24.12.2012 Views

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Processions 69<br />

procession distinct from that <strong>of</strong> the word (the procession <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit is<br />

not the generation <strong>of</strong> the Son); (3) the procession <strong>of</strong> a term which is<br />

consubstantial to its principle (since the will <strong>of</strong> God is identical to the being<br />

<strong>of</strong> God, the Spirit which proceeds by the mode <strong>of</strong> love has the very nature <strong>of</strong><br />

God, whilst being personally distinct from the Father and the Son).83<br />

Such is the path which enables one to grasp the procession <strong>of</strong> the Holy<br />

Spirit and which by doing so, sidesteps arguments against the truth <strong>of</strong> Faith.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theologian is not content with asserting this truth, but can actually show<br />

that there is a procession which is distinct from that <strong>of</strong> the Word, thus<br />

indicating that the criticisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trinitarian</strong> faith are not compelling.<br />

6. THE ORDER OF THE TRINITARIAN PROCESSIONS<br />

ReXecting on the procession <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit creates another reWnement.<br />

It relates to the order <strong>of</strong> the processions.84 In using the analogies <strong>of</strong> mind and<br />

will, does <strong>Thomas</strong> grasp the procession <strong>of</strong> the divine persons on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

God’s mind and will, taken as essential attributes? In that case, would he not<br />

be conceiving the Son and the Spirit as somehow deriving from the divine<br />

essence? But then, the project <strong>of</strong> understanding the faith would be empty,<br />

since as <strong>Thomas</strong> himself has explained, the distinction <strong>of</strong> the persons is not<br />

drawn from the divine essence, since that essence is common to the Three.<br />

<strong>The</strong> intellect and will <strong>of</strong> God are really identical to the one single being and<br />

substance <strong>of</strong> God.85 So in God, intellect and will are a single, identical reality.<br />

But then how can one think the procession <strong>of</strong> two really distinct persons,<br />

when one uses the mode <strong>of</strong> two attributes (intellect and will or love) which<br />

are, in God, really identical? Would such an enterprise not be doomed to<br />

failure from the start?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Wrst point to clarify is that <strong>Thomas</strong> does not reserve the activity <strong>of</strong><br />

thought to the procession <strong>of</strong> the Son, nor the activity <strong>of</strong> love to the procession<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Spirit: there is no more ‘intellect’ in the begetting <strong>of</strong> the Son, nor is<br />

there ‘more love’ in the procession <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit. <strong>The</strong> begetting <strong>of</strong> the Son<br />

is also, and eminently, an act <strong>of</strong> love; and the procession <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit is<br />

not without wisdom. <strong>Thomas</strong> explains that, in each <strong>of</strong> the processions, all <strong>of</strong><br />

the divine attributes are brought into play ‘concomitantly’.86 All <strong>of</strong> the divine<br />

83 ST I, q. 27, a. 4, ad 1; cf. SCG IV, ch. 19 (no. 3563); De rationibus Wdei, ch. 4.<br />

84 This is the premier aspect in the Disputed Questions De potentia, q. 10, a. 2.<br />

85 Cf. ST I, q. 14, a. 4; q. 19, a. 1.<br />

86 I Sent. d. 6, q. 1, a. 2 and 3; cf. ST I, q. 41, a. 2; De potentia, q.2,a.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!