09.06.2023 Views

Flight International - 04

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Programme Recovery

US Marine Corps

Flaw was identified in wake of a

crash involving STOVL variant

Engine fix ends F-35 delivery pause

Ten-week suspension of stealth fighter shipments is brought

to an end after Pratt & Whitney resolves vibration issue

Ryan Finnerty Tampa

The US Department of Defense

(DoD) has cleared

the resumption of Lockheed

Martin F-35 deliveries, which

had been on pause after a non- fatal

accident involving the type.

“[We] are currently working with

the US services, partner nations

and Foreign Military Sales customers

on the movement of aircraft to

their operational units,” the Pentagon’s

F-35 Joint Program Office

(JPO) said on 14 March.

The operational use of all F-35s

received approval from the DoD

after “extensive technical and

flightworthy checks”, it adds.

Acceptance of new-build aircraft

had been placed on hold after a

short take-off and vertical landing

(STOVL) F-35B crashed during a

test flight at Lockheed’s Fort Worth

site in Texas last December.

The DoD and Lockheed subsequently

grounded all F-35s with

less than 40h of operational use

and halted new deliveries.

F135 engine supplier Pratt & Whitney

(P&W) traced the mishap to a

“harmonic resonance”, or vibration

issue. Jennifer Latka, its vice-president

of F135 programmes, says the

issue occurs at “a certain frequency

and certain amplitude” when multiple

parameters converge to create

a “very rare systems phenomenon”.

Having identified the cause in

February, P&W developed a “mitigation

measure”, enabling it to

resume F135 deliveries, and production

flight operations at Fort

Worth to begin again on 6 March.

The DoD has ordered a fleetwide

modification, which the JPO

says involves an “inexpensive, nonintrusive”

retrofit which can be performed

at operational units in 4-8h.

Lockheed notes that it continued

producing jets during the 10-week

flight pause, and says the disruption

will not prevent it from meeting

contracted delivery obligations.

The airframer last year missed its

F-35 delivery target by seven jets,

which chief financial officer Jay

Malave attributes to the temporary

delivery suspension. Having handed

over 141 of the aircraft in 2022, it this

year plans to transfer 156 examples.

Propulsion upgrade

Meanwhile, the US Air Force

(USAF) has supported upgrading

the current propulsion system on

its F-35As, rather than purchasing

a replacement engine.

Announced by secretary of the air

force Frank Kendall on 13 March, the

decision came as the Biden administration

released its proposal for

military spending in fiscal year 2024

without funds for the Adaptive

Engine Transition Program (AETP).

“[AETP] is not transitioning to a

programme of record,” the USAF

confirms. Under the effort, the service

in 2016 began funding development

of a new engine for the

F-35, centred on an adaptive-cycle

design capable of boosting electrical

power generation and thrust.

The service spent some $4 billion

on the effort, with both P&W and GE

Aerospace producing prototypes.

GE had urged the USAF to adopt

its XA100 design, while P&W –

despite developing an XA101 prototype

– instead promoted a third

option: an engine core upgrade

(ECU) for the F135.

A major factor behind the air

force’s decision appears to have

been the AETP engines’ lack of

suitability for programme-wide integration,

specifically on the F-35B.

“Although the results of analyses

determined AETP provided

the best overall F-35A operational

performance, the F135 engine core

upgrade will restore engine life and

prevent degradation for all three

F-35 variants at the lowest cost,”

the service tells FlightGlobal.

“We can deliver upgraded engines

starting in 2028,” says Jill Albertelli,

president of P&W’s military engines

division. “The F135 ECU saves billions,

which ensures a record quantity

of F-35s can be procured.”

GE has criticised the decision.

“This [FY2024] budget fails to

consider rising geopolitical tensions

and the need for revolutionary

capabilities that only the XA100

engine can provide by 2028,” it says.

The USAF’s preference is no

guarantee, however, with lawmakers

to have the final say.

“Nearly 50 bipartisan members

of Congress wrote in support of

advanced engine programmes like

ours because they recognise these

needs,” GE says. ◗

8 Flight International April 2023

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!