Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Methods and Cases

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Edwards, S. F. 1988. “Option Prices for Groundwater Protection.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 465-87. Freeman III, A. M. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Second Edition. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, Giraldez, C. and G. Fox. 1995. “An Economic Analysis of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Nitrate Emissions in Southern Ontario.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 43(1): 177-84. Hurley, T., M. Otto and D. Holtkamp. 1999. “Valuation of Water Quality in Livestock Regions: An Application to Rural Watersheds in Iowa.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1): 177-84. Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). February 2000. The Illinois Groundwater Protection Act: A Safeguard for Illinois’ Water Supply. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). November 1985. All About Groundwater. EPA Publication No. 15009. Jordan, J. L. and A. H. Elnagheeb. 1993. “Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Drinking Water Quality.” Water Resource Research 29(2): 237-245. McConnell, K. E. 1992. “Model Building and Judgment: Implications for Benefit Transfers with Travel Cost Models.” Water Resources Research 28 (3): 695-700. McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze, J. K. Lazo, D. Waldman, J. K. Doyle, S. R. Elliott, J. R. Irwin. 1992. Methods for Measuring Non-Use Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Groundwater Cleanup. Final Report, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Environmental Protection Agency, Cooperative Agreement #CR-815183. Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. 1989. Existence Values for Groundwater Protection. Draft Final Report Prepared Under Cooperative Agreement CR814041-01 between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Resources for the Future. National Research Council (NRC). 1997. Valuing Groundwater: Economic Concepts and Approaches. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Natural Resource Damages Task Force of the CERCLA Subcommittee, Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (NRD Task Force). April 1998. Compendium of Groundwater Valuation Methodologies. 79
Nielson, E. G. and L.K. Lee. October 1987. “The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective.” Agricultural Economic Report 576. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Poe, G. L. 1993. Information, Risk Perceptions and Contingent Values: The Case of Nitrates in Groundwater. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University. Poe, G. L. 1998 “Valuation of Groundwater Quality Using a Contingent Valuation-Damage Function Approach.” Water Resources Research 34(12): 3627-33. Poe, G. L. and R. C. Bishop. 1999. “Valuing the Incremental Benefits of Groundwater Protection When Exposure Levels Are Known.” Environmental and Resource Economics 13(3): 341-67. Powell, J. R. 1991. The Value of Groundwater Protection: Measurement of Willingness to Pay Information and Its Utilization by Local Government Decision-Makers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Powell, J. R., D. Allee, and C. J. McClintock. 1994. “Groundwater Protection Benefits and Local Community Planning: Impact of Contingent Valuation Information.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(5): 1068-75. Segerson, K. 1994. “The Benefits of Groundwater Protection: Discussion.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(5): 1076-1978. Shultz, S. D. and B. E. Lindsay. 1990. “The Willingness to Pay for Groundwater Protection.” Water Resources Research 26(9): 1869-75. Sun, H., J. C. Bergstrom, and J. H. Dorfman. 1992. “Estimating the Benefits of Groundwater Contamination Control.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(2): 63-71. Walker, D. R. and J. P. Hoehn. 1990. “The Economic Damages of Groundwater Contamination in Small Rural Communities: An Application to Nitrates.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 12(1): 47-56. 80
Page 1 and 2:
WMRC Reports Waste Management and R
Page 3 and 4:
RR-108 Natural Resource Damage Asse
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgments Funding was provide
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1: Tables and Figures Table
Page 9 and 10:
staff of agencies that are just beg
Page 11 and 12:
All: 64 Nevada Division of Environm
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1.5 Number of Cases Settled b
Page 15 and 16:
Table 1.9 Number of Potentially Res
Page 17 and 18:
Table 1.14 Cost to Trustee of Perfo
Page 19 and 20:
Mean Settlement (million $) 90 80 7
Page 21 and 22:
V. Conclusions Trustees have had re
Page 23 and 24:
Appendix: Materials in Information-
Page 25 and 26:
NRD: Natural resource damages. Guid
Page 27 and 28:
Survey of State Natural Resource Da
Page 29 and 30:
19) Has this case been settled? (Ch
Page 31 and 32:
I. Introduction Chapter 2 Simplifie
Page 33 and 34: Number of Spills 1,000 800 600 400
Page 35 and 36: damages not quantifiable at reasona
Page 37 and 38: (b) Columbia River Estuary: Bird, f
Page 39 and 40: Example of the Washington method in
Page 41 and 42: % of All Cases 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Page 43 and 44: preventing excessive expenditures o
Page 45 and 46: Example of the Florida formula in u
Page 47 and 48: damages to natural resources at con
Page 49 and 50: discharge on receptors studied in t
Page 51 and 52: Information for this calculation is
Page 53 and 54: ased funding for the program was pr
Page 55 and 56: a spill occurs in a high income are
Page 57 and 58: References Cozine, M. H. 1999. “N
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3: Tables and Figures Table
Page 61 and 62: This chapter will examine the exten
Page 63 and 64: Comprehensive Environmental Respons
Page 65 and 66: Output price P0 C D S0 is the suppl
Page 67 and 68: Travel-cost analysis can be used fo
Page 69 and 70: area B and computing willingness to
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.1: Summary of Studies Estim
Page 73 and 74: Schultz and Lindsay (1990) estimate
Page 75 and 76: Table 3.3: Using Benefits Transfer
Page 77 and 78: Number of Cases 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Page 79 and 80: Table 3.4 Groundwater Case Studies
Page 81 and 82: and overall protection of the resou
Page 83: References Abdalla, C. W. 1991. “
Page 87 and 88: United States, adjoining shorelines
Page 89 and 90: Once there is a “release” of a
Page 91 and 92: 1997). Second, there can be no reco
Page 93 and 94: settlement of NRD claim prior to an
Page 95 and 96: egulations divide the assessment pr
Page 97 and 98: Damages: The trustees calculated th
Page 99 and 100: The State hired consultants (ARCADI
Page 101 and 102: C. Lake Barre/Texaco Site: The site
Page 103 and 104: would be inefficient and unnecessar
Page 105 and 106: Damages: The U.S. Coast Guard requi
Page 107 and 108: Creek and the cultural importance o
show all

Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Methods and Cases

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?