04.02.2023 Views

ACCA F8 - Audit and Assurance Revision Kit 2016

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Deficiency and explanation

Damaged or old inventory quantities are crossed

out and those items are given a nil quantity. This

means all record of these items is lost and they

may still have a value – they need to be assessed

by more senior staff members.

Count sheets are to be discarded once the

inventory system is updated. This means there will

be no audit trail for inventory quantities and no

way to verify how accurately the data has been

entered.

Possible solution

Damaged or old inventory quantities should be

maintained. They may be highlighted on the list.

However, an appropriate independent senior staff

member should carry out a separate review for

damaged or old items and identify those which

may need to included as part of an inventory

provision.

Count sheets should be retained and, for a sample

of inventory items, an independent person should

verify that the quantities on the count sheets have

been entered correctly.

95 Panda

Text reference. Chapter 1, Chapter 18 and Chapter 19.

Top tips. Part (a) is knowledge-based on the elements of assurance engagements and you should be able to score

the full five marks here. In part (b), you first need to assess whether each of the issues is material or not so make

sure you use the figures provided in the question for revenue and profit before taxation to make your assessment.

Remember also to consider whether these are adjusting events or not. Each issue is worth six marks so assume

there are three marks for explaining whether an amendment is required and three marks for the audit procedures. In

part (c), you must fully explain how the non-disclosure/amendment relating to the explosion might affect the

auditor’s report – it is not enough to say that the opinion will be modified, for example; you must explain the basis

of any modification and whether it is material or pervasive. Note that in this part you are only asked to discuss the

explosion – you must not include a discussion of the defective chemicals as this has not been asked for.

Easy marks. Part (a) offers easy marks for explaining the elements of an assurance engagement.

Marking scheme

Marks

(a)

Up to 1 mark per well explained element

– Intended user, responsible party, practitioner

– Subject matter

– Suitable criteria

– Appropriate evidence

– Assurance report 5

(b)

Up to 1 mark per valid point, overall maximum of 6 marks per event

Event 1 – Defective chemicals

– Provides evidence of conditions at the year end

– Inventory to be adjusted to lower of cost and net realisable value

– Calculation of materiality

– Review board minutes/quality control reports

– Discuss with the directors, adequate inventory to continue to

trade

– Obtain written representation re going concern

– Obtain schedule of defective inventory, agree to supporting

documentation

– Discuss with directors basis of the scrap value 6

152 Answers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!