24.12.2012 Views

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas - El Camino ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Treatise on the Triune God 49<br />

Disputed Questions De potentia. Following the explanations given in the<br />

prologue <strong>of</strong> the treatise on the Trinity in the Summa, the study <strong>of</strong> ‘that<br />

which concerns the distinction <strong>of</strong> the persons’ is presented like this:<br />

I. THE ORIGIN OR THE PROCESSIONS (q. 27)<br />

II. THE RELATIONS OF ORIGIN (q. 28)<br />

III. THE PERSONS (qq. 29–43).<br />

(a) <strong>The</strong> persons, considered absolutely (qq. 29–38)<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> persons in their common properties (qq. 29–32)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> the name ‘person’ (q. 29)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> plurality or ‘number’ <strong>of</strong> the persons (q. 30)<br />

- Consequences <strong>of</strong> the plurality <strong>of</strong> the persons (q. 31)<br />

- Our knowledge <strong>of</strong> persons (q. 32)<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> persons in the features which are proper to each <strong>of</strong> them<br />

(qq. 33–38)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Father (q. 33)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Son (qq. 34–35)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Holy Spirit (qq. 36–38)<br />

(b) <strong>The</strong> persons, considered in comparison (qq. 39–43)<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> persons compared to the essence (q. 39)<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> persons compared to the properties (q. 40)<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> persons compared to notional acts (q. 41)<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> persons in their mutual relations (qq. 42–43)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> persons’ relations <strong>of</strong> equality and <strong>of</strong> similarity (q. 42)<br />

- <strong>The</strong> missions <strong>of</strong> the persons (q. 43).<br />

This structure does not reXect the order <strong>of</strong> our discovery <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Trinitarian</strong><br />

mystery, as one would Wnd it in the Summa Contra Gentiles or the biblical<br />

commentaries.49 And it does not oVer an historical approach which reXects<br />

the centuries-long genesis <strong>of</strong> the Church’s confessions <strong>of</strong> the Trinity. <strong>The</strong><br />

Summa <strong>The</strong>ologiae proposes a speculative understanding <strong>of</strong> the faith (intellectus<br />

Wdei) which exhibits the notions, so to speak, in the inverse order to that<br />

in which we would Wnd them out.50 This method <strong>of</strong> exposition consists in<br />

treating procession, relation, and person in their conceptual sequence, so that<br />

49 A comparison <strong>of</strong> the two Summas shows that, in the Summa <strong>The</strong>ologiae, the exposition is<br />

mainly dedicated to notions which, in the Summa contra Gentiles, are aimed at giving an<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the faith in the face <strong>of</strong> arguments against <strong>Trinitarian</strong> faith.<br />

50 In faith, we know God through his action in the world and we confess the three divine<br />

persons; then theology reWnes that the persons, in virtue <strong>of</strong> the processions (generation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Son, procession <strong>of</strong> the Spirit), are distinguished by relations. <strong>The</strong> Summa <strong>The</strong>ologiae in a sense<br />

follows the reverse order: processions, relations, persons (including the foundations <strong>of</strong> creation<br />

and grace which are studied in a detailed way in the rest <strong>of</strong> the Summa).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!