04.02.2023 Views

ACCA F8 - Audit and Assurance Revision Kit 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ethical threat

Current & Co have been asked to produce the

financial statements of Orange Financials Co.

This represents a possible self-review threat as

Currant & Co would be both preparing and auditing

the same information.

As Orange Financials Co is not a listed company the

preparation and audit of financial statements is not

prohibited by ethical standards. However the

company is in the process of seeking a listing which

increases audit risk as it is likely that potential

investors will rely on these financial statements to

make investment decisions.

The assistant finance director of Orange Financials

Co has joined Currant & Co as a partner and it has

been suggested that he should be the independent

review partner.

This represents a self-review threat as the same

individual would be responsible for reviewing the

audit of financial statements which he has been

involved in preparing.

Current & Co would like to conduct other

assignments for Orange Financials Co.

This gives rise to a potential self-interest threat as

the total fees generated from this client may form a

substantial proportion of the fees of the firm which

may have an impact on the firm's objectivity.

Orange Financials Co has indicated that the other

work will only be awarded to Currant & Co if it

completes the audit with minimal issues.

This gives rise to an intimidation threat as the audit

team may feel under pressure not to perform a

thorough audit in order to comply with this request.

The audit team has been offered a luxury weekend

away once the stock exchange listing has been

completed.

This represents a self-interest threat as the

independence of the audit team may be affected by

their wish to go on the holiday.

How it might be reduced

As the company is in the process of obtaining a

listing the threat to independence may be assessed

as too high if Currant & Co both prepares and

audits the financial statements.

If Currant & Co does choose to prepare the financial

statements it should ensure that there are two

separate teams, one which prepares the financial

statements and one which performs the audit.

This individual must not be involved in the audit of

Orange Financials Co and another partner should be

appointed as the review partner.

The other work will only be available when Orange

Financials Co obtains its listing. The company will

then be a public interest entity so Currant & Co will

need to consider whether the these additional fees

together with existing fees represent 15% of the

firm's total fees for two consecutive years. Where

this is the case disclosure must be made to those

charged with governance and a review (pre or post

issuance) must be conducted .

The audit partner should explain to the finance

director that the firm is required to perform the

audit in accordance with auditing and quality

control standards. As a result all relevant issues and

questions will have to be investigated thoroughly in

order to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to

form the audit opinion. The length of time this will

take cannot be guaranteed.

If the finance director is unwilling to accept this and

continues to put undue pressure on Currant & Co

the firm should consider resigning from the

engagement.

As the value of the hospitality is unlikely to be

inconsequential no safeguards would be adequate

to reduce the threat to an acceptable level. The offer

of the weekend away should be declined politely.

70 Answers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!