06.06.2023 Views

Green Economy Journal Issue 58

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MOBILITY<br />

MOBILITY<br />

Zeiss Microscopy<br />

MINERAL SUPPLY<br />

CONSTRAINTS<br />

are LOOMING<br />

The rapid increase in EV sales during the pandemic has tested the resilience of battery supply<br />

chains and Russia’s war in Ukraine further exacerbated the challenge. Prices of raw materials such<br />

as cobalt, lithium and nickel have surged.<br />

BY INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY*<br />

Unprecedented battery demand and a lack of structural<br />

investment in new supply capacity are key factors. Russia’s<br />

invasion of Ukraine created pressures because Russia supplies<br />

20% of global high purity nickel. Average battery prices fell by 6%<br />

to USD132 per kilowatt-hour in 2021, a slower decline than the 13%<br />

drop the previous year. Given the current oil price environment the<br />

relative competitiveness of EVs remains unaffected.<br />

Today’s battery supply chains are concentrated around China, which<br />

produces three-quarters of all lithium-ion batteries and is home to 70%<br />

of production capacity for cathodes and 85% of production capacity<br />

for anodes (both are key components of batteries). Over half of lithium,<br />

cobalt and graphite processing and refining capacity is in China.<br />

Europe is responsible for over one-quarter of global EV production,<br />

but it is home to very little of the supply chain apart from cobalt<br />

processing at 20%. The US has an even smaller role in the global<br />

EV battery supply chain with only 10% of EV production and 7% of<br />

battery production capacity.<br />

Both Korea and Japan have considerable shares of the supply<br />

chain downstream of raw material processing, particularly in the<br />

highly technical cathode and anode material production. Korea is<br />

responsible for 15% of cathode material production capacity, while<br />

Japan accounts for 14% of cathode and 11% of anode material<br />

production. Korean and Japanese companies are also involved in the<br />

production of other battery components such as separators.<br />

Mining generally takes place in resource-rich countries such as<br />

Australia, Chile and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and is handled<br />

by a few major companies. Governments in Europe and the US have<br />

32<br />

bold public sector initiatives to develop domestic battery supply<br />

chains, but most of the supply chain is likely to remain Chinese through<br />

2030. For example, 70% of battery production capacity announced for<br />

the period to 2030 is in China.<br />

Additional investments are needed in the short term, particularly in<br />

mining, where lead times are much longer than for other parts of the<br />

supply chain.<br />

Digital material simulation to map diffusion behaviours in an NMC<br />

lithium-ion battery cathode.<br />

Zeiss Microscopy<br />

The supply of some minerals such as lithium would need to rise<br />

by up to one third by 2030 to match the demand for EV batteries.<br />

For example, demand for lithium – the commodity with the largest<br />

projected demand-supply gap – is projected to increase sixfold to<br />

500 kilotonnes by 2030, requiring the equivalent of 50 new averagesized<br />

mines.<br />

There are other variables affecting demand for minerals. If current<br />

high commodity prices endure, cathode chemistries could shift<br />

towards less mineral-intensive options. For example, the lithium iron<br />

phosphate chemistry does not require nickel nor cobalt but comes<br />

with a lower-energy density and is better suited for shorter- range<br />

EVs. Their share of global EV battery supply has more than doubled<br />

DOWNLOAD REPORT<br />

3D rendering of an intact lithium-ion battery.<br />

*This article is an excerpt from the report GLOBAL EV OUTLOOK 2022 | Securing supplies for an electric future | International Energy Agency | [2022].<br />

THOUGHT [ECO]NOMY<br />

since 2020 because of high mineral prices and technology innovation,<br />

primarily driven by an increasing uptake in China.<br />

Innovation in new chemistries, such as manganese-rich cathodes<br />

or even sodium-ion, could further reduce the pressure on mining.<br />

Recycling can also reduce demand for minerals. Although the impact<br />

between now and 2030 is likely to be small, recycling’s contribution to<br />

moderating mineral demand is critical after 2030.<br />

EV BATTERY SUPPLY CHAIN | Trends, risks and opportunities in a fast-evolving sector | Fitch Solutions<br />

County Risk & Industry Research | [December 2021]<br />

Companies have taken various actions to secure their EV battery supply chains. EV automakers are<br />

investing heavily into the localisation of their supply chains. By offering them a nearby supply of lithiumion<br />

batteries (LiBs), local gigafactories will reduce firms’ dependency on foreign suppliers and the<br />

downside risks ingrained in global supply chains.<br />

greeneconomy/report recycle<br />

This is particularly evident in the midstream as of November 2021, there is a total of 145 EV battery factories<br />

that are either operating or undergoing construction across 28 markets. This includes 51 construction<br />

projects in Europe, totalling 1 230GWh, and 29 in North America at 488.2GWh.<br />

These projects are key enablers in the localisation of EV battery supply chains. Localisation is occurring<br />

upstream with automakers and EV battery manufacturers employing various strategies to develop local<br />

supplies of CRMs near manufacturing sites.<br />

Renewable energy should become a major pull-factor for EV battery manufacturers in the near term.<br />

Battery manufacturing is capital and energy-intensive process – it therefore behoves firms to produce<br />

in markets with abundant access to affordable renewable energy to secure funding (given the growing<br />

importance of ESG in investment decision-making) and to ensure the sustainability of EVs. Consequently,<br />

we the primary pull factor for EV battery manufacturers (outside of government support) will shift from<br />

labour cost/availability to renewable energy cost, availability and sustainability. This is because automakers, and their large commercial<br />

clients, have put in place their own sustainability strategies which will place increased pressure on their component suppliers to become more<br />

sustainable. This will include sourcing ethically produced materials, using renewable energy and reducing carbon footprints along their own<br />

supply chains.<br />

Recycling presents several upside risks to the EV supply chain. By enabling automakers to re-use the CRMs in EV batteries, recycling<br />

offers an affordable, reliable and local supply of CRMs, which tapers automakers’ exposure to supply chain risks and reliance on the mining industry<br />

for regular supplies of expensive metals. Recycling is also an attractive process, particularly to governments and private sector firms, as by diverting<br />

LiBs away from landfills recycling contributes to an organisation’s sustainability efforts.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!