Green Economy Journal Issue 58
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MOBILITY<br />
MOBILITY<br />
Zeiss Microscopy<br />
MINERAL SUPPLY<br />
CONSTRAINTS<br />
are LOOMING<br />
The rapid increase in EV sales during the pandemic has tested the resilience of battery supply<br />
chains and Russia’s war in Ukraine further exacerbated the challenge. Prices of raw materials such<br />
as cobalt, lithium and nickel have surged.<br />
BY INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY*<br />
Unprecedented battery demand and a lack of structural<br />
investment in new supply capacity are key factors. Russia’s<br />
invasion of Ukraine created pressures because Russia supplies<br />
20% of global high purity nickel. Average battery prices fell by 6%<br />
to USD132 per kilowatt-hour in 2021, a slower decline than the 13%<br />
drop the previous year. Given the current oil price environment the<br />
relative competitiveness of EVs remains unaffected.<br />
Today’s battery supply chains are concentrated around China, which<br />
produces three-quarters of all lithium-ion batteries and is home to 70%<br />
of production capacity for cathodes and 85% of production capacity<br />
for anodes (both are key components of batteries). Over half of lithium,<br />
cobalt and graphite processing and refining capacity is in China.<br />
Europe is responsible for over one-quarter of global EV production,<br />
but it is home to very little of the supply chain apart from cobalt<br />
processing at 20%. The US has an even smaller role in the global<br />
EV battery supply chain with only 10% of EV production and 7% of<br />
battery production capacity.<br />
Both Korea and Japan have considerable shares of the supply<br />
chain downstream of raw material processing, particularly in the<br />
highly technical cathode and anode material production. Korea is<br />
responsible for 15% of cathode material production capacity, while<br />
Japan accounts for 14% of cathode and 11% of anode material<br />
production. Korean and Japanese companies are also involved in the<br />
production of other battery components such as separators.<br />
Mining generally takes place in resource-rich countries such as<br />
Australia, Chile and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and is handled<br />
by a few major companies. Governments in Europe and the US have<br />
32<br />
bold public sector initiatives to develop domestic battery supply<br />
chains, but most of the supply chain is likely to remain Chinese through<br />
2030. For example, 70% of battery production capacity announced for<br />
the period to 2030 is in China.<br />
Additional investments are needed in the short term, particularly in<br />
mining, where lead times are much longer than for other parts of the<br />
supply chain.<br />
Digital material simulation to map diffusion behaviours in an NMC<br />
lithium-ion battery cathode.<br />
Zeiss Microscopy<br />
The supply of some minerals such as lithium would need to rise<br />
by up to one third by 2030 to match the demand for EV batteries.<br />
For example, demand for lithium – the commodity with the largest<br />
projected demand-supply gap – is projected to increase sixfold to<br />
500 kilotonnes by 2030, requiring the equivalent of 50 new averagesized<br />
mines.<br />
There are other variables affecting demand for minerals. If current<br />
high commodity prices endure, cathode chemistries could shift<br />
towards less mineral-intensive options. For example, the lithium iron<br />
phosphate chemistry does not require nickel nor cobalt but comes<br />
with a lower-energy density and is better suited for shorter- range<br />
EVs. Their share of global EV battery supply has more than doubled<br />
DOWNLOAD REPORT<br />
3D rendering of an intact lithium-ion battery.<br />
*This article is an excerpt from the report GLOBAL EV OUTLOOK 2022 | Securing supplies for an electric future | International Energy Agency | [2022].<br />
THOUGHT [ECO]NOMY<br />
since 2020 because of high mineral prices and technology innovation,<br />
primarily driven by an increasing uptake in China.<br />
Innovation in new chemistries, such as manganese-rich cathodes<br />
or even sodium-ion, could further reduce the pressure on mining.<br />
Recycling can also reduce demand for minerals. Although the impact<br />
between now and 2030 is likely to be small, recycling’s contribution to<br />
moderating mineral demand is critical after 2030.<br />
EV BATTERY SUPPLY CHAIN | Trends, risks and opportunities in a fast-evolving sector | Fitch Solutions<br />
County Risk & Industry Research | [December 2021]<br />
Companies have taken various actions to secure their EV battery supply chains. EV automakers are<br />
investing heavily into the localisation of their supply chains. By offering them a nearby supply of lithiumion<br />
batteries (LiBs), local gigafactories will reduce firms’ dependency on foreign suppliers and the<br />
downside risks ingrained in global supply chains.<br />
greeneconomy/report recycle<br />
This is particularly evident in the midstream as of November 2021, there is a total of 145 EV battery factories<br />
that are either operating or undergoing construction across 28 markets. This includes 51 construction<br />
projects in Europe, totalling 1 230GWh, and 29 in North America at 488.2GWh.<br />
These projects are key enablers in the localisation of EV battery supply chains. Localisation is occurring<br />
upstream with automakers and EV battery manufacturers employing various strategies to develop local<br />
supplies of CRMs near manufacturing sites.<br />
Renewable energy should become a major pull-factor for EV battery manufacturers in the near term.<br />
Battery manufacturing is capital and energy-intensive process – it therefore behoves firms to produce<br />
in markets with abundant access to affordable renewable energy to secure funding (given the growing<br />
importance of ESG in investment decision-making) and to ensure the sustainability of EVs. Consequently,<br />
we the primary pull factor for EV battery manufacturers (outside of government support) will shift from<br />
labour cost/availability to renewable energy cost, availability and sustainability. This is because automakers, and their large commercial<br />
clients, have put in place their own sustainability strategies which will place increased pressure on their component suppliers to become more<br />
sustainable. This will include sourcing ethically produced materials, using renewable energy and reducing carbon footprints along their own<br />
supply chains.<br />
Recycling presents several upside risks to the EV supply chain. By enabling automakers to re-use the CRMs in EV batteries, recycling<br />
offers an affordable, reliable and local supply of CRMs, which tapers automakers’ exposure to supply chain risks and reliance on the mining industry<br />
for regular supplies of expensive metals. Recycling is also an attractive process, particularly to governments and private sector firms, as by diverting<br />
LiBs away from landfills recycling contributes to an organisation’s sustainability efforts.<br />
33