298Thompson, J. (2020). Flipping thescript: Foregrounding the architecturestudent. Charrette, 6(1), 1–8.Tobón, J., Tellez, F., & Alzate, O.(2021). Metacognition in the Wild:Metacognitive Studies in Design Education.May 2020. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2019.09128Tovey, M. (2015). Designerly thinkingand creativity. In M. Tovey (Ed.),Design Pedagogy: Developments in Artand Design Education (pp. 51–66).Tudor, R. (2008). The pedagogy ofcreativity: Understanding higher ordercapability development in design andarts education. Proceedings of the 4thInternational Barcelona Conference onHigher Education, 4, 1–19. http://www.guni-rmies.netUluoglu, B. (2000). Designknowledge communicated in studiocritiques. Design Studies, 21(1),33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00002-2van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2020).Adults’ self-regulatory behaviour profilesin blended learning environmentsand their implications for design. Technology,Knowledge and Learning, 25(3),509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9351-yVeenman, M. V. J. (2017). Learningto self-monitor and self-regulate.In P. A. Alexander & R. E. Mayer(Eds.), Handbook of Research onLearning and Instruction (2nd. Ed.,pp. 197–219). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089.ch10Vosniadou, S. (2020). Bridging secondaryand higher education - The importanceof self-regulated learning. EuropeanReview, 28(S1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720000939Voûte, E., Stappers, P. J., Giaccardi,E., Mooij, S., & van Boeijen, A. (2020).Innovating a large design educationprogram at a University of Technology.She Ji, 6(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.001Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D.(2002). Exploring students’ calibrationof self reports about study tacticsand achievement. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1World Economic Forum. (2020).Schools of the future: Defining newmodels of education for the fourth industrialrevolution. In World EconomicForum Reports. www.weforum.orgYorgancioglu, D. (2020). Criticalreflections on the surface, pedagogicaland epistemological features of thedesign studio under the “New Normal”conditions. Journal of Design Studio,2(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.744577Yorgancioglu, D., & Tunalı, S. (2020).Changing pedagogic identities of tutorsand students in the design studio:Case study of desk and peer critiques.Art, Design & Communication in HigherEducation, 19(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00011_1Zairul, M. (2018). Introducing studiooriented learning environment(sole) in upm, serdang: accessing student-centeredlearning. InternationalJournal of Architectural Research, 12(1),241–251.Zairul, M. (2020). A thematic reviewon student-centred learning in the studioeducation. Journal of Critical Reviews,7(2), 504–511.Zimmerman, B. J. (1989a). A socialcognitive view of self-regulated academiclearning. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329Zimmerman, B. J. (1989b). Modelsof self-regulated learning and academicachievement. In B. J. Zimmerman& D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-RegulatedLearning and Academic AchievementTheory, Research, and Practice (pp.1–25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_1Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulatedlearning and academic achievement:An overview. Educational Psychologist,25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainingself-regulation - A social cognitive perspective.In Handbook of Self-Regulation(pp. 13–39). Academic Press Inc.Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becominga self-regulated learner: Anoverview. Theory into Practice, 41(2),64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigatingself-regulation and motivation:Historical background, methodologicaldevelopments, and future pros-ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 2022 • A. Ates Akdeniz, G. Turan
299pects. American Educational ResearchJournal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2009).Motives to self-regulate learning: A social-cognitive account. In K. R. Wenzel& A. Wigfield (Eds.), EducationalPsychology Handbook Series. Handbookof Motivation at School (pp. 247–264).Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons,M. (1986). Development of a structuredinterview for assessing studentuse of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational ResearchJournal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons,M. (1990). Student differences inself-regulated learning: Relating grade,sex,and giftedness to self-efficacy andstrategy use. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 82(1), 51–59. http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1990-21082-001.htmlZimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A.R. (2009). Self-regulated learning:Where motivation and metacognitionintersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky,& A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook ofMetacognition in Education (pp. 1–43).New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H.(2011). Handbook of Self-Regulation ofLearning and Performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Differences in self-regulated learning strategies among industrial design students: A convergentmixed-methods study
- Page 1 and 2:
ISSN 2564-7474Vol 19 No 2 • July
- Page 3:
ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 6 and 7:
IIcolleagues, in their article “P
- Page 8 and 9:
2441. IntroductionCreative group di
- Page 10 and 11:
246Successful group discussions dis
- Page 12 and 13: 248(Putman & Paulus, 2009), and dur
- Page 14 and 15: 250discussions, which provided them
- Page 16 and 17: 252addressed, explanations made, ex
- Page 18 and 19: 254Discussions on the topic of mate
- Page 20 and 21: 256the final Round 13 (r=0,22) indi
- Page 22 and 23: 258built on. This ensured continuit
- Page 24 and 25: 260life-cycles and usage processes
- Page 26 and 27: 262tion. Design and Technology Educ
- Page 28 and 29: 2641. IntroductionIn order to train
- Page 30 and 31: 266portance in educational programs
- Page 32 and 33: 268and the other countries, in the
- Page 34 and 35: 270Table 3. “Content” recommend
- Page 36 and 37: 272Table 5. “Theme” recommendat
- Page 38 and 39: 274design studio was considered new
- Page 41 and 42: ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 43 and 44: 279SRL skills are teachable (Panade
- Page 45 and 46: 281tored for personal and social tr
- Page 47 and 48: 283grades below 77 (M=65.8, SD= 8.5
- Page 49 and 50: 285Table 5. The emerging main theme
- Page 51 and 52: Table 8. Representative quotations
- Page 53 and 54: 289ent level. Despite the significa
- Page 55 and 56: 291course. The interview findings e
- Page 57 and 58: 293self-regulation, and self-regula
- Page 59 and 60: 295Kuhn, S. (2001). Learning from t
- Page 61: 297Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning t
- Page 66 and 67: 3021. IntroductionThe public spaces
- Page 68 and 69: 304may be the source of opportuniti
- Page 70 and 71: 306The campus design checklist crea
- Page 72 and 73: 308sition variable (Table 2), 34.8%
- Page 74 and 75: 310The rate of negativity in the cl
- Page 76 and 77: 312• According to the gender vari
- Page 78 and 79: 314Strange, C.C. and Banning, J.H.(
- Page 80 and 81: 3161. IntroductionThe critical chal
- Page 82 and 83: 318The concept of sustainability is
- Page 84 and 85: 320operations, and outreach. Copern
- Page 86 and 87: 322target of urging as many univers
- Page 88 and 89: 324self-esteem are the benefits of
- Page 90 and 91: 326free water distribution, recycle
- Page 92 and 93: 328for teaching, learning, examinin
- Page 94 and 95: 330Cilliers, E. J. (2015). The impo
- Page 96 and 97: 332in higher education: Becoming be
- Page 98 and 99: 334affecting courtyards. Internatio
- Page 100 and 101: 3361. IntroductionAccording to Unit
- Page 102 and 103: 338to test the interface created in
- Page 104 and 105: 340Figure 3. The areas that form th
- Page 106 and 107: 342stormwater can not be collected
- Page 108 and 109: 344Figure 6. Project area in ITU Ay
- Page 110 and 111: 346can be used for runoff water con
- Page 112 and 113:
348Although the cost-effective crit
- Page 114 and 115:
350Gaffield, S. J., Goo, R. L., Ric
- Page 117 and 118:
ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 119 and 120:
355Many modern human-built structur
- Page 121 and 122:
357Table 2. Elements and attributes
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 4. The biophilic and non-biop
- Page 125 and 126:
361Table 6. Model summary of Linear
- Page 127 and 128:
363were employed throughout the emp
- Page 129 and 130:
365to human-made environments (Kapl
- Page 131 and 132:
367cy, J.O. (2014). 14 patterns of
- Page 133:
369[Sieve]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shor
- Page 136 and 137:
3721. IntroductionArchitecture is u
- Page 138 and 139:
374plenty of various studies on the
- Page 140 and 141:
376the modern sense of building aut
- Page 142 and 143:
3782014). BIM’s penetration of ob
- Page 144 and 145:
380produced. Thus, BIM tools make t
- Page 146 and 147:
382the data obtained from the analy
- Page 148 and 149:
384tool. BIM, as a new form of desi
- Page 151 and 152:
ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 153 and 154:
389the most spatial data. Moreover,
- Page 155 and 156:
391According to Corbusier (1929), a
- Page 157 and 158:
393psychodrama of a woman frustrate
- Page 159 and 160:
Figure 2. Robinson’s representati
- Page 161 and 162:
397First of all, the structure-envi
- Page 163:
399at architecture: Architectural h
- Page 166 and 167:
4021. IntroductionDocuments and rec
- Page 168 and 169:
404et al., 2017). Emphasising the g
- Page 170 and 171:
406nized statistical tool used to m
- Page 172 and 173:
408Table 4. Significance of strateg
- Page 174 and 175:
410third most significant error, fo
- Page 176 and 177:
412lished Masters Thesis, Dublin In
- Page 179 and 180:
ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 181 and 182:
4172. Theoretical backgroundInterio
- Page 183 and 184:
419a seminar during the workshop, a
- Page 185 and 186:
421Figure 4. Workshop: Final jury.T
- Page 187 and 188:
423Table 4. Storage design proposal
- Page 189 and 190:
425Table 6. Design proposals: Main
- Page 191:
427ISBN 978-3-631-81792-6Curry, L.A
- Page 194 and 195:
4301. IntroductionFrom the second h
- Page 196 and 197:
4323. Encountering the West: Firstt
- Page 198 and 199:
434The most remarkable part of Nasi
- Page 200 and 201:
436Figure 6. The Imperial Bank of P
- Page 202 and 203:
438information about the Eiffel Tow
- Page 204 and 205:
440The outputs of the initiatives i
- Page 206 and 207:
442384-397.Habibi, M. (2007). Az Sh
- Page 209 and 210:
ITU A|Z • Vol 19 No 2 • July 20
- Page 211 and 212:
447to do sociological evaluations o
- Page 213 and 214:
449solute break with their traditio
- Page 215 and 216:
451Figure 3. Preliminary project da
- Page 217 and 218:
453buildings were no longer necessa
- Page 219 and 220:
455Figure 9. Vertical furnace.provi
- Page 221:
457İleri, E. (2021,18,05). Gazhane
- Page 224 and 225:
4601. IntroductionStreet Art is not
- Page 226 and 227:
462and amoral practices. Semi-illeg
- Page 228 and 229:
464• Hidden and reduce significan
- Page 230 and 231:
466neighbors along with a cup of co
- Page 232 and 233:
468less impacts are observed in the
- Page 234 and 235:
470alkyd sprays on calcareous stone
- Page 236 and 237:
4721. IntroductionFootball tourname
- Page 238 and 239:
474regulations in the existing stad
- Page 240 and 241:
476situations, according to Article
- Page 242 and 243:
478Σw(m)=(Gxw)/P ⇒ Σw (m)=(3797
- Page 244 and 245:
480Total evacuation time of the upp
- Page 246 and 247:
482effect of criteria are not provi
- Page 248 and 249:
484and community events. This trans
- Page 251 and 252:
ContributorsAysun ATES AKDENIZAfter
- Page 253 and 254:
School. She recieved her BSc fromİ
- Page 255:
ContentsAliye Ahu AKGÜN • Editor