27.12.2012 Views

Final Report 4.1

Final Report 4.1

Final Report 4.1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UPWIND<br />

6. Load mitigation concept analysis at dynamic control<br />

level<br />

In the following Chapter, several concepts for load mitigation in the dynamic control level are<br />

introduced. These concepts use additional control loops and systems in order to reduce overall<br />

loading. The shown concepts just give an overview of possible options and could be extended.<br />

6.1 Tower-feedback control<br />

Aerodynamic damping is the main damping effect for modern wind turbines during operation.<br />

Both, aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loads are mitigated by this damping source mainly for<br />

flapwise blade and the nacelle fore-aft motion. Due to the major impact of the aerodynamic<br />

damping effect and since the effect is mainly caused by the aerodynamic conditions at the rotor<br />

blades and the tower top response of the support structure, active enhancement through the<br />

manipulation of the aerodynamic conditions via pitch control seems to be a powerful approach<br />

for the load mitigation. A possible approach to enhance this damping effect is the so-called<br />

tower-feedback control (TFC) concept.<br />

Figure 6.1: Principle of tower-feedback control<br />

The strategy is based on an estimation of the RNA movement in terms of velocities. Both, the<br />

instantaneous velocity and an approximation of the change in the velocity within a short period<br />

of time can be derived from the acceleration by integration. The additional pitch angle denotes<br />

the pitch angle that is superimposed to the pitch angle provided by the regular controller. The<br />

required direction of the additional pitch angle depends on the direction of the RNA velocity. If<br />

the RNA has the same direction as the wind an increase of the pitch angle compared to the<br />

regular pitch angle as demanded by the regular controller is required. For the opposite direction<br />

of the RNA movement i.e. against the wind direction an increased thrust force is induced by an<br />

additional decrease of the pitch angle. In both cases an additional thrust force component,<br />

compared to the regular case without extra pitch, is induced, acting against the direction of the<br />

RNA movement. The additional pitch angle must change the sign as soon as the RNA<br />

movement changes the sign. An ideal correlation of the additional pitch angle and the RNA<br />

Page 69 of 146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!