,16 and the exemplar17 <strong>of</strong> the procession <strong>of</strong> creatures. This aYrmation<br />

is put forward as a theological exegesis <strong>of</strong> the biblical texts concerning<br />

the action <strong>of</strong> the Son and the Holy Spirit. <strong>The</strong> idea is not peripheral. One<br />

comes upon it nearly twenty times in <strong>Thomas</strong>’ works, either in the same<br />

words18 or in formulae contiguous to them: ‘the temporal procession <strong>of</strong><br />

creatures derives from the eternal procession <strong>of</strong> the persons’;19 ‘the coming<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the persons in their unity <strong>of</strong> nature is the cause <strong>of</strong> the coming out <strong>of</strong><br />

creatures in their diverse nature’.20<br />

<strong>Thomas</strong> could have learned this thesis from his teacher, Albert the Great,<br />

who formulated it in his commentary on the Sentences.21 It is also obviously<br />

inspired by Bonaventure who, without using precisely these words, also<br />

taught that the processions <strong>of</strong> the Son and Holy Spirit have a causality and<br />

exemplarity in relation to creation: the reason for the ‘extrinsic diVusion’ <strong>of</strong><br />

created goodness is the ‘intrinsic diVusion’ <strong>of</strong> the sovereign Good within<br />

the divine persons, in the way that the primary reality is the cause <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the secondary things which derive from it. But the creative causality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Trinitarian</strong> processions held far more meaning for <strong>Thomas</strong> than it had for<br />

Albert or Bonaventure: it is as if the character <strong>of</strong> his theology were shaped by<br />

its systematic mining <strong>of</strong> this thesis.22<br />

When it is addressed to the divine creative act, <strong>Thomas</strong> calls the causal<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Trinitarian</strong> processions the ‘order <strong>of</strong> creation’.23 An order is<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> a particular way in which things are related to a principle. It<br />

involves three elements.24 In relation to the created order, these are: Wrst, an<br />

14 I Sent. d. 14, q. 1, a. 1. 15 I Sent. d. 32, q. 1, a. 3. 16 I Sent. d. 35, div. text.<br />

17 I Sent. d. 29, q. 1, a. 2, qla 2; De potentia, q. 10, a. 2, sed contra 2.<br />

18 I Sent. d. 10, q. 1, a. 1; I Sent. d. 14, q. 2, a. 2; I Sent. d. 26, q. 2, a. 2, ad 2; I Sent. d. 27, q. 2,<br />

a. 3, ad 6; De potentia, q. 10, a. 2, arg. 19 and ad 19; ST I, q. 45, a. 6, sol. and ad 1; q. 45, a. 7, ad 3.<br />

19 Sent., prol.; Super Boetium de Trinitate, prol.<br />

20 I Sent. d. 2, div. text.<br />

21 Albert, I Sent. d. 20, a. 3, sed contra; I Sent. d. 29, a. 2, sed contra 2.<br />

22 We examine this at length in La Trinité créatrice, and more brieXy in ‘Trinité et création. Le<br />

principe trinitaire de la création dans les commentaires d’Albert le Grand, de Bonaventure et de<br />

<strong>Thomas</strong> d’Aquin sur les Sentences’, RSPT 79 (1995), 405–430.<br />

23 <strong>Thomas</strong> <strong>Aquinas</strong>, General Prologue to the Commentary on the Sentences.<br />

24 I Sent. d. 20, q. 1, a. 3, qla 1; cf. ST I, q. 42, a. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!